Research Commentary: Toward the 24-Hour Knowledge Factory - a Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Concerted Research

The term "24-Hour Knowledge Factory" connotes a geographically dispersed team of workers in which members of the team are able to work on specific endeavors on a round- the-clock basis. A professional could work in the US on a standard 9 am to 5 pm basis. At the end of his or her workday, the activity is transferred to a colleague in China who works during daytime in that country. At the end of the latter's workday, the work is transferred to a third colleague in Poland or Romania, who in turn will pass the baton 8 hours later to the first worker in the US. Each member of the team works during the normal workday hours that pertain to his or her time zone. The use of sequential workers that underpins the concept of 24-Hour Knowledge Factory has some similarity to the shift-style workforce that evolved in the manufacturing sector as an adjunct to the industrial revolution. Just as the latter concept had a profound impact on the entire manufacturing sector, we argue that the concept of 24-Hour Knowledge Factory will have a major impact on the entire field of information systems, and that more research is needed in this area. The concept of 24-Hour Knowledge Factory is relevant for semi-structured work in both the IS arena as well as in other professional arenas such as finance, product development, marketing, and medicine. The proposed areas of research can help to create the IS infrastructure for supporting applications in these diverse arenas.

[1]  Rudolf K. Keller,et al.  Pattern-based reverse-engineering of design components , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering (IEEE Cat. No.99CB37002).

[2]  David P. Boyd,et al.  The Need for a Corporate Global Mind-Set , 2003 .

[3]  Z. Chaczko,et al.  24/7 Software Development in Virtual Student Exchange Groups: Redefining the Work and Study Week , 2006, 2006 7th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training.

[4]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Blaxill Mf,et al.  The fallacy of the overhead quick fix. , 1991 .

[6]  Amar Gupta,et al.  Agile Systems With Reusable Patterns of Business Knowledge: A Component-Based Approach (Artech House Computing Library) , 2005 .

[7]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[8]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  UMEA: translating interaction histories into project contexts , 2003, CHI '03.

[9]  T. Hout,et al.  The fallacy of the overhead quick fix. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[10]  George S. Yip,et al.  Developing Global Strategies for Service Businesses , 1996 .

[11]  Anthony DiRomualdo,et al.  Strategic Intent for IT Outsourcing , 1998 .

[12]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Changing Patterns of International Competition , 1986 .

[13]  Amar Gupta,et al.  A Knowledge Based Approach to Facilitate Enginering Design , 2002 .

[14]  David Lei,et al.  Global Strategy, Competence-Building and Strategic Alliances , 1992 .

[15]  James J. Treinen,et al.  Following the sun: Case studies in global software development , 2006, IBM Syst. J..

[16]  M. Dell The power of virtual integration: an interview with Dell Computer's Michael Dell. Interview by Joan Magretta. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[17]  Monica Yap,et al.  Follow the sun: distributed extreme programming development , 2005, Agile Development Conference (ADC'05).

[18]  N. Kaka A choice of models , 2003 .

[19]  R. Nolan,et al.  How to Manage an IT Outsourcing Alliance , 1995 .

[20]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies , 1997 .

[21]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  Time-machine computing: a time-centric approach for the information environment , 1999, UIST '99.

[22]  D. Rosenfield,et al.  The New Dynamics of Global Manufacturing Site Location , 1994 .

[23]  Erran Carmel,et al.  The Maturation of Offshore Sourcing of Information Technology Work , 2002, MIS Q. Executive.

[24]  Soon Ang,et al.  Employment outsourcing in information systems , 1996, CACM.

[25]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  A methodology for designing form-based decision support systems , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[26]  Duvvuru Sriram,et al.  Artificial intelligence in engineering design (Volume III): knowledge acquisition, commercial systems, and integrated environments , 1992 .

[27]  K. Subramanian,et al.  Leveraging Resources in Global Software Development , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[28]  Ravi Aron,et al.  Enabled Strategic Outsourcing : Knowledge Intensive Firms , Information Work and the Extended Organizational Form , 2002 .

[29]  Wang Xin,et al.  Supporting design reuse based on integrated design rationale , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[30]  P. Bain,et al.  ‘An assembly line in the head’: work and employee relations in the call centre , 1999 .

[31]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  It's About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Conflict mitigation system for collaborative engineering , 1995, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[33]  Joan Magretta,et al.  The Power of Virtual Integration: An Interview with Dell Computer''s Michael Dell , 1998 .

[34]  N. Venkat Venkatraman,et al.  Offshoring Without Guilt , 2004 .

[35]  A. Bartmess,et al.  Building Competitive Advantage through a Global Network of Capabilities , 1993 .

[36]  W. Powell Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[37]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  The new logic of high-tech R&D , 1999 .

[38]  J. Barney How a Firm's Capabilities Affect Boundary Decisions , 1999 .

[39]  P. Klahr,et al.  Managing Customer Support Knowledge , 1998 .

[40]  Nicholas G. Carr In Praise of Walls , 2004 .

[41]  David A. Light Cross-Cultural Lessons in Leadership , 2003 .

[42]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Theorizing the Future of Strategy: Questions for Shaping Strategy Research in the Knowledge Economy , 2006 .

[43]  P. Drucker They're not employees, they're people. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[44]  Blaz Zupan,et al.  A function-decomposition method for development of hierarchical multi-attribute decision models , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[45]  Amar Gupta A four-faceted knowledge-based approach to surmounting borders , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[46]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[47]  David Gelernter,et al.  Lifestreams: an alternative to the desktop metaphor , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[48]  Xin Wang,et al.  Supporting design reuse based on integrated design rationale , 2001, SMC.

[49]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy , 2002 .

[50]  N. Venkatraman Beyond Outsourcing: Managing IT Resources as a Value Center , 1997 .

[51]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  STRATEGIC OUTSOURCING: LEVERAGING KNOWLEDGE CAPABILITIES , 1999 .

[52]  Clayton M. Christensen The past and future of competitive advantage , 2001 .

[53]  Danny Miller,et al.  Strategic Integration: Competing in the Age of Capabilities , 2000 .

[54]  K. Peattie,et al.  Meeting the Closed-Loop Challenge: The Case of Remanufacturing , 2004 .

[55]  International Conference: Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training , 2000 .

[56]  M. J. Earl,et al.  The Risks of Outsourcing IT , 1996 .