Patients respond similarly to paper and electronic versions of the WOMAC and SF-12 following total joint arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study was to determine agreement between responses on electronic and paper versions of the WOMAC and SF-12(v2) questionnaires following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Patients completed both electronic and paper questionnaires with a one week interval in-between. The order in which they completed the two versions was randomly assigned. A total of 53 patients completed the study, with a mean age of 69 years (range 50-90 years). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were high, indicating excellent agreement (WOMAC ICC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98), SF-12 (PCS) ICC = 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97; SF-12 (MCS) ICC = 0.92, 95%CI 0.86-0.95). Online data collection may be substituted for the traditional paper method with no significant effect on the criterion validity of the questionnaires.

[1]  P. Bech,et al.  Reliability of short form-36 in an Internet- and a pen-and-paper version , 2009, Informatics for health & social care.

[2]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[3]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[4]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. , 2000, The Journal of rheumatology.

[5]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Responsiveness of the electronic touch screen WOMAC 3.1 OA Index in a short term clinical trial with rofecoxib. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  Nicholas Bellamy,et al.  Osteoarthritis Index delivered by mobile phone (m-WOMAC) is valid, reliable, and responsive. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  Robyn Attewell,et al.  A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[9]  Hong-Mei Wang,et al.  Crossover randomized controlled trial of the electronic version of the Chinese SF-36 , 2007, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.

[10]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  F. Salaffi,et al.  The use of computer touch-screen technology for the collection of patient-reported outcome data in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with standardized paper questionnaires. , 2009, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[12]  George D. Kitas,et al.  Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[13]  E. Juniper,et al.  Validation of an electronic version of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. , 2009, Respiratory medicine.

[14]  Henrik Malchau,et al.  Comparison of paper and computer-based questionnaire modes for measuring health outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  M. Drummond.  Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[16]  D. Bonett.  Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  N. Hjollund,et al.  Response Rate and Completeness of Questionnaires: A Randomized Study of Internet Versus Paper-and-Pencil Versions , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  L. Portney,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .

[19]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Comparison of the responsiveness and relative effect size of the western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the short-form Medical Outcomes Study Survey in a randomized, clinical trial of osteoarthritis patients. , 1999, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[20]  J. J. Caro Sr,et al.  Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation? , 2004, Quality of Life Research.