Morphological Considerations of Fish Fin Shape on Thrust Generation

In this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between thrust generation and fish fin shape. To compare the effect fin shape had on thrust generation, we categorized the morphological shapes of fish fins into equilateral polygonal shapes. Polygonal fins were used to generate thrust that depended only on shape. These fins were constructed of a hard elastic material to eliminate any influence of shape deformation. A servomotor with a reciprocal rotation moved a fin cyclically, and thrust was experimentally measured using a strain gage system. Thrust tended to be proportional to the inertia moment of a fin, which indicated difficulty with rotation. Moreover, this trend for thrust generation was directly related to the number of apexes of a polygonal fin. The force translated ratio, which was thrust divided by the force required for fin rotation, was evaluated to determine the hydrodynamic characteristics of fins. This finding showed that the force translated ratio of a fin increased with increased movable perimeter length. The greatest thrust was generated by a triangular fin rotated at its apex, which is often seen in general fish tail fins, whereas the hydrodynamic characteristics were the worst in polygonal fins.

[1]  Osamu Mochizuki,et al.  Consideration of thrust in escaping motion of a mosquito larva , 2010 .

[2]  Seiichiro Izawa,et al.  Boundary Layer Receptivity to Localized Disturbances in Freestream Caused by a Vortex Ring Collision , 2013 .

[3]  J. Gray Studies in Animal Locomotion , 1936 .

[4]  Matthew Ringuette,et al.  Vortex formation and saturation for low-aspect-ratio rotating flat-plate fins , 2012 .

[5]  John G. Swallow,et al.  Drag-Based ‘Hovering’ in Ducks: The Hydrodynamics and Energetic Cost of Bottom Feeding , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  H. Fernholz Boundary Layer Theory , 2001 .

[7]  Steven Vogel,et al.  Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World , 2003 .

[8]  Jun Sakakibara,et al.  Stereo-PIV study of flow around a maneuvering fish , 2004 .

[9]  M. Lighthill Hydromechanics of Aquatic Animal Propulsion , 1969 .

[10]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Function of the Caudal Fin During Locomotion in Fishes: Kinematics, Flow Visualization, and Evolutionary Patterns1 , 2000 .

[11]  Hazim B. Awbi,et al.  Effect of Wind-Tunnel Walls on the Drag of a Sphere , 1981 .

[12]  Chapman,et al.  Experimental simulation of the thrust phases of fast-start swimming of fish , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  T. Hung Life in Moving Fluids—The physical biology of flow , 1988 .

[14]  Michael Sfakiotakis,et al.  Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion , 1999 .

[15]  Osamu Mochizuki,et al.  The flow induced by a jellyfish , 2008, J. Vis..

[16]  Akira Azuma Swimming by Fanning , 1992 .

[17]  Daegyoum Kim,et al.  Characteristics of vortex formation and thrust performance in drag-based paddling propulsion , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  E. G. Drucker,et al.  Function of pectoral fins in rainbow trout: behavioral repertoire and hydrodynamic forces , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  E. G. Drucker,et al.  Locomotor function of the dorsal fin in rainbow trout: kinematic patterns and hydrodynamic forces , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  M. Lighthill Note on the swimming of slender fish , 1960, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  N. Kato,et al.  Control performance in the horizontal plane of a fish robot with mechanical pectoral fins , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[22]  K. Weiss,et al.  SCPP Gene Evolution and the Dental Mineralization Continuum , 2008, Journal of dental research.

[23]  Naomi Kato,et al.  Optimization of Motion of a Mechanical Pectoral Fin , 2003 .

[24]  J. Gray Studies in Animal Locomotion: VI. The Propulsive Powers of the Dolphin , 1936 .