Optimizing Open Government: an economic perspective on data sharing

Data has value helping individuals, businesses and government make decisions. Sharing government data can, therefore, enhance its value, providing privacy is safeguarded. Open government data can also enhance equity by reducing the information advantage that large businesses increasingly have over smaller competitors and customers. However, there are costs associated with open data. It must be curated and disseminated. Protecting individual privacy may require aggregation or transformation. There are also different ways of sharing data. At its crudest, this may take the form of providing files, in whatever form, on a website. More usefully and at greater cost, sharing data may take the form of machine-readable APIs. Data services also help users draw insights from data, for example by identifying patterns or trends or highlighting the most salient information. These different sharing models incur different costs to government and users. More accessible data with associated services generally increase the potential benefits to users but will come at some cost to government. From an economic perspective, it will be more efficient if this is done once by the government. However, given the limited budget resources of governments it is worth considering how the process of opening government data could be optimized. The objective of this research is to provide a framework to assist decision-makers responsible for open data. A data prioritization index could assess the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of making particular datasets open. The benefits depend on the extent to which data are likely to be used by citizens, or to enhance competition among firms. The costs include the ICT infrastructure requirements and privacy safeguards needed to make the data open. Ultimately the value of open data will grow as artificial intelligence lowers the cost of drawing insights from it. Open data could also reduce the extent to which a small number of large companies are able to profit from monopolizing their data holdings.

[1]  Nicholas Gruen,et al.  Open research data: Report to the Australian National Data Service (ANDS) , 2014 .

[2]  A. Stott Open data for economic growth , 2014 .

[3]  Todd Sanderson,et al.  Understanding and unlocking the value of public research data: OzNome social architecture report , 2017 .

[4]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Designing electronic government information access programs: a holistic approach , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Raghav Bhaskar,et al.  Noiseless Database Privacy , 2011, ASIACRYPT.

[7]  Tim Churches,et al.  Anonymization for outputs of population health and health services research conducted via an online data center , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Molly K. Macauley,et al.  The Value of Information: A Background Paper on Measuring the Contribution of Space-Derived Earth Science Data to National Resource Management , 2005 .

[9]  Curtis R. Taylor,et al.  The Economics of Privacy , 2016 .

[10]  Randy Holden,et al.  Data-driven innovation : big data for growth and well-being , 2015 .

[11]  A. King Prime minister and cabinet , 1990 .

[12]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The negative effects of open government data - investigating the dark side of open data , 2014, DG.O.

[13]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..