An experimental comparison of complex excitation sequences for eddy current testing

Eddy Current Testing (ECT) is a Non Destructive technique widely used in many industrial application fields in which it is very important to detect the presence of thin defects (generally called cracks) in conductive materials. Features of this technique are the cost-effective implementation and the kind of retrieved measured data that make possible to estimate the geometrical characteristics of a crack as position, length, width and depth. The analysis of these characteristics allows the user to accept or discard realized components then improving the production chain. To accomplish for this task some aspects have to be taken into account during the measurement process. They mainly concern the realization of suitable measurement setup and post processing stages. As far as the measurement setup is concerned, crucial aspects are the choice of measurement and excitation devices. The choice of optimized excitation devices and strategies is of interest for research on Non Destructive ECT (ND-ECT): together with common aspects as the amplitude and the frequency of the exciting signal, the attention has been paid to issues as the type of signal to be adopted. In particular it has been found as the use of complex excitation signals, meant as signals different from the sinusoidal ones and with wide frequency content, might raise eddy current responses trying to support the measurement, detection and characterization stages when "difficult cases" are explored (i.e. very small and/or annealed cracks). In this paper the authors propose an experimental comparison of different excitation signals designed to improve the quality of experimental data when difficult cases are experienced and, consequently, to obtain a more reliable extraction of defects geometrical features.

[1]  K. A. Bartels,et al.  Multifrequency eddy current image processing techniques for nondestructive evaluation , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  H. Ermert,et al.  Chirp signal matching and signal power optimization in pulse-echo mode ultrasonic nondestructive testing , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Comparison Of Pec And Sfec Nde Techniques , 2009 .

[4]  M Min,et al.  Broadband excitation for short-time impedance spectroscopy , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[5]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  On the use of complex excitation sequences for eddy current testing , 2013 .

[6]  Domingo Guinea,et al.  Multi-modal defect detection of residual oxide scale on a cold stainless steel strip , 2010, Machine Vision and Applications.

[7]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  Improving Performance of GMR Sensors , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[8]  A. V. Pohm,et al.  High-resolution giant magnetoresistance on-chip arrays for magnetic imaging , 2003 .

[9]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  Crack Depth Estimation by Using a Multi-Frequency ECT Method , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  Zhiwei Zeng,et al.  Pulsed Eddy-Current Based Giant Magnetoresistive System for the Inspection of Aircraft Structures , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[11]  Manfred R. Schroeder,et al.  Synthesis of low-peak-factor signals and binary sequences with low autocorrelation (Corresp.) , 1970, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Antonello Tamburrino,et al.  Multi-frequency identification of defects in conducting media , 2008 .

[13]  Pietro Burrascano,et al.  Time domain deconvolution approach relying on Galois sequences , 2007 .

[14]  Wuliang Yin,et al.  Thickness measurement of non-magnetic plates using multi-frequency eddy current sensors , 2007 .

[15]  David Jiles,et al.  Review of magnetic methods for nondestructive evaluation , 1988 .

[16]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  GMR-Based ECT Instrument for Detection and Characterization of Crack on a Planar Specimen: A Hand-Held Solution , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[17]  Pietro Burrascano,et al.  Galois sequences in the non-destructive evaluation of metallic materials , 2006 .

[18]  Junzhe Gao,et al.  Defect identification and classification of multi-frequency eddy current test based on spectrum method , 2010, The 2010 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation.

[19]  David Jiles,et al.  Review of magnetic methods for nondestructive evaluation (Part 2) , 1990 .