Source separation: Challenges & opportunities for transition in the swedish wastewater sector

A paradigm shift to waste reuse has started in the wastewater sector with many experts calling for greater resource recovery, often facilitated by alternative solutions such as source separation. Source separation has been shown to be advantageous for improving treatment capacity, food security, and efficiency; yet these systems are still immature, considered risky by professionals and scarcely implemented. This study attempts to answer the question of why source separation is still marginalized by examining the Swedish experience with source separated wastewater from the perspective of Technology Innovation Systems (TIS) in order to identify obstacles and policy recommendations. Considering that source-separation is still in a development phase, the study found that source separation works moderately well within the on-site niche and that blackwater systems in general perform better than urine diversion. Knowledge development is found to be the weakest function. A major blocking mechanism is the weakness of interchange between knowledge development and entrepreneurial activity. Policy recommendations include: increased R & D; building networks and communication platforms; and establishing guidelines for technologies, legislation interpretation and organizational models.

[1]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[2]  M. Maurer,et al.  Source separation: will we see a paradigm shift in wastewater handling? , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  M. Borsuk,et al.  Charting a path for innovative toilet technology using multicriteria decision analysis. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[5]  H. Jönsson,et al.  Role of farmers in improving the sustainability of sanitation systems , 2010 .

[6]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[7]  M. Nilsson Socio-technical evaluation of urine diversion in Linköping and Norrköping , 2014 .

[8]  Cajsa Larsson,et al.  Teknikenkät - enskilda avlopp 2009 , 2011 .

[9]  H. Jönsson,et al.  Urine separating sewage systems--environmental effects and resource usage. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  M. B. Beck,et al.  A New Planning and Design Paradigm to Achieve Sustainable Resource Recovery from Wastewater. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Håkan Jönsson,et al.  Local recycling of plant nutrients from small-scale wastewater systems to farmland—A Swedish scenario study , 2007 .

[12]  J Keller,et al.  Platforms for energy and nutrient recovery from domestic wastewater: A review. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[13]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[14]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .

[15]  H. Jönsson,et al.  Environmental impact of recycling nutrients in human excreta to agriculture compared with enhanced wastewater treatment. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Sverker Molander,et al.  On-Site Sewage Systems from Good to Bad to…? Swedish Experiences with Institutional Change and Technological Dependencies 1900 to 2010 , 2013 .

[17]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[18]  J. Galloway,et al.  Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions , 2008, Science.

[19]  C. Etnier,et al.  OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO EVALUATION AND USE OF DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TECHNOLOGIES AND MANAGEMENT , 2007 .

[20]  J. Schröder,et al.  Towards global phosphorus security: a systems framework for phosphorus recovery and reuse options. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[21]  Adriano Joss,et al.  How to avoid pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[22]  Treavor H. Boyer,et al.  Life cycle comparison of centralized wastewater treatment and urine source separation with struvite precipitation: Focus on urine nutrient management. , 2015, Water research.

[23]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Comment on “Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet” , 2015, Science.

[24]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Sustainable innovation in wastewater management: lessons for nutrient recovery and reuse , 2013 .