General holistic impairment in congenital prosopagnosia: Evidence from Garner's speeded-classification task

Congenital prosopagnosia (CP), a lifelong impairment in face processing in the absence of brain damage, is often ascribed to impairment in holistic processing. It is still debated whether such difficulties are restricted to faces or whether they can also be observed for nonfacial stimuli. Here, we investigate this issue by examining CP individuals and their controls on two variations of the Garner speeded classification task tailored to assess holistic processing of nonfacial stimuli. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to judge the width of visually presented rectangles while ignoring their irrelevant height, or to judge changes in width while height remained constant. Critically, while controls exhibited the expected Garner interference, no such interference was observed for the CPs, indicating impaired holistic processing of integral, nonfacial shape dimensions. Experiment 2, utilized the same Garner paradigm, but here participants were asked to judge integral dimensions that are unrelated to shape (colour). Importantly, both CPs and controls exhibited the same level of Garner interference, indicating intact integral processing of colour dimensions. This dissociation between the performance on the two Garner tasks indicates that CPs do not exhibit a general local processing bias or impaired integration of any perceptual dimensions, but rather a deficit that is restricted to tasks requiring holistic integral perception of shape dimensions. Taken together, these results provide evidence for the existence of a general impairment in holistic shape perception in CP, which may be related to the mechanisms underlying this disorder.

[1]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Holistic face perception , 2015 .

[2]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Structural and functional impairment of the face processing network in congenital prosopagnosia , 2014 .

[3]  F. Hadj-Bouziane,et al.  Selective dissociation between core and extended regions of the face processing network in congenital prosopagnosia. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Impairment of the face processing network in congenital prosopagnosia. , 2014, Frontiers in bioscience.

[5]  J. Wilmer,et al.  Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability , 2013, Cognition.

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Face gender recognition in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence for holistic processing and use of configural information , 2012 .

[7]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Holistic processing of the mouth but not the eyes in developmental prosopagnosia , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[8]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[9]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Covert face recognition in congenital prosopagnosia: A group study , 2012, Cortex.

[10]  Ruosi Wang,et al.  Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict Face Recognition Ability , 2012, Psychological science.

[11]  K. Murphy,et al.  The effect of target context and cue type in a postcue word pronunciation task , 2011, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[12]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Fusiform Gyrus Face Selectivity Relates to Individual Differences in Facial Recognition Ability , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Perceptual Expertise as a Shift From Strategic Interference to Automatic Holistic Processing , 2011, Current directions in psychological science.

[15]  Elinor McKone,et al.  Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  T. Elze,et al.  Deficits in Long-Term Recognition Memory Reveal Dissociated Subtypes in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: Evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Tirta Susilo,et al.  Solving the upside-down puzzle: Why do upright and inverted face aftereffects look alike? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[19]  B. Rossion,et al.  Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect , 2010, Cortex.

[20]  B. Rossion,et al.  Impaired holistic processing of unfamiliar individual faces in acquired prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  C. Macrae,et al.  Processing style and person recognition: Exploring the face inversion effect , 2010 .

[22]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry reveals reduced grey matter volume in the temporal cortex of developmental prosopagnosics , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  A comparative case study of face recognition: The contribution of configural and part-based recognition systems, and their interaction , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Impairments of Biological Motion Perception in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2009, PloS one.

[25]  Douglas Martin,et al.  Some witnesses are better than others , 2009 .

[26]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  What is Meant by Impaired Configural Processing in Acquired Prosopagnosia? , 2009, Perception.

[27]  W. Tryon,et al.  An inferential confidence interval method of establishing statistical equivalence that corrects Tryon's (2001) reduction factor. , 2008, Psychological methods.

[28]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Cognitive heterogeneity in genetically based prosopagnosia: a family study. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[29]  J. Barton Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[30]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Independent Processing of Form, Colour, and Texture in Object Perception , 2008, Perception.

[31]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[32]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Family resemblance: Ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[33]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Dorsal and Ventral Processing Under Dual-Task Conditions , 2007, Psychological science.

[34]  B. Stephan,et al.  The recognition of emotional expression in prosopagnosia: Decoding whole and part faces , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[35]  Catherine J. Mondloch,et al.  What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[36]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia: a window to content-specific face processing , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Specialized Face Perception Mechanisms Extract Both Part and Spacing Information: Evidence from Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  U. Frith,et al.  Vagaries of Visual Perception in Autism , 2005, Neuron.

[39]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Brad Duchaine,et al.  Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  J. Keenan,et al.  Perception of global facial geometry in the inversion effect and prosopagnosia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Andrea Weidenfeld,et al.  An evaluation of two commonly used tests of unfamiliar face recognition , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape , 2003, Nature.

[45]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Face context interferes with local part processing in a prosopagnosic patient , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Avi Chaudhuri,et al.  The influence of attention on holistic face encoding , 2002, Cognition.

[48]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  W. Tryon Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[50]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[51]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[53]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[54]  B. Burns,et al.  Dimensional interactions and the structure of psychological space: The representation of hue, saturation, and brightness , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[56]  J R Dykes,et al.  A demonstration of selection of analyzers for integral dimensions. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[59]  Gary L. Felfoldy Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli , 1974 .

[60]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[61]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Too Many Trees to See the Forest: Performance, Event-related Potential, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Integrative Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  N. Macmillan,et al.  The mean-integral representation of rectangles , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.