Improved Velocity and Displacement Time Histories in Frequency Domain Spectral-Matching Procedures

Existing spectral-matching techniques in the frequency domain distort the displacement time history of the ground motions. In the time domain spectral- matching procedures, scale functions (wavelets) are additive and, with an appropriate scale functional form, extra displacement will not be imposed to the record. However, matching in the frequency domain with a multiplicative scale function applied to the Fourier spectrum requires a special attention in the matching process to have control on the displacement time history. This study shows that thevelocity value at the end of the record is not affected by the Fourier amplitude spectrum scaling, but the displace- ment may linearly increase (or decrease) boundlessly. Two numerical solutions are proposed to solve the displacement drift problem in the frequency domain. Following the proposed frequency domain baseline correction procedure, one does not need to perform baseline correction in the time domain after completing the spectral matching. As a result, acceleration, velocity, and displacement time histories will remain fully compatible, and the boundary conditions of the velocity and displacement time histories will be preserved. The proposed procedure is not limited to spectral-matching methods and can be used with any general filtering process to retain the final dis- placement of the record. The possibility of applying a zero-padding technique to the spectral-matching filter is also discussed. It is shown that applying an appropriate window along with the zero-padding technique can lead to a reasonable displacement time history. The proposed procedures can be easily added to the existing or new frequency domain spectral-matching algorithms without significantly disrupting the spectral-matching process.

[1]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .

[2]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  DO SCALED AND SPECTRUM-MATCHED NEAR-SOURCE RECORDS PRODUCE BIASED NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL RESPONSES? , 2005 .

[3]  George Mylonakis,et al.  Response spectrum of incompatible acceleration, velocity and displacement histories by Praveen K. Malhotra, Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 2001; 30(2):279–286 , 2002 .

[4]  David M. Boore,et al.  On Pads and Filters: Processing Strong-Motion Data , 2005 .

[5]  David M. Boore,et al.  SMSIM — Fortran Programs for Simulating Ground Motions from Earthquakes: Version 2.3 — A Revision of OFR 96–80–A , 2000 .

[6]  M. K. Kaul Spectrum-Consistent Time-History Generation , 1978 .

[7]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  BIAS CAUSED BY USE OF SPECTRUM COMPATIBLE MOTIONS , 2006 .

[8]  Bruce A. Bolt,et al.  SYNTHESIZED STRONG GROUND MOTIONS FOR THE SEISMIC CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY BRIDGE. , 1993 .

[9]  Praveen K. Malhotra,et al.  Response spectrum of incompatible acceleration, velocity and displacement histories , 2001 .

[10]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences , 2005 .

[11]  JONATHAN HANCOCK,et al.  AN IMPROVED METHOD OF MATCHING RESPONSE SPECTRA OF RECORDED EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION USING WAVELETS , 2006 .

[12]  Walter J Silva,et al.  State-of-the-Art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States. Report 24. WES RASCAL Code for Synthesizing Earthquake Ground Motions. , 1987 .

[13]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  On the Use of Design Spectrum Compatible Time Histories , 1995 .

[14]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  THE USE OF REAL EARTHQUAKE ACCELEROGRAMS AS INPUT TO DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2004 .