A novel method for quantification of beam's‐eye‐view tumor tracking performance

Purpose: In‐treatment imaging using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) can be used to confirm patient and tumor positioning. Real‐time tumor tracking performance using current digital megavolt (MV) imagers is hindered by poor image quality. Novel EPID designs may help to improve quantum noise response, while also preserving the high spatial resolution of the current clinical detector. Recently investigated EPID design improvements include but are not limited to multi‐layer imager (MLI) architecture, thick crystalline and amorphous scintillators, and phosphor pixilation and focusing. The goal of the present study was to provide a method of quantitating improvement in tracking performance as well as to reveal the physical underpinnings of detector design that impact tracking quality. The study employs a generalizable ideal observer methodology for the quantification of tumor tracking performance. The analysis is applied to study both the effect of increasing scintillator thickness on a standard, single‐layer imager (SLI) design as well as the effect of MLI architecture on tracking performance. Methods: The present study uses the ideal observer signal‐to‐noise ratio (d′) as a surrogate for tracking performance. We employ functions which model clinically relevant tasks and generalized frequency‐domain imaging metrics to connect image quality with tumor tracking. A detection task for relevant Cartesian shapes (i.e., spheres and cylinders) was used to quantitate trackability of cases employing fiducial markers. Automated lung tumor tracking algorithms often leverage the differences in benign and malignant lung tissue textures. These types of algorithms (e.g., soft‐tissue localization – STiL) were simulated by designing a discrimination task, which quantifies the differentiation of tissue textures, measured experimentally and fit as a power‐law in trend (with exponent β) using a cohort of MV images of patient lungs. The modeled MTF and NPS were used to investigate the effect of scintillator thickness and MLI architecture on tumor tracking performance. Results: Quantification of MV images of lung tissue as an inverse power‐law with respect to frequency yields exponent values of β = 3.11 and 3.29 for benign and malignant tissues, respectively. Tracking performance with and without fiducials was found to be generally limited by quantum noise, a factor dominated by quantum detective efficiency (QDE). For generic SLI construction, increasing the scintillator thickness (gadolinium oxysulfide – GOS) from a standard 290 μm to 1720 μm reduces noise to about 10%. However, 81% of this reduction is appreciated between 290 and 1000 μm. In comparing MLI and SLI detectors of equivalent individual GOS layer thickness, the improvement in noise is equal to the number of layers in the detector (i.e., 4) with almost no difference in MTF. Further, improvement in tracking performance was slightly less than the square‐root of the reduction in noise, approximately 84–90%. In comparing an MLI detector with an SLI with a GOS scintillator of equivalent total thickness, improvement in object detectability is approximately 34–39%. Conclusions: We have presented a novel method for quantification of tumor tracking quality and have applied this model to evaluate the performance of SLI and MLI EPID designs. We showed that improved tracking quality is primarily limited by improvements in NPS. When compared to very thick scintillator SLI, employing MLI architecture exhibits the same gains in QDE, but by mitigating the effect of optical Swank noise, results in more dramatic improvements in tracking performance.

[1]  Ross Berbeco,et al.  The impact of cine EPID image acquisition frame rate on markerless soft-tissue tracking. , 2014, Medical physics.

[2]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics , 2000 .

[3]  Arnaud Belard,et al.  Fiducial markers in prostate for kV imaging: quantification of visibility and optimization of imaging conditions , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Omar S. Al-Kadi,et al.  Texture Analysis of Aggressive and Nonaggressive Lung Tumor CE CT Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT. , 2010, Medical physics.

[6]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging. , 2013, Medical physics.

[7]  R. K. Swank Absorption and noise in x‐ray phosphors , 1973 .

[8]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  T. Higuchi Relationship between the fractal dimension and the power law index for a time series: a numerical investigation , 1990 .

[12]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Nooshin Kiarashi,et al.  Task-based strategy for optimized contrast enhanced breast imaging: analysis of six imaging techniques for mammography and tomosynthesis , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[14]  Ross I Berbeco,et al.  Clinical feasibility of using an EPID in CINE mode for image-guided verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Mehran Ebrahimi,et al.  Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging. , 2013, Medical physics.

[16]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  Analysis of lung nodule detectability and anatomical clutter in tomosynthesis imaging of the chest , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[17]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  A piecewise-focused high DQE detector for MV imaging. , 2015, Medical physics.

[18]  Daniel Shedlock,et al.  A novel multilayer MV imager computational model for component optimization , 2017, Medical physics.

[19]  Omar S. Al-Kadi,et al.  Susceptibility of texture measures to noise: An application to lung tumor CT images , 2008, 2008 8th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering.

[20]  Ross Berbeco,et al.  Using an external surrogate for predictor model training in real-time motion management of lung tumors. , 2014, Medical physics.

[21]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT. , 2008, Medical physics.

[22]  B. Fallone,et al.  Modeling scintillator-photodiodes as detectors for megavoltage CT. , 2004, Medical physics.

[23]  F R Verdun,et al.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. , 1999, Medical physics.

[24]  Grace J Gang,et al.  Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance. , 2011, Medical physics.

[25]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging. , 2008, Medical physics.

[26]  William Vennart,et al.  ICRU Report 54: Medical imaging—the assessment of image quality: ISBN 0-913394-53-X. April 1996, Maryland, U.S.A. , 1997 .

[27]  Paul Keall,et al.  Real-time soft tissue motion estimation for lung tumors during radiotherapy delivery. , 2013, Medical physics.

[28]  L Desponds,et al.  Image quality index (IQI) for screen-film mammography. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Ross Berbeco,et al.  A novel EPID design for enhanced contrast and detective quantum efficiency , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Richard F. Voss,et al.  Fractals in nature: from characterization to simulation , 1988 .

[31]  Shao Hong,et al.  Fractal dimension applied in texture feature extraction in x-ray chest image retrieval , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation.

[32]  L Court,et al.  A multi-region algorithm for markerless beam's-eye view lung tumor tracking , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Quantum noise properties of CT images with anatomical textured backgrounds across reconstruction algorithms: FBP and SAFIRE. , 2014, Medical physics.

[34]  G. Lubberts,et al.  Random Noise Produced by X-Ray Fluorescent Screens* , 1968 .

[35]  Wei Zhao,et al.  The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2011, Medical physics.

[36]  J. Boone,et al.  Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities. , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Renuka Uppaluri,et al.  Fractal analysis of high-resolution CT images as a tool for quantification of lung diseases , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[38]  Goran Ristic,et al.  X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators. , 2004, Medical physics.

[39]  Savino Cilla,et al.  Epid cine acquisition mode for in vivo dosimetry in dynamic arc radiation therapy , 2008 .

[40]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Intrafractional tumor motion: lung and liver. , 2004, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[41]  Wei Zhao,et al.  The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging. , 2014, Medical physics.

[42]  C. Floyd,et al.  A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system. , 2005, Medical physics.

[44]  Shoji Kido,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Internal and Peripheral Textures of Small Peripheral Bronchogenic Carcinomas in Thin-section Computed Tomography: Comparison of Bronchioloalveolar Cell Carcinomas With Nonbronchioloalveolar Cell Carcinomas , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[45]  Dora L.W. Kwong,et al.  Quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[46]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Optimization of contrast‐enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model , 2017, Medical physics.

[47]  Albert Koong,et al.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous fiducial marker implantation for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2009, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[48]  V. Cosgrove,et al.  Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[49]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Contours of Breast Masses in Mammograms , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.