An Underwater Target Detection Framework for Hyperspectral Imagery

One of the biggest challenges in an underwater target detection is that, unlike land-based scenes, the observed spectrum of an underwater target is highly dependent on the particular background that is in the scene. In particular, the observed spectrum is determined by not only the target reflectance signature but also by the optical properties of the water in which it is situated, as well as the depth of the target. It follows that signature-based detection algorithms must be able to accommodate the wide variation of observed spectra that a single target may exhibit in nature, and at any depth. In this article, we present a general framework for underwater detection in hyperspectral remote sensing imagery that uses physics-based modeling to calculate the target space—the set of all possible observed spectra for the target in a given scene—and then uses nonlinear mathematical models to exploit the structure intrinsic to the target space in order to reduce dimensionality and greatly simplify the detection problem. We include a series of simulated target images that demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach for multiple targets and depths.

[1]  Mireille Guillaume,et al.  Underwater Target Detection With Hyperspectral Data: Solutions for Both Known and Unknown Water Quality , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[2]  C. Mobley Hydrolight 4.0 Users Guide , 1998 .

[3]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[4]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[5]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , 2021, Computer Vision.

[6]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[7]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[8]  C. Mobley,et al.  Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters. I. A semianalytical model. , 1998, Applied optics.

[9]  David Gillis A nonlinear modeling framework for the detection of underwater objects in hyperspectral imagery , 2016, SPIE Defense + Security.

[10]  Assefa M. Melesse,et al.  A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Parameters Estimation Using Remote Sensing Techniques , 2016, Sensors.

[11]  M. Montes,et al.  Deriving bathymetry and water properties from hyperspectral imagery by spectral matching using a full radiative transfer model , 2020 .

[12]  C. Mobley Light and Water: Radiative Transfer in Natural Waters , 1994 .

[13]  E. Fry,et al.  Absorption spectrum (380-700 nm) of pure water. II. Integrating cavity measurements. , 1997, Applied optics.

[14]  D. Jupp,et al.  Mapping coral reef benthic substrates using hyperspectral space-borne images and spectral libraries , 2006 .

[15]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Adaptive subspace detectors , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[16]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps and Spectral Techniques for Embedding and Clustering , 2001, NIPS.

[17]  Marcos J. Montes,et al.  Improvements to the Tafkaa Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for Hyperspectral Ocean-Color Data , 2007 .

[18]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Thomas Heege,et al.  Mapping of submerged aquatic vegetation with a physically based process chain , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[20]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[21]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  Semi-Supervised Learning , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[22]  Trijntje Valerie Downes,et al.  Interpretation of hyperspectral remote-sensing imagery by spectrum matching and look-up tables. , 2005, Applied optics.