Effect of flavour manipulation on ENDS (JUUL) users’ experiences, puffing behaviour and nicotine exposure among US college students

Significance Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use has continued to increase exponentially among young people in the USA, with unique flavours being one of the most cited reasons for use. Yet, controlled studies examining the effects of restricting flavour are lacking. This study evaluates the impact of ENDS flavour manipulation on user’s puffing behaviour, subjective experience, harm perception and nicotine exposure among college-aged ENDS users. Methods JUUL users (n=30, age 18 to 24 years) attended two 60 min ad libitum ENDS use sessions (JUUL preferred flavour vs JUUL classic tobacco flavour) in a cross-over design. Puff topography and plasma nicotine concentration were measured, and participants completed subjective experience questionnaires. Results Increases were observed on measures of satisfaction, taste, enjoyment, urges to vape/smoke, pleasure, product appeal and increased concentration following using the preferred flavour pod (p values <0.05). Compared with preferred flavour, participants in the tobacco flavour were less motivated to use it in the future (70.9 vs 19.1 scores, p<0.001), even if it was the only product on the market (75.8 vs 30.7 scores, p<0.001). While nicotine levels significantly increased in both conditions from pre to post session (p values <0.001), no significant differences were observed in nicotine boost levels or on puff topography parameters when comparing both flavour conditions. Conclusions This pilot study provides evidence that ENDS flavours have a substantial effect in enhancing young current ENDS users’ experiences, product appeal and motivation to use the product in the future. It highlights that limiting flavours could play a potential role when designing strategic policies to reduce the appeal of ENDS use among young people.

[1]  J. Hart,et al.  The role of flavors in vaping initiation and satisfaction among U.S. adults. , 2019, Addictive behaviors.

[2]  K. A. Cullen,et al.  Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students — 
United States, 2019 , 2019, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.

[3]  Brian A. King,et al.  e-Cigarette Use Among Youth in the United States, 2019. , 2019, JAMA.

[4]  M. Goniewicz,et al.  Use of Flavored E-Cigarettes and the Type of E-Cigarette Devices Used among Adults and Youth in the US—Results from Wave 3 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2015–2016) , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  B. Halpern-Felsher,et al.  Popular Flavors Used in Alternative Tobacco Products Among Young Adults. , 2019, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[6]  J. Barrington-Trimis,et al.  A Review of the Use and Appeal of Flavored Electronic Cigarettes , 2019, Current Addiction Reports.

[7]  J. Constantino,et al.  Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 4 Years — Early Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, Seven Sites, United States, 2010, 2012, and 2014 , 2019, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.

[8]  B. Halpern-Felsher,et al.  Youth say ads for flavored e-liquids are for them. , 2019, Addictive behaviors.

[9]  E. Hahn,et al.  E-cigarettes and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: What Clinicians and Researchers Need to Know , 2019, Current Atherosclerosis Reports.

[10]  S. Soneji,et al.  Use of Flavored E-Cigarettes Among Adolescents, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Findings From the Population Assessment for Tobacco and Health Study , 2019, Public health reports.

[11]  E. Benjamin,et al.  Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With Subsequent Initiation of Tobacco Cigarettes in US Youths , 2019, JAMA network open.

[12]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Impact of e-liquid flavors on e-cigarette vaping behavior. , 2018, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[13]  W. Maziak,et al.  Flavored Versus Non-Flavored Waterpipe Tobacco: A Comparison of Toxicant Exposure, Puff Topography, Subjective Experiences and Harm Perceptions. , 2018, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[14]  D. Eaton,et al.  Public Health Consequences of e-Cigarette Use , 2018, JAMA internal medicine.

[15]  Y. O. Lee,et al.  Effect of e-liquid flavor on electronic cigarette topography and consumption behavior in a 2-week natural environment switching study , 2018, PloS one.

[16]  Shu-Hong Zhu,et al.  Evolution of Electronic Cigarette Brands From 2013-2014 to 2016-2017: Analysis of Brand Websites , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  P. Jatlow,et al.  Studying the interactive effects of menthol and nicotine among youth: An examination using e-cigarettes. , 2017, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[18]  Micah L. Berman,et al.  Consumers’ Preferences for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Product Features: A Structured Content Analysis , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[19]  T. Wagener,et al.  Comparison of a preferred versus non-preferred waterpipe tobacco flavour: subjective experience, smoking behaviour and toxicant exposure , 2017, Tobacco Control.

[20]  W. Maziak,et al.  Perception, intention and attempts to quit smoking among Jordanian adolescents from the Irbid Longitudinal Study. , 2016, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[21]  Raina D. Pang,et al.  Effects of sweet flavorings and nicotine on the appeal and sensory properties of e-cigarettes among young adult vapers: Application of a novel methodology. , 2016, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[22]  C. Dresler,et al.  Flavour preferences in youth versus adults: a review , 2016, Tobacco Control.

[23]  J. Audrain-McGovern,et al.  The impact of flavoring on the rewarding and reinforcing value of e-cigarettes with nicotine among young adult smokers. , 2016, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[24]  Jennifer B. Unger,et al.  E-Cigarettes and Future Cigarette Use , 2016, Pediatrics.

[25]  S. Loughlin,et al.  Nicotine and the adolescent brain , 2015, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  J. Samet,et al.  Flavorings in electronic cigarettes: an unrecognized respiratory health hazard? , 2014, JAMA.

[27]  Anthony Gamst,et al.  Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[28]  K. Farsalinos,et al.  Impact of Flavour Variability on Electronic Cigarette Use Experience: An Internet Survey , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[29]  P. Ling,et al.  Perceptions of relative risk of snus and cigarettes among US smokers. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[30]  M. Azab,et al.  CO exposure and puff topography are associated with Lebanese waterpipe dependence scale score. , 2013, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[31]  Prue Talbot,et al.  Metal and Silicate Particles Including Nanoparticles Are Present in Electronic Cigarette Cartomizer Fluid and Aerosol , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  Andrzej Sobczak,et al.  Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[33]  Thomas Eissenberg,et al.  Nicotine exposure in daily waterpipe smokers and its relation to puff topography. , 2011, Addictive behaviors.

[34]  T. Eissenberg,et al.  A Clinical Laboratory Model for Evaluating the Acute Effects of Electronic “Cigarettes”: Nicotine Delivery Profile and Cardiovascular and Subjective Effects , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[35]  L. Johnston,et al.  Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2018: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-60 , 2005 .

[36]  Charbel Antonios,et al.  A portable, low-resistance puff topography instrument for pulsating, high-flow smoking devices , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[37]  Jennifer Malson,et al.  Bidis—hand-rolled, Indian cigarettes: Effects on physiological, biochemical and subjective measures , 2002, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[38]  I. Berlin,et al.  Sensory and physiologic effects of menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes with differing nicotine delivery , 2002, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[39]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Simultaneous determination of mecamylamine, nicotine, and cotinine in plasma by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.