Monitoring dynamic and quasi-static deformations of large flexible engineering structures with GPS: Accuracy, limitations and promises

Abstract During the last few years the kinematic versions (real time kinematic (RTK) and post-processing kinematic (PPK) modes) of the satellite Global Positioning System (GPS) have been used to monitor quasi-static and dynamic deformations of large slender engineering structures. However, the accuracy of the method, the outlier level (including missed and false alarms) and its limitations have not been statistically determined. For this reason we made a large number of experiments, in which harmonic movements were simulated by a rotating GPS receiver antenna, and the recorded coordinates were compared with the real ones. The outcome of this study is that in mid-latitude regions ( φ 5 0 ∘ ) a simple monitoring system consisting of two GPS receivers and a commercial data processing software permits a standard accuracy of up to 15 mm and 35 mm in horizontal and vertical coordinates, respectively, at 1.5% outlier level. Harmonic frequencies in the range 0.1 Hz f 0.5 Hz to approximately 2 Hz can also be determined. Summarizing previous research, an outcome of this study is that GPS results can be confirmed by accelerometer data and can shed light on problems such as Karman vortex vibrations, earthquake-induced oscillations and quasi-static deformations of most slender engineering structures. In addition, the GPS may prove very useful in view of recent trends for displacement deformation-based antiseismic design.

[1]  Pedro Elosegui,et al.  Detection of transient motions with the Global Positioning System , 1996 .

[2]  Gunther Greulich.  Discussion: Dynamic Deformation Monitoring of Tall Structure Using GPS Technology , 1997 .

[3]  Y. Bock,et al.  Anatomy of apparent seasonal variations from GPS‐derived site position time series , 2001 .

[4]  Duncan Carr Agnew,et al.  Application of the global positioning system to crustal deformation measurement: 1. Precision and accuracy , 1991 .

[5]  Paul Cross,et al.  A METHODOLOGY FOR BENCHMARKING REAL TIME KINEMATIC GPS , 1999 .

[6]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Monitoring Structural Deformation at Pacoima Dam, California Using Continuous GPS , 1998 .

[7]  Gérard Lachapelle,et al.  Dynamic Deformation Monitoring of Tall Structure Using GPS Technology , 1995 .

[8]  Gang-Ding Peng,et al.  Seismic Response of a Tower as Measured by an Integrated RTK-GPS System , 2004 .

[9]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  DEFORMATION-CONTROLLED EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN OF RC BUILDINGS , 1999 .

[10]  Richard A. Snay,et al.  Accuracy of GPS-derived relative positions as a function of interstation distance and observing-session duration , 2001 .

[11]  L. Xu,et al.  TIME–FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF A SUSPENSION BRIDGE BASED ON GPS , 2002 .

[12]  Z. Kapović,et al.  Combination of GPS and Precise Levelling in Measurements of Vertical Bridge Deformations , 2000 .

[13]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Crustal deformation measurements in central Japan determined by a Global Positioning System Fixed-Point Network , 1992 .

[14]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Inelastic spectra for displacement based seismic design , 2001 .

[15]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Measurements of static and dynamic displacement from visual monitoring of the Humber Bridge , 1993 .

[16]  Maria Tsakiri,et al.  Evaluation of dynamic response and local soil effects of the Evripos cable-stayed bridge using multi-sensor monitoring systems , 2005 .

[17]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Observed discrepancy between Geodolite and GPS distance measurements , 1996 .

[18]  Alan Dodson,et al.  Impact of GPS satellite and pseudolite geometry on structural deformation monitoring: analytical and empirical studies , 2004 .

[19]  Shun-ichi Nakamura,et al.  GPS MEASUREMENT OF WIND-INDUCED SUSPENSION BRIDGE GIRDER DISPLACEMENTS , 2000 .

[20]  Edward M. Mikhail,et al.  Observations And Least Squares , 1983 .

[21]  G. Roberts,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL MONITORING OF THE HUMBER BRIDGE USING GPS. , 1997 .

[22]  Alan Dodson,et al.  Twist and deflect: monitoring motion of the Humber Bridge , 1999 .

[23]  Stathis C. Stiros,et al.  Kinematics of two deep-seated landslides in Greece , 2007 .

[24]  Chris Rizos,et al.  Real-Time Long-Term Monitoring of Static and Dynamic Displacements of an Office Tower, Combining RTK GPS and Accelerometer Data , 2004 .

[25]  David M. Boore,et al.  Some Observations on Colocated and Closely Spaced Strong Ground- Motion Records of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2003 .

[26]  Kristine M. Larson,et al.  Modeling the rupture process of the 2003 September 25 Tokachi‐Oki (Hokkaido) earthquake using 1‐Hz GPS data , 2004 .

[27]  Gethin Wyn Roberts,et al.  MONITORING OF STRUCTURES USING THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. , 1999 .

[28]  T. Dixon,et al.  Noise in GPS coordinate time series , 1999 .

[29]  K. Hudnut,et al.  Continuous GPS Monitoring of Structural Deformation at Pacoima Dam, California , 1998 .

[30]  G. Veis,et al.  New constraints on the rapid crustal motion of the Aegean region: recent results inferred from GPS measurements (1993–1998) across the West Hellenic Arc, Greece , 1999 .

[31]  F. Brunner,et al.  Experimental Detection of Deformations using GPS , 1998 .

[32]  Stathis C. Stiros,et al.  Estimating the Optimum Duration of GPS Static Observations for Short Baseline Length Determination in Greece , 2004 .

[33]  Mehmet Çelebi,et al.  GPS in Pioneering Dynamic Monitoring of Long-Period Structures , 2002 .

[34]  Paul Reynolds,et al.  Vibration serviceability of footbridges under human-induced excitation : a literature review , 2005 .

[35]  T. Chmielewski,et al.  Application of GPS technology to measurements of displacements of high-rise structures due to weak winds , 2002 .

[36]  Y. Tamura,et al.  Measurement of Wind-induced Response of Buildings using RTK-GPS , 2001 .

[37]  Chris Rizos,et al.  GPS seismometers with up to 20 Hz sampling rate , 2000 .