A Bayesian approach for estimating the probability of trigger failures in the stop-signal paradigm

Response inhibition is frequently investigated using the stop-signal paradigm, where participants perform a two-choice response time task that is occasionally interrupted by a stop signal instructing them to withhold their response. Stop-signal performance is formalized as a race between a go and a stop process. If the go process wins, the response is executed; if the stop process wins, the response is inhibited. Successful inhibition requires fast stop responses and a high probability of triggering the stop process. Existing methods allow for the estimation of the latency of the stop response, but are unable to identify deficiencies in triggering the stop process. We introduce a Bayesian model that addresses this limitation and enables researchers to simultaneously estimate the probability of trigger failures and the entire distribution of stopping latencies. We demonstrate that trigger failures are clearly present in two previous studies, and that ignoring them distorts estimates of stopping latencies. The parameter estimation routine is implemented in the BEESTS software (Matzke et al., Front. Quantitative Psych. Measurement, 4, 918; 2013a) and is available at http://dora.erbe-matzke.com/software.html.

[1]  Pierre-Louis Bazin,et al.  Cortico-subthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .

[3]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[4]  G. Logan,et al.  Fictitious Inhibitory Differences , 2013, Psychological science.

[5]  G. Logan,et al.  Impulsivity and Inhibitory Control in Normal Development and Childhood Psychopathology , 1990 .

[6]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control. , 2014, Psychological review.

[8]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Fitting Wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: An example using functions for the S-PLUS package , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[9]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  QMPE: Estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[10]  Casimir J. H. Ludwig,et al.  Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation of hierarchical response time models , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Patrick G. Bissett,et al.  Balancing Cognitive Demands: Control Adjustments in the Stop-signal Paradigm Stop-signal Paradigm Post-stop-signal Slowing , 2011 .

[12]  G. Logan,et al.  Development of inhibitory control across the life span. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[13]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A hierarchical process-dissociation model. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  POSTERIOR PREDICTIVE ASSESSMENT OF MODEL FITNESS VIA REALIZED DISCREPANCIES , 1996 .

[16]  Hans Colonius,et al.  Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model , 2001, Vision Research.

[17]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[18]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  Release the BEESTS: Bayesian Estimation of Ex-Gaussian STop-Signal reaction time distributions , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[19]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[20]  L. Tierney.  Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions , 1994 .

[21]  M. Aitkin,et al.  Bayes factors: Prior sensitivity and model generalizability , 2008 .

[22]  P. Michie,et al.  Acts of control in schizophrenia: dissociating the components of inhibition , 2002, Psychological Medicine.

[23]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[25]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Multinomial Processing Tree Models with Heterogeneity in Participants and Items , 2013, Psychometrika.

[26]  G. Logan,et al.  Fictitious Inhibitory Differences , 2013, Psychological science.

[27]  G. Logan.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[28]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[29]  P. Michie,et al.  Stop-signal response inhibition in schizophrenia: Behavioural, event-related potential and functional neuroimaging data , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[30]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation , 2003 .