A unified definition of niche and fitness differences

Explaining nature’s biodiversity is a key challenge for science1. To persist against a background of interacting species with potentially higher fitness, populations must be able to grow faster when rare, a feature called negative frequency dependence2–4. Coexistence theory quantifies this dependence as niche differences (), but the available definitions differ greatly in how should vary with the type of species interactions, and often apply to specific community types only. Here, we present a new definition of that is consistent with biological intuition and can be applied to communities driven by both negative and positive species interactions, filling a main gap in the literature5,6. We also derive a definition for the corresponding fitness differences () among species, and illustrate how and jointly determine coexistence for various community types. We demonstrate that our definitions can be operationalised with theoretical models and experimental data. Our definition qualifies as the first method to quantify and in a standardised way across theoretical and empirical communities, facilitating comparison and fostering synthesis in community ecology.

[1]  R. Freckleton,et al.  How to quantify competitive ability , 2018 .

[2]  Joan M. Meiners,et al.  Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[3]  Simon Maccracken Stump,et al.  Chesson's coexistence theory , 2018 .

[4]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence , 2017 .

[5]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[6]  B. Gilbert,et al.  Species coexistence: macroevolutionary relationships and the contingency of historical interactions , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Stephen P Ellner,et al.  Coexistence of perennial plants: an embarrassment of niches. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[8]  M. Crawley,et al.  Foliar fungal pathogens and grassland biodiversity. , 2010, Ecology.

[9]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[10]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[11]  C. Stern CONCLUDING REMARKS OF THE CHAIRMAN , 1950 .

[12]  Ian Holmes,et al.  Linking Statistical and Ecological Theory: Hubbell's Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity as a Hierarchical Dirichlet Process , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  M. Turelli,et al.  Does environmental variability limit niche overlap? , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Peter B Adler,et al.  A niche for neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[15]  Peter B. Adler,et al.  Large niche differences emerge at the recruitment stage to stabilize grassland coexistence , 2015 .

[16]  J. Grilli,et al.  Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models , 2017, Nature.

[17]  J. Huisman,et al.  Adaptive divergence in pigment composition promotes phytoplankton biodiversity , 2004, Nature.

[18]  E. Mordecai Pathogen impacts on plant communities: unifying theory, concepts, and empirical work , 2011 .

[19]  M. Rillig,et al.  Responsiveness of plants to mycorrhiza regulates coexistence , 2018, Journal of Ecology.

[20]  D. Bellwood,et al.  A unified model explains commonness and rarity on coral reefs. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[21]  Grenfell,et al.  Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Plant coexistence and the niche , 2004 .

[23]  Peter B. Adler,et al.  Forecasting plant community impacts of climate variability and change: when do competitive interactions matter? , 2012 .

[24]  Tadashi Fukami,et al.  Linking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory , 2017 .

[25]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Competition and Coexistence with Multiple Life‐History Stages , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J. C. de Almeida,et al.  Concluding Remarks , 2015, Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH.

[27]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  A competition–defence trade‐off both promotes and weakens coexistence in an annual plant community , 2018, Journal of Ecology.

[28]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Experimental evidence that evolutionary relatedness does not affect the ecological mechanisms of coexistence in freshwater green algae. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[29]  P. Chesson Multispecies Competition in Variable Environments , 1994 .

[30]  Lucas J Stal,et al.  Colourful coexistence of red and green picocyanobacteria in lakes and seas. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[31]  Da‐Yong Zhang,et al.  Evolution alters ecological mechanisms of coexistence in experimental microcosms , 2016 .

[32]  森下 Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. , 1961 .

[33]  R. Macarthur Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[34]  Vigdis Vandvik,et al.  From facilitation to competition: temperature‐driven shift in dominant plant interactions affects population dynamics in seminatural grasslands , 2016, Global change biology.

[35]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory , 2012 .

[36]  Peter Chesson,et al.  The interaction between predation and competition , 2008, Nature.

[37]  W. Carson,et al.  HERBIVORY AND PLANT SPECIES COEXISTENCE: COMMUNITY REGULATION BY AN OUTBREAKING PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECT , 2000 .

[38]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Inferring species interactions in ecological communities: a comparison of methods at different levels of complexity , 2015 .

[39]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[40]  T. Fukami,et al.  Applying modern coexistence theory to priority effects , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences. , 2017, Ecology.

[42]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Temporal coexistence mechanisms contribute to the latitudinal gradient in forest diversity , 2017, Nature.

[43]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Species Competition and Predation , 2013 .

[44]  Coexistence theory and the frequency-dependence of priority effects , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[45]  Yevhen F. Suprunenko,et al.  Using exclusion rate to unify niche and neutral perspectives on coexistence , 2017 .

[46]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity , 2009, Nature.

[47]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Accurate predictions of coexistence in natural systems require the inclusion of facilitative interactions and environmental dependency , 2018, Journal of Ecology.

[48]  Roger M Nisbet,et al.  Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function. , 2011, Ecology.

[49]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  S. Schreiber,et al.  When rarity has costs: coexistence under positive frequency-dependence and environmental stochasticity. , 2019, Ecology.

[51]  Peter Chesson,et al.  MacArthur's consumer-resource model , 1990 .

[52]  S. Hurlbert The Measurement of Niche Overlap and Some Relatives , 1978 .

[53]  Lucas J Stal,et al.  Colorful niches of phototrophic microorganisms shaped by vibrations of the water molecule , 2007, The ISME Journal.

[54]  Charles F. Delwiche,et al.  Ecological interactions and coexistence are predicted by gene expression similarity in freshwater green algae , 2017 .

[55]  S. Hubbell The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32) , 2011 .

[56]  P. Venail,et al.  Size differences predict niche and relative fitness differences between phytoplankton species but not their coexistence , 2019, The ISME Journal.

[57]  Oscar Godoy,et al.  Phenology effects on invasion success: insights from coupling field experiments to coexistence theory. , 2014, Ecology.

[58]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness and the determinants of competitive outcomes. , 2014, Ecology letters.