A novel GuttaFlow sealer supports cell survival and attachment.

[1]  D. Chappard,et al.  Effects of Roughness, Fibronectin and Vitronectin on Attachment, Spreading, and Proliferation of Human Osteoblast-Like Cells (Saos-2) on Titanium Surfaces , 1999, Calcified Tissue International.

[2]  C. Rodrigues,et al.  Long-term dose- and time-dependent effects of endodontic sealers in human in vitro osteoclastogenesis. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  N. Moradimajd,et al.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of three resin-based sealers on an L929 cell line , 2012, Dental research journal.

[4]  R. Hickel,et al.  No evidence for DNA double-strand breaks caused by endodontic sealers. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  J. D. PÉcora,et al.  Changes in the surface of four calcium silicate-containing endodontic materials and an epoxy resin-based sealer after a solubility test. , 2012, International endodontic journal.

[6]  Yu-Hsiung Wang,et al.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of Gutta Flow and Endo Sequence BC sealers. , 2011, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[7]  B. Willershausen,et al.  In vitro analysis of the cytotoxicity and the antimicrobial effect of four endodontic sealers , 2011, Head & face medicine.

[8]  F. Şahin,et al.  Cytotoxicity of 5 endodontic sealers on L929 cell line and human dental pulp cells. , 2011, International endodontic journal.

[9]  Chen-Ying Wang,et al.  A novel urethane acrylate-based root canal sealer with improved degree of conversion, cytotoxicity, bond strengths, solubility, and dimensional stability. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  M. Barbeck,et al.  Tissue reaction to sealing materials: different view at biocompatibility , 2010, European journal of medical research.

[11]  M. Brackett,et al.  Cytotoxic response of three cell lines exposed in vitro to dental endodontic sealers. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[12]  G. Omurtag,et al.  Comparision of biocompatibility and cytotoxicity of two new root canal sealers. , 2010, Acta histochemica.

[13]  B. Peng,et al.  Ex vivo cytotoxicity of a new calcium silicate-based canal filling material. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[14]  H. Darmani,et al.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of various resin based root canal sealers. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[15]  V. Kašuba,et al.  In vitro genotoxicity of root canal sealers. , 2009, International endodontic journal.

[16]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Toxicity evaluation of root canal sealers in vitro. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[17]  Renato de Toledo Leonardo,et al.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of four endodontic sealers. , 2008, Brazilian dental journal.

[18]  F. Tay,et al.  Water sorption and solubility of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Cytotoxicity of new resin-, calcium hydroxide- and silicone-based root canal sealers on fibroblasts derived from human gingiva and L929 cell lines. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[20]  T. Lallier,et al.  A simple cell motility assay demonstrates differential motility of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts, gingival fibroblasts, and pre-osteoblasts , 2007, Cell and Tissue Research.

[21]  F. Tay,et al.  Initial in vitro biological response to contemporary endodontic sealers. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[22]  M. Osmak,et al.  The cytotoxicity of RoekoSeal and AH plus compared during different setting periods. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  J. Jeng,et al.  Effects of root-end filling materials and eugenol on mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity and cytotoxicity to human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[24]  C. Kao,et al.  Root canal sealers induce cytotoxicity and necrosis , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[25]  B. Jeansonne,et al.  Adhesion of human fibroblasts to root-end-filling materials. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  C. Stanford,et al.  Effects of Implant Microtopography on Osteoblast Cell Attachment , 2003, Implant dentistry.

[27]  A. Kalayci,et al.  A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of two root canal sealers. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[28]  M. Chou,et al.  Cytotoxicity of resin-, zinc oxide-eugenol-, and calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells and permanent V79 cells. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[29]  C. Kao,et al.  The biocompatibility evaluation of epoxy resin-based root canal sealers in vitro. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[30]  A Wennerberg,et al.  Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[31]  R. Moses,et al.  Gingival, dermal, and periodontal ligament fibroblasts express different extracellular matrix receptors. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[32]  F. Shokri,et al.  In vitro cytotoxicity of a new epoxy resin root canal sealer. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[33]  F. Vertucci,et al.  Cytotoxicity of endodontic materials. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[34]  G. Leyhausen,et al.  Biological aspects of root canal filling materials – histocompatibility, cytotoxicity, and mutagenicity , 1997, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[35]  B. Willershausen,et al.  Root canal sealer cytotoxicity with human gingival Fibroblasts. III. Calcium hydroxide-based sealers. , 1992, Journal of endodontics.

[36]  B. Willershausen,et al.  Root canal sealer cytotoxicity on human gingival fibroblasts: 2. Silicone- and resin-based sealers. , 1991, Journal of endodontics.