Temporal differences in DNA replication during the S phase using single fiber analysis of normal human fibroblasts and glioblastoma T98G cells

We have recently shown that replication forks pause near origins in normal human fibroblasts (NHF1-hTERT) but not glioblastoma T98G cells. This observation led us to question whether other differences in the replication program may exist between these cell types that may relate to their genetic integrity. To identify differences, we detected immunoflourescently the sequential incorporation of the nucleotide analogs IdU and CldU into replicating DNA at the start of every hour of a synchronized S phase. We then characterized the patterns of labeled replicating DNA tracks and quantified the percentages and lengths of the tracks found at these hourly intervals. From the directionality of labeling in single extended replicating DNA fibers, tracks were categorized as single bidirectional origins, unidirectional elongations, clusters of origins firing in tandem, or merging forks (terminations). Our analysis showed that the start of S phase is enriched in single bidirectional origins in NHF1-hTERT cells, followed by an increase in clustering during mid S phase and an increase in merging forks during late S phase. Early S phase in T98G cells also largely consisted of single bidirectional origin initiations; however, an increase in clustering was delayed until an hour later, and clusters were shorter in mid/late S phase than in NHF1-hTERT cells. The spike in merging forks also did not occur until an hour later in T98G cells. Our observations suggest models to explain the temporal replication of single and clustered origins, and suggest differences in the replication program in a normal and cancer cell line.

[1]  M. Debatisse,et al.  Replication fork movement sets chromatin loop size and origin choice in mammalian cells , 2008, Nature.

[2]  D. Kaufman,et al.  DNA replication in early S phase pauses near newly activated origins , 2008, Cell cycle.

[3]  F. Daboussi,et al.  A homologous recombination defect affects replication-fork progression in mammalian cells , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[4]  John Herrick,et al.  Replication fork velocities at adjacent replication origins are coordinately modified during DNA replication in human cells. , 2007, Molecular biology of the cell.

[5]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Mapping of an origin of DNA replication in the promoter of fragile X gene FMR1. , 2007, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[6]  J. Weissenbach,et al.  DNA replication origin interference increases the spacing between initiation events in human cells. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  T. Furey,et al.  Genome-wide sequence and functional analysis of early replicating DNA in normal human fibroblasts , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[8]  D. Kaufman,et al.  A Late Origin of DNA Replication in the Trinucleotide Repeat Region of the Human FMR2 Gene , 2006, Cell cycle.

[9]  D. Zink The temporal program of DNA replication: new insights into old questions , 2006, Chromosoma.

[10]  Srinka Ghosh,et al.  Temporal profile of replication of human chromosomes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Spatio‐temporal organization of DNA replication in murine embryonic stem, primary, and immortalized cells , 2005, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[12]  J. Diffley,et al.  Visualization of Altered Replication Dynamics after DNA Damage in Human Cells* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  Sandra Goetze,et al.  Chromatin loops are selectively anchored using scaffold/matrix-attachment regions , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[14]  Owen T McCann,et al.  Replication timing of the human genome. , 2004, Human molecular genetics.

[15]  M. Carrì,et al.  Chromosome length and DNA loop size during early embryonic development of Xenopus laevis , 1993, Chromosoma.

[16]  B. Vig,et al.  Visualization of elementary DNA replication units in human nuclei corresponding in size to DNA loop domains , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[17]  Richard S. Paules,et al.  An ATR- and Chk1-Dependent S Checkpoint Inhibits Replicon Initiation following UVC-Induced DNA Damage , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  Ronald Berezney,et al.  The spatio-temporal organization of DNA replication sites is identical in primary, immortalized and transformed mammalian cells , 2002, Journal of Cell Science.

[19]  N. Kleckner,et al.  ATR Homolog Mec1 Promotes Fork Progression, Thus Averting Breaks in Replication Slow Zones , 2002, Science.

[20]  David I. Smith,et al.  A role for common fragile site induction in amplification of human oncogenes. , 2002, Cancer cell.

[21]  Caroline Demeret,et al.  Chromatin remodelling and DNA replication: from nucleosomes to loop domains , 2001, Oncogene.

[22]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Nuclear organization of DNA replication in primary mammalian cells. , 2000, Genes & development.

[23]  R. Glaser,et al.  Replication of Heterochromatin and Structure of Polytene Chromosomes , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[24]  Stephen W. Scherer,et al.  Replication Delay along FRA7H, a Common Fragile Site on Human Chromosome 7, Leads to Chromosomal Instability , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  Ronald Berezney,et al.  Heterogeneity of eukaryotic replicons, replicon clusters, and replication foci , 2000, Chromosoma.

[26]  Carl Wu,et al.  The ISWI chromatin-remodeling protein is required for gene expression and the maintenance of higher order chromatin structure in vivo. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[27]  C. Benham,et al.  Transcriptional augmentation: modulation of gene expression by scaffold/matrix-attached regions (S/MAR elements). , 2000, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[28]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Nuclear Organization of Mammalian Genomes , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  P. Cook The organization of replication and transcription. , 1999, Science.

[30]  W. Liu,et al.  Allele-specific late replication and fragility of the most active common fragile site, FRA3B. , 1999, Human molecular genetics.

[31]  C Cremer,et al.  Organization of early and late replicating DNA in human chromosome territories. , 1999, Experimental cell research.

[32]  E. Cobb,et al.  Identification of chromosomal bands replicating early in the S phase of normal human fibroblasts. , 1998, Experimental cell research.

[33]  Ronald Berezney,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of DNA Replication Sites in Mammalian Cells , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  J. Hamlin,et al.  Attachment to the nuclear matrix mediates specific alterations in chromatin structure. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  G. Bernardi,et al.  The gene-richest bands of human chromosomes replicate at the onset of the S-phase , 1998, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[36]  R. Espinosa,et al.  Replication of a common fragile site, FRA3B, occurs late in S phase and is delayed further upon induction: implications for the mechanism of fragile site induction. , 1998, Human molecular genetics.

[37]  Ana Pombo,et al.  Replicon Clusters Are Stable Units of Chromosome Structure: Evidence That Nuclear Organization Contributes to the Efficient Activation and Propagation of S Phase in Human Cells , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  T. Canfield,et al.  A variable domain of delayed replication in FRAXA fragile X chromosomes: X inactivation-like spread of late replication. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  G Bernardi,et al.  Identification of the gene-richest bands in human chromosomes. , 1996, Gene.

[40]  A. C. Chinault,et al.  Large domains of apparent delayed replication timing associated with triplet repeat expansion at FRAXA and FRAXE. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[41]  W. L. Fangman,et al.  Multiple determinants controlling activation of yeast replication origins late in S phase. , 1996, Genes & development.

[42]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Interplay between chromatin structure and transcription. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[43]  T. Tlsty,et al.  Differential disruption of genomic integrity and cell cycle regulation in normal human fibroblasts by the HPV oncoproteins. , 1994, Genes & development.

[44]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Metaphase chromosome structure: Bands arise from a differential folding path of the highly AT-rich scaffold , 1994, Cell.

[45]  P. Cook,et al.  Replication factories. , 1994, Trends in cell biology.

[46]  B. Windle,et al.  High resolution visual mapping of stretched DNA by fluorescent hybridization , 1993, Nature Genetics.

[47]  D. Jackson,et al.  Visualization of replication factories attached to a nucleoskeleton , 1993, Cell.

[48]  G J Brakenhoff,et al.  Dynamics of three-dimensional replication patterns during the S-phase, analysed by double labelling of DNA and confocal microscopy. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[49]  G. Holmquist,et al.  Chromosome bands, their chromatin flavors, and their functional features. , 1992, American journal of human genetics.

[50]  P. Cook The nucleoskeleton and the topology of replication , 1991, Cell.

[51]  W. Kaufmann,et al.  Role of postreplication repair in transformation of human fibroblasts to anchorage independence. , 1991, Cancer research.

[52]  N. Ogata Preferential association of a transcriptionally active gene with the nuclear matrix of rat fibroblasts transformed by a simian-virus-40-pBR322 recombinant plasmid. , 1990, The Biochemical journal.

[53]  D. Jackson,et al.  The size of chromatin loops in HeLa cells. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[54]  J. White,et al.  Replication occurs at discrete foci spaced throughout nuclei replicating in vitro. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[55]  J. Davie,et al.  Chromatin structure of erythroid-specific genes of immature and mature chicken erythrocytes. , 1989, The Biochemical journal.

[56]  M. Marilley,et al.  Supercoiled loop organization of genomic DNA: a close relationship between loop domains, expression units, and replicon organization in rDNA from Xenopus laevis. , 1989, Experimental cell research.

[57]  R Berezney,et al.  Mapping replicational sites in the eucaryotic cell nucleus , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[58]  P. Dijkwel,et al.  Comparative analysis of DNA loop length in nontransformed and transformed hamster cells. , 1987, Mutation research.

[59]  W. Strätling Gene-specific differences in the supranucleosomal organization of rat liver chromatin. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[60]  G. Georgiev,et al.  Replication origins are attached to the nuclear skeleton. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[61]  H Nakamura,et al.  Structural organizations of replicon domains during DNA synthetic phase in the mammalian nucleus. , 1986, Experimental cell research.

[62]  G. Schreiber,et al.  The association of acute phase protein genes with the nuclear matrix of rat liver during experimental inflammation. , 1986, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[63]  P. Dijkwel,et al.  Permanent attachment of replication origins to the nuclear matrix in BHK-cells. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[64]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  The association of transcribed genes with the nuclear matrix of Drosophila cells during heat shock. , 1985, Nucleic acids research.

[65]  R Berezney,et al.  Spatial distribution of DNA loop attachment and replicational sites in the nuclear matrix , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[66]  S. M. Rose,et al.  Differentiation-dependent chromatin alterations precede and accompany transcription of immunoglobulin light chain genes. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[67]  R. Wetzels,et al.  Attachment of origins of replication to the nuclear matrix and the chromosomal scaffold , 1984, FEBS letters.

[68]  B. O’Malley,et al.  Actively transcribed genes are associated with the nuclear matrix , 1983, Nature.

[69]  G. Holmquist,et al.  Characterization of Giemsa dark- and light-band DNA , 1982, Cell.

[70]  J. Červenka,et al.  Patterns of DNA replication of human chromosomes. II. Replication map and replication model. , 1982, American journal of human genetics.

[71]  M. Buongiorno-Nardelli,et al.  A relationship between replicon size and supercoiled loop domains in the eukaryotic genome , 1982, Nature.

[72]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  Supercoiled loops and eucaryotic DNA replication , 1980, Cell.

[73]  A. Oppenheim,et al.  Initiation Points for DNA Replication in Nontransformed and Simian Virus 40-Transformed BALB/c 3T3 Cells , 1978, Journal of virology.

[74]  Robert G. Martin,et al.  Initiation points for DNA replication in nontransformed and simian virus 40-transformed Chinese hamster lung cells , 1977, Cell.

[75]  A. Riggs,et al.  On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes. , 1968, Journal of molecular biology.

[76]  A. Riggs,et al.  Autoradiography of chromosomal DNA fibers from Chinese hamster cells. , 1966, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.