An Automated Agent for Bilateral Negotiation with Bounded Rational Agents with Incomplete Information

Many day-to-day tasks require negotiation, mostly under conditions of incomplete information. In particular, the opponent's exact tradeoff between different offers is usually unknown. We propose a model of an automated negotiation agent capable of negotiating with a bounded rational agent (and in particular, against humans) under conditions of incomplete information. Although we test our agent in one specific domain, the agent's architecture is generic; thus it can be adapted to any domain as long as the negotiators' preferences can be expressed in additive utilities. Our results indicate that the agent played significantly better, including reaching a higher proportion of agreements, than human counterparts when playing one of the sides, while when playing the other side there was no significant difference between the results of the agent and the human players.

[1]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  On Stable Social Laws and Qualitative Equilibria , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Wolfgang Leiniger,et al.  Games and information: An introduction to game theory: Eric Rasmusen, (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1989) , 1991 .

[3]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Anomalous Behavior in a Traveler's Dilemma? , 1999 .

[5]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation , 2004, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Decision-theoretic foundations of qualitative possibility theory , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Kenneth O. May,et al.  Review: R. Duncan Luce, Individual choice behavior, a theoretical analysis , 1960 .

[8]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[9]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[10]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments , 2001, Intelligent robots and autonomous agents.

[11]  Jon Doyle,et al.  Background to Qualitative Decision Theory , 1999, AI Mag..

[12]  Moshe Tennenholtz On Stable Social Laws and Qualitative Equilibrium for Risk-Averse Agents , 1996, KR.

[13]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[14]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[15]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  An automated negotiator for an international crisis , 2002, AAAI/IAAI.

[16]  Ronen I. Brafman,et al.  An axiomatic treatment of three qualitative decision criteria , 2000, JACM.

[17]  Craig Boutilier,et al.  Cooperative Negotiation in Autonomic Systems using Incremental Utility Elicitation , 2002, UAI.

[18]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Bargaining with incomplete information , 2005, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[19]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. , 1958 .