A scientometric assessment of the Southern Africa Development Community: science in the tip of Africa

This article reports the results of a scientometric assessment of the Southern Africa Development Community countries. The National Science Indicators database of Thomson-Reuters and the online ISI Web of Knowledge are utilized in order to identify the number of publications of the 15 countries over a period of 15 years; the activity and relative impact indicators of 22 scientific disciplines for each country and their collaborative patterns. It is identified that South Africa with 19% of the population in the region is responsible for 60% of the regional GDP and 79% of the regions publications. All countries tend to have the same focus in their disciplinary priorities and underemphasize disciplines such as engineering, materials science and molecular biology. It is expressed concern that the current research infrastructures are inadequate to assist in reaching the objectives developed in the Regional Indicative Strategic Development Plan of the Community.

[1]  Wesley Shrum,et al.  Published as: "View From Afar: 'Visible' Productivity of Scientists in the Developing World." , 2002 .

[2]  Roland Erne,et al.  on the use and abuse of bibliometric performance indicators: a critique of Hix's ‘global ranking of political science departments’ , 2007 .

[3]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  An assessment of the impact and visibility of South African journals , 2005, Scientometrics.

[4]  A. Pouris.  THE WRITING ON THE WALL OF SOUTH AFRICAN SCIENCE : A SCIENTOMETRIC ASSESSMENT , 1996 .

[5]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[6]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  Assessing the knowledge base for biotechnology in South Africa , 2006, Scientometrics.

[7]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators , 1996, Scientometrics.

[8]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators , 2007, Scientometrics.

[9]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  Can the centre–periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany , 2010, Scientometrics.

[10]  Jane M. Russell,et al.  Science in Africa: An overview of mainstream scientific output , 2002, Scientometrics.

[11]  Edward E. David.  A Department of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[12]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  The state of science and technology in Africa (2000–2004): A scientometric assessment , 2009, Scientometrics.

[13]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  South African research in selected scientific areas: Status 1981–2000 , 2004, Scientometrics.

[14]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Caveats for the Use of Citation Indicators in Research and Journal Evaluations , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  András Schubert,et al.  Publication potential—An indicator of scientific strength for cross-national comparisons , 1986, Scientometrics.

[16]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  South African research in the context of Africa and globally , 2008 .

[17]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  Industry work experience and inventive capacity of South African academic researchers , 2007 .