A multi-criteria decision-making model for the justification of lean manufacturing systems

Abstract In recent years, organisations are facing stiff competition in both domestic as well as global markets due to the impact of globalisation and rapid development of technologies. To achieve a competitive advantage over other firms in these circumstances, some managers’ attempt to transform their organisation by implementing highly successful management philosophies proposed by Japanese and Western management gurus, such as Just-In-Time (JIT), Total Quality Management (TQM), Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), Six-Sigma (SS), Lean Manufacturing Systems (LMS) etc. On the other hand, some managers’ bank on highly sophisticated, technology based systems such as Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMS), Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems (CIMS), Information Systems (IS) that enable e-business through the use of software packages for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Customer Relationship Management (CRM) etc. But an intriguing question that has not been answered completely is: ‘how do managers make a decision of implementing a ‘management based and people oriented philosophy and practice’ (say LMS) or a technically sophisticated system (say CIMS)?’ Implementing such massive change management programmes require a strong justification for the managers to convince the top management, as it involves huge investment and creates a longstanding impact on various resources. But such justification problems are quite complex. Traditional techniques cannot be applied as they do not account for intangible factors and benefits offered, which necessitate the use of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) models. Hence in this paper, an attempt has been made to demonstrate the application of a MCDM model, namely, the Performance Value Analysis (PVA) to analyse the alternatives (i.e., change management programmes) based on its impact on various performance measures of an organisation. A detailed algorithm of the PVA model is demonstrated using a case situation, which showed that LMS is the best for the given situation, as it results in overall improvement in the performance of the organisation.

[1]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Manufacturing strategy: Experiences from select indian organizations , 2000 .

[2]  Peter Milling Computer integrated manufacturing in German industry: aspirations and achievements , 1997 .

[3]  J. D. Couger E pluribus computum , 1986 .

[4]  P. L. Primrose Economic Justification of Cellular Manufacturing , 2007 .

[5]  Jack R. Mkrkdtth,et al.  Justification techniques for advanced manufacturing technologies , 1986 .

[6]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  A knowledge-based system for supporting performance measurement of AMT projects: a research agenda , 2001 .

[7]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Productivity gains from flexible manufacturing: Experiences from India , 2004 .

[8]  Salaheldin Ismail Salaheldin,et al.  JIT implementation in Egyptian manufacturing firms: some empirical evidence , 2005 .

[9]  Hamid R. Parsaei,et al.  A justification methodology for automated manufacturing technologies , 1989 .

[10]  G. Michael,et al.  Economic justification of modern computer-based factory automation equipment: A status report , 1985 .

[11]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Implications of organization and human behaviour on the implementation of CIM in SMEs: An empirical analysis , 2001, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[12]  G. Anand,et al.  Performance measurement system for lean manufacturing: a perspective from SMEs , 2008 .

[13]  W. Karwowski,et al.  A methodology for economic justification of flexible manufacturing systems , 1988 .

[14]  Vaibhav Gupta,et al.  Application of value stream mapping for lean operations and cycle time reduction: an Indian case study , 2005 .

[15]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Economic view of CIM system architecture , 1998 .

[16]  J. Antonakis,et al.  Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues , 2006 .

[17]  Yen-Chun Jim Wu,et al.  LEAN MANUFACTURING: A PERSPECTIVE OF LEAN SUPPLIERS , 2003 .

[18]  Paul Forrester,et al.  Strategic and organizational adaptation in CIM systems development , 1997 .

[19]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[20]  Barrie Dale,et al.  Justification of computer-integrated manufacturing: some insights into the practice , 1990 .

[21]  P. A. Moerman Economic evaluation of investments in new production technologies , 1988 .

[22]  Mikell P. Groover,et al.  Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , 1987 .

[23]  Kuldip Singh Sangwan,et al.  Multi-attribute decision models for justification of cellular manufacturing systems , 2004 .

[24]  Albert H. C. Tsang,et al.  TPM implementation in China: a case study , 2000 .

[25]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  Applying lean thinking: a case study of an Indian steel plant , 2004 .

[26]  A. Sohal,et al.  Lean Production: Experience among Australian Organizations , 1994 .

[27]  T. Savolainen Leadership strategies for gaining business excellence through total quality management: A Finnish case study , 2000 .

[28]  Adel Said Elmaghraby,et al.  Justification of Cellular Manufacturing Systems , 1992 .

[29]  Massimo Gastaldi,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation model for flexible manufacturing system design , 1996 .

[30]  Antonio Casimiro Caputo,et al.  Computer integrated manufacturing in small companies: a case study , 1998 .

[31]  Massimo Gastaldi,et al.  Dynamic analysis of the performance of a flexible manufacturing system: a real case application , 1996 .

[32]  Jon C. Yingling,et al.  Quantifying benefits of conversion to lean manufacturing with discrete event simulation: A case study , 2000 .

[33]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Implications of Computer-Integrated Manufacturing in Small and Medium Enterprises: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[34]  Dan Coffey,et al.  Automation, motivation and lean production reconsidered , 2006 .

[35]  Stefano Tonchia,et al.  Lean organization, management by process and performance measurement , 1996 .

[36]  Tomás Bonavía,et al.  An empirical study of lean production in the ceramic tile industry in Spain , 2006 .

[37]  Cipriano Forza,et al.  Work organization in lean production and traditional plants , 1996 .

[38]  Glenn Parry,et al.  Application of lean visual process management tools , 2006 .

[39]  S. Routroy,et al.  Performance value analysis for selection of facilities location in competitive supply chain , 2006 .

[40]  Chwen Sheu,et al.  Integrating six sigma and theory of constraints for continuous improvement: a case study , 2005 .

[41]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  An application of Six Sigma methodology to reduce the engine-overheating problem in an automotive company , 2005 .

[42]  John R. Canada Annotated Bibliography on Justification of Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Systems , 1986 .

[43]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  An investigation into the implementation of computer integrated manufacturing in small and medium enterprises , 1998 .

[44]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance , 2003 .

[45]  Christer Karlsson,et al.  A lean and global smaller firm , 1997 .

[46]  Richard Cooney,et al.  Is “lean” a universal production system?: Batch production in the automotive industry , 2002 .

[47]  R. Smeds Managing Change towards Lean Enterprises , 1994 .

[48]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Lean manufacturing in temperature dependent processes with interruptions , 2003 .

[49]  William Feld,et al.  Lean Manufacturing: Tools, Techniques, and How to Use Them , 2000 .

[50]  Mohsen Attaran,et al.  CIM: getting set for implementation , 1997 .

[51]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Design and Implementation of Computer Integrated Manufacturing in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Case Study , 2000 .

[52]  Kuldip Singh Sangwan,et al.  PERFORMANCE VALUE ANALYSIS FOR THE JUSTIFICATION OF WORLD-CLASS MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 2004 .