Investigation of the 176Yb Interference Correction during Determination of the 176Hf/177Hf Ratio by Laser Ablation and Solution Analysis on the Neoma MC-ICP-MS

We utilized the Neoma™, a recently released MC-ICP-MS platform offered by ThermoFisher Scientific, to assess the behavior of the Lu-Yb-Hf system during laser ablation analyses of various zircon standards as well as solution-based analyses of the JMC-475 Hf standard doped with varying quantities of Yb and Lu. The primary goal of this work was to characterize the behavior of the Yb interference correction on the Neoma™ platform since this is one of the biggest issues in the Hf isotope analysis community and because the Neoma™ platform will supplant the Neptune™ series instrument. During laser ablation analysis, we found that the overall data quality scales proportionally with the total Hf signal intensity, with higher signal analyses producing extremely accurate (within 1 εHf unit) and precise (sub εHf unit within-run standard errors) data. At low Yb signals (<0.1 V 173Yb), we were not able to produce an accurate internal Yb mass bias factor. However, utilizing an empirical approach allows for the application of session-specific relationships between the Yb and Hf mass bias factors, determined by analysis of standards of varying Yb content, to produce accurate εHf values from zircons with higher Yb/Hf ratios even where the total Hf signal intensity is relatively low. Similar behavior was observed in the solution analyses. Lastly, while the behavior of the Yb interference correction on the Neoma™ platform appears comparable to the Neptune™ series MC-ICP-MS, further work will help refine the understanding of the controls on mass bias behavior, oxide formation, session-to-session stability, etc.

[1]  V. Balaram,et al.  Recent advances in MC-ICP-MS applications in Earth and environmental sciences: Challenges and solutions , 2021, Geosystems and Geoenvironment.

[2]  C. Kirkland,et al.  Strategies towards robust interpretations of in situ zircon Lu–Hf isotope analyses , 2020, Geoscience Frontiers.

[3]  M. Horstwood,et al.  Small-volume Lu-Hf and U-Pb Isotope Determination of Complex Zircons by Solution and Laser Ablation MC-ICP-MS , 2018, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[4]  D. McInerney,et al.  Strengths and limitations of zircon Lu-Hf and O isotopes in modelling crustal growth , 2016 .

[5]  J. Scoates,et al.  Zircon Hf isotope evidence for an enriched mantle source for the Bushveld Igneous Complex , 2014, Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.

[6]  J. Vervoort,et al.  Guidelines for reporting zircon Hf isotopic data by LA-MC-ICPMS and potential pitfalls in the interpretation of these data , 2014 .

[7]  N. Pearson,et al.  Reassessment of relative oxide formation rates and molecular interferences on in situ lutetium-hafnium analysis with laser ablation MC-ICP-MS , 2013 .

[8]  Shan Gao,et al.  Improved in situ Hf isotope ratio analysis of zircon using newly designed X skimmer cone and jet sample cone in combination with the addition of nitrogen by laser ablation multiple collector ICP-MS , 2012 .

[9]  A. Bouvier,et al.  The Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd isotopic composition of CHUR: Constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets , 2008 .

[10]  J. Blichert‐Toft The Hf isotopic composition of zircon reference material 91500 , 2008 .

[11]  M. Whitehouse,et al.  Plesovice zircon : A new natural reference material for U-Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis , 2008 .

[12]  D. Weis,et al.  Hf and Lu isotopic reference values for the zircon standard 91500 by MC-ICP-MS , 2004 .

[13]  F. Albarède,et al.  Separation of Hf and Lu for high-precision isotope analysis of rock samples by magnetic sector-multiple collector ICP-MS , 1997 .

[14]  P. Patchett,et al.  Lu/hf in Chondrites and Definition of a Chondritic Hafnium Growth Curve , 1981 .