Dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride. II. Carcass composition and meat palatability of beef cattle.

Experiments were conducted at 3 US locations (California, Idaho, and Texas) to determine the effects of dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride and duration of zilpaterol feeding on carcass composition and beef palatability. At each site, 160 steers and 160 heifers were stratified within sex by initial BW (study d -1) and assigned randomly within BW strata to 1 of 4 treatments in a randomized complete block design (4 blocks/treatment for each sex). The 4 treatments were arranged in a 2 (no zilpaterol vs. zilpaterol) x 2 (20- or 40-d duration of zilpaterol feeding) factorial. When included in the diet, zilpaterol was supplemented at 8.3 mg/kg (DM basis). Each pen consisted of 10 animals. After slaughter 2 carcasses per pen (n=64 per trial site) were selected. The entire right side of the selected carcasses was collected for dissection and chemical analysis of the soft tissue. Additionally, the left strip loin was collected for Warner-Bratzler shear force determinations and aged to 28 d postmortem. Sensory analysis was conducted on the Idaho trial site samples only. All data were pooled for analyses. Feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride increased carcass muscle deposition (P<0.01) of both steer and heifer carcasses. However, carcass percentage fat of steers and heifers was not affected (P>0.11) by the zilpaterol treatment. In heifer carcasses, carcass moisture percentage was increased (P=0.04) and bone percentage was decreased (P=0.02), whereas in steer carcasses, carcass moisture and bone percentage were not affected (P>0.10). In heifer carcasses, carcass ash percentage was not affected (P=0.61) by zilpaterol, whereas in steer carcasses, carcass ash percentage tended (P=0.07) to be increased. The protein-to-bone ratio was increased (P<0.001) by zilpaterol hydrochloride treatment in both steers and heifers, whereas the protein-to-fat ratio was not affected (P=0.10). Cooking loss of the LM was not affected (P=0.41) by zilpaterol treatment of steers or heifers. However, LM Warner-Bratzler shear force was increased (P=0.003) on average (3.3 vs. 4.0 kg) due to zilpaterol hydrochloride treatment of both steers and heifers. In both steers and heifers, LM sensory panel scores of overall juiciness (6.2 vs. 6.0), tenderness (6.2 vs. 6.0), and flavor intensity (6.2 vs. 6.0) tended (P=0.06) to be decreased in cattle supplemented with zilpaterol. Zilpaterol hydrochloride is a repartitioning agent that seems to affect carcass composition primarily through protein deposition. However, zilpaterol treatment can adversely affect tenderness and other palatability traits.

[1]  C. Krehbiel,et al.  Effects of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride with and without monensin and tylosin on carcass cutability and meat palatability of beef steers. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[2]  T. Terhune,et al.  Dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride. I. Feedlot performance and carcass traits of steers and heifers. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[3]  P. H. Robinson,et al.  Effects of two beta-adrenergic agonists on finishing performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of feedlot steers. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[4]  L. Tedeschi,et al.  The effects of implant strategy on finished body weight of beef cattle. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[5]  M. Miller,et al.  Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[6]  L. Tedeschi,et al.  Predicting individual feed requirements of cattle fed in groups. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[7]  I. Jaime,et al.  Textural assessment of clenbuterol treatment in beef. , 1999, Meat science.

[8]  R. Zinn,et al.  INFLUENCE OF THE $-AGONIST, ZILPATEROL, ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF FEEDLOT STEERS , 1999 .

[9]  J. Craigon,et al.  The effect of immunization against somatostatin and β-agonist administration alone and in combination on growth and carcass composition in young steers , 1997 .

[10]  B. Cottyn,et al.  The effect of the β-adrenergic agonist cimaterol on performance and carcass and meat quality in culled dairy cows , 1995 .

[11]  R. Moermans,et al.  Effect of cimaterol on growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality in double-muscled Belgian White-blue bulls , 1994 .

[12]  M. Vestergaard,et al.  Growth, composition and eating quality of Longissimus dorsi from young bulls fed the β-agonist cimaterol at consecutive developmental stages. , 1994, Meat science.

[13]  R. L. Joseph,et al.  Carcass and meat quality of finishing Friesian steers fed the β-adrenergic agonist L-644,969. , 1994, Meat science.

[14]  R. L. Joseph,et al.  Long-term effects of cimaterol in Friesian steers: II. Carcass composition and meat quality. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[15]  J. Culioli,et al.  Performance, muscle composition and meat texture in veal calves administered a β-agonist (clenbuterol). , 1993, Meat science.

[16]  M. Miller,et al.  Adipose tissue cellularity and muscle growth in young steers fed the beta-adrenergic agonist clenbuterol for 50 days and after 78 days of withdrawal. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[17]  P. Allen,et al.  Growth, feed efficiency and carcass composition of finishing Friesian steers fed the beta-adrenergic agonist L-644,969. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[18]  B. Cottyn,et al.  Effect of a β-agonist on meat quality and myofibrillar protein fragmentation in bulls. , 1990, Meat science.

[19]  M. Miller,et al.  Adipose tissue, longissimus muscle and anterior pituitary growth and function in clenbuterol-fed heifers. , 1988, Journal of animal science.

[20]  R. H. Dalrymple,et al.  Use of a β-Agonist to Alter Fat and Muscle Deposition in Steers1, 2 , 1984 .

[21]  W. Horwitz.  Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .