STAP with medium PRF mode for non-side-looking airborne radar

Space-time adaptive processing (STAP) has been widely discussed for airborne radar systems to improve the system performance of detecting targets. This is especially true for airborne early warning (AEW) radar, which should find long-range and small radar cross section (RCS) targets such as the stealth aircraft and missiles. However, in existing airborne radar literature, STAP is mainly considered for clutter and jamming rejection in side-looking airborne radar (SLAR) applications. There have been fewer discussions on airborne radar with non-side-ways looking array radar (non-SLAR). The STAP of non-SLAR such as forward looking array radar is also very important and can not be avoided for airborne radar to detect targets in all directions. The STAP of the non-SLAR is studied here. A scheme has been proposed, which is processed by the way of STAP combined with multiple staggered medium pulse repetition frequencies (PRFs). We further study the selection of PRFs in order to make the scheme more available for non-SLAR radar. We analyze two typical non-SLAR cases, i.e., inclined-sideways looking array and forward looking array. We examine this scheme by comparing the performances of three processing systems under the criteria of range-velocity blind zone minimization. Computer simulation results show the multiple-PRFs STAP scheme is feasible for non-SLAR and can be applied to phased-array AEW radar systems.

[1]  Y.-N. Peng,et al.  Space-time adaptive processing for airborne radar with various array orientations , 1997 .

[2]  D. Lamensdorf,et al.  Adaptive Space-Time Processing for Airborne Radar. , 1996 .

[3]  I. Reed,et al.  Rapid Convergence Rate in Adaptive Arrays , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  J. S. Goldstein,et al.  Theory of partially adaptive radar , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  Peter Weber,et al.  Airborne ground moving target indication using non-side-looking antennas , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Radar Conference, RADARCON'98. Challenges in Radar Systems and Solutions (Cat. No.98CH36197).

[6]  S.A. Hovanessian,et al.  Medium PRF Performance Analysis , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  Hong Wang,et al.  On adaptive spatial-temporal processing for airborne surveillance radar systems , 1994 .

[8]  S. D. Hayward,et al.  Adaptive space time processing for forward looking radar , 1995, Proceedings International Radar Conference.

[9]  L. E. Brennan,et al.  Adaptive arrays in airborne MTI radar , 1976 .

[10]  Richard Klemm,et al.  Space-time adaptive processing : principles and applications , 1998 .

[11]  R.C. DiPietro,et al.  Extended factored space-time processing for airborne radar systems , 1992, [1992] Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers.

[12]  A. Haimovich,et al.  The eigencanceler: adaptive radar by eigenanalysis methods , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  Wang Yongliang,et al.  Adaptive space-time processing for non-side-looking airborne radar , 1996, Proceedings of International Radar Conference.

[15]  Richard Klemm,et al.  Introduction to space-time adaptive processing , 1998 .

[16]  Guy V. Morris,et al.  Airborne Pulsed Doppler Radar , 1989 .

[17]  Bao Zheng,et al.  The practical approaches of space-time signal processing for airborne array radar , 1995, Proceedings International Radar Conference.

[18]  Yingning Peng,et al.  Space-time joint processing method for simultaneous clutter and jamming rejection in airborne radar , 1996 .

[19]  Wang Yongliang,et al.  Method for simultaneous clutter and jamming rejection in airborne radar , 1995 .

[20]  R. Klemm Adaptive airborne MTI: comparison of sideways and forward looking radar , 1995, Proceedings International Radar Conference.