Critical hemodynamic therapy oriented resuscitation helping reduce lung water production and improve survival

Background Increased extravascular lung water (EVLW) in shock is common in the critically ill patients. This study aimed to explore the effect of cardiac output (CO) on EVLW and its relevant influence on prognosis. Methods The hemodynamic data of 428 patients with pulse-indicated continuous CO catheterization from Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The patients were assigned to acute respiratory distress syndrome group, cardiogenic shock group, septic shock group, and combined shock (cardiogenic and septic) group according to their symptoms. Information on 28-day mortality and renal function was also collected. Results The CO and EVLW index (EVLWI) in the cardiogenic and combined shock groups were lower than those in the other groups (acute respiratory distress syndrome group vs. cardiogenic shock group vs. septic shock group vs. combined shock group: CO, 5.1 [4.0, 6.2] vs. 4.7 [4.0, 5.7] vs. 5.5 [4.3, 6.7] vs. 4.6 [3.5, 5.7] at 0 to 24 h, P = 0.009; 4.6 [3.8, 5.6] vs. 4.8 [4.1, 5.7] vs. 5.3 [4.4, 6.5] vs. 4.5 [3.8, 5.3] at 24 to 48 h, P = 0.048; 4.5 [4.1, 5.4] vs. 4.8 [3.8, 5.5] vs. 5.3 [4.0, 6.4] vs. 4.0 [3.2, 5.4] at 48 to 72 h, P = 0.006; EVLWI, 11.4 [8.7, 19.1] vs. 7.9 [6.6, 10.0] vs. 8.8 [7.4, 11.0] vs. 8.2 [6.7, 11.3] at 0 to 24 h, P < 0.001; 11.8 [7.7, 17.2] vs. 7.8 [6.3, 10.2] vs. 8.7 [6.6, 12.2] vs. 8.0 [6.6, 11.1] at 24 to 48 h, P < 0.001; and 11.3 [7.7, 18.7] vs. 7.5 [6.3, 10.0] vs. 8.8 [6.3, 12.2] vs. 8.4 [6.4, 11.2] at 48 to 72 h, P < 0.001. The trend of the EVLWI in the septic shock group was higher than that in the cardiogenic shock group (P < 0.05). Moreover, there existed some difference in the pulmonary vascular permeability index among the cardiogenic shock group, the septic shock group, and the combined shock group, without statistical significance (P > 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in tissue perfusion or renal function among the four groups during the observation period (P > 0.05). However, the cardiogenic shock group had a higher 28-day survival rate than the other three groups [log rank (Mantel-Cox) = 31.169, P < 0.001]. Conclusion Tissue-aimed lower CO could reduce the EVLWI and achieve a better prognosis.

[1]  L. Su,et al.  Personalized Critical Hemodynamic Therapy Concept for Shock Resuscitation , 2018, Chinese medical journal.

[2]  Xiang Zhou,et al.  Oxygen–Flow–Pressure Targets for Resuscitation in Critical Hemodynamic Therapy , 2018, Shock.

[3]  J. Marshall,et al.  Higher Fluid Balance Increases the Risk of Death From Sepsis: Results From a Large International Audit* , 2017, Critical care medicine.

[4]  J. Marini,et al.  Experts’ opinion on management of hemodynamics in ARDS patients: focus on the effects of mechanical ventilation , 2016, Intensive Care Medicine.

[5]  R. Bellomo,et al.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). , 2016, JAMA.

[6]  M. Kollef,et al.  Targeted Fluid Minimization Following Initial Resuscitation in Septic Shock: A Pilot Study. , 2015, Chest.

[7]  M. Jozwiak,et al.  Extravascular lung water in critical care: recent advances and clinical applications , 2015, Annals of Intensive Care.

[8]  D. Lobo,et al.  Impact of intravenous fluid composition on outcomes in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome , 2015, Critical Care.

[9]  Hua-qing Shu,et al.  Restrictive Fluid Resuscitation Leads to Better Oxygenation than Non-Restrictive Fluid Resuscitation in Piglets with Pulmonary or Extrapulmonary Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome , 2015, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[10]  J. Vincent,et al.  A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis , 2015, Critical Care.

[11]  S. M. Lobo,et al.  O que ocorre com o balanço hídrico durante e após a reversão do choque séptico , 2015 .

[12]  S. Lobo,et al.  What happens to the fluid balance during and after recovering from septic shock? , 2015, Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva.

[13]  S. Kushimoto,et al.  Early-phase changes of extravascular lung water index as a prognostic indicator in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients , 2014, Annals of Intensive Care.

[14]  M. Matthay.  Resolution of pulmonary edema. Thirty years of progress. , 2014, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  S. Kushimoto,et al.  Relationship between extravascular lung water and severity categories of acute respiratory distress syndrome by the Berlin definition , 2013, Critical Care.

[16]  S. Kushimoto,et al.  The clinical usefulness of extravascular lung water and pulmonary vascular permeability index to diagnose and characterize pulmonary edema: a prospective multicenter study on the quantitative differential diagnostic definition for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome , 2012, Critical Care.

[17]  M. Malbrain,et al.  Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance , 2012, Annals of Intensive Care.

[18]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome The Berlin Definition , 2012 .

[19]  Phillip Andrus,et al.  Lung Ultrasound in the Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure , 2012, Current cardiology reviews.

[20]  R. Maharaj.  Extravascular Lung Water and Acute Lung Injury , 2011, Cardiology research and practice.

[21]  Shu-Min Lin,et al.  Extravascular Lung Water Correlates Multiorgan Dysfunction Syndrome and Mortality in Sepsis , 2010, PloS one.

[22]  S. Kushimoto,et al.  Validation of extravascular lung water measurement by single transpulmonary thermodilution: human autopsy study , 2010, Critical care.

[23]  G. Miserocchi.  Mechanisms controlling the volume of pleural fluid and extravascular lung water , 2009, European Respiratory Review.

[24]  Didier Payen,et al.  A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure , 2008, Critical care.

[25]  C. Sartori,et al.  Pathogenesis of pulmonary edema: Learning from high-altitude pulmonary edema , 2007, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology.

[26]  N. Anguel,et al.  Assessing pulmonary permeability by transpulmonary thermodilution allows differentiation of hydrostatic pulmonary edema from ALI/ARDS , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.

[27]  E. Rivers.  Fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury--liberal, conservative, or both? , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  A. Goetz,et al.  Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients , 2006, Intensive Care Medicine.

[29]  C. Sprung,et al.  High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury. , 2005, Chest.

[30]  G. Martin,et al.  Extravascular lung water in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective cohort study , 2005, Critical care.

[31]  M. Matthay.  Clinical measurement of pulmonary edema. , 2002, Chest.

[32]  K. Reinhart,et al.  Prognostic value of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients. , 2002, Chest.

[33]  J. Marini,et al.  Consequences of vascular flow on lung injury induced by mechanical ventilation. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[34]  D. Schuster,et al.  Improved outcome based on fluid management in critically ill patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization. , 1992, The American review of respiratory disease.

[35]  D. Schuster,et al.  Fluid balance during pulmonary edema. Is fluid gain a marker or a cause of poor outcome? , 1991, Chest.

[36]  G Saumon,et al.  High inflation pressure pulmonary edema. Respective effects of high airway pressure, high tidal volume, and positive end-expiratory pressure. , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[37]  P. Suter,et al.  [Measurement of extravascular lung water: a toy or tool?]. , 1986, Der Anaesthesist.