Assessing the Role of Taste Intensity and Hedonics in Taste-Shape Correspondences.

Taste liking influences the way in which people match tastes to shapes. However, taste-shape matching cannot be explained entirely by taste hedonics. Here, we assess whether variations in taste intensity influence such crossmodal correspondences. Participants were presented with five basic tastants in two concentrations and had to rate them on roundness/angularity shape scales, as well as in terms of liking, and intensity. The results revealed that taste quality, intensity, and participants' liking of the taste significantly predicted the roundness/angularity of the tastants. The results also revealed a positive correlation between perceived intensity and roundness/angularity for each of the tastants except sweet, and a negative correlation between liking and roundness/angularity for all of the tastes. These results are discussed in terms of the mechanism(s) that underlie the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape.

[1]  P. Sen,et al.  Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis , 1981 .

[2]  M. Lindauer.  The effects of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma on the meanings of neutral stimuli , 1990 .

[3]  Karolin Hoehl,et al.  Water quality and taste sensitivity for basic tastes and metallic sensation , 2010 .

[4]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Music–color associations are mediated by emotion , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal effect of music and odor pleasantness on olfactory quality perception , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[6]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[7]  Rob Comber,et al.  Temporal, affective, and embodied characteristics of taste experiences: a framework for design , 2014, CHI.

[8]  Ulrike Groemping,et al.  Relative Importance for Linear Regression in R: The Package relaimpo , 2006 .

[9]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the shape symbolism of the taste, flavour, and texture of foods and beverages , 2012, Flavour.

[10]  J. Slack,et al.  Allelic Polymorphism within the TAS1R3 Promoter Is Associated with Human Taste Sensitivity to Sucrose , 2009, Current Biology.

[11]  Karin Wendin,et al.  A Comparative Study on Facially Expressed Emotions in Response to Basic Tastes , 2014, Chemosensory Perception.

[12]  D. Zellner,et al.  The Color of Music: Correspondence through Emotion , 2007 .

[13]  Howard R. Moskowitz,et al.  SENSORY INTENSITY VERSUS HEDONIC FUNCTIONS: CLASSICAL PSYCHOPHYSICAL APPROACHES , 1982 .

[14]  C. Spence,et al.  The impact of pleasantness ratings on crossmodal associations between food samples and musical notes , 2012 .

[15]  J. H. Kenneth.  Mental reactions to smell stimuli. , 1923 .

[16]  J. E. Steiner,et al.  Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[17]  C. Spence,et al.  “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners , 2013, Cognition.

[18]  H. L. Jacobs,et al.  Sugar Sweetness and Pleasantness: Evidence for Different Psychological Laws , 1974, Science.

[19]  J. Russell.  Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[20]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Synesthesia: Strong and Weak , 2001 .

[21]  J. Hardin,et al.  Generalized Estimating Equations , 2002 .

[22]  S. S. Stevens.  On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[23]  John Prescott,et al.  Human hedonic responses to sweetness: Role of taste genetics and anatomy , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[24]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  On Perceptual Metaphors , 1996 .

[25]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences: Assessing shape symbolism for cheese , 2013 .

[26]  L. Marks.  The Unity of the Senses , 1978 .

[27]  L. Marks.  The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities , 1978 .

[28]  Geoffrey L. Collier,et al.  Affective synesthesia: Extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli , 1996 .

[29]  John Prescott,et al.  Hedonic responses to taste solutions: a cross-cultural study of Japanese and Australians , 1992 .

[30]  J. Fox,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models , 2008 .

[31]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Taste preferences and food intake. , 1997, Annual review of nutrition.

[32]  C. Spence,et al.  Smelling shapes: crossmodal correspondences between odors and shapes. , 2013, Chemical senses.

[33]  L. Birch.  Development of food preferences. , 1999, Annual review of nutrition.

[34]  C. Spence.  Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[35]  Steve J. Westerman,et al.  Product Design: Preference for Rounded versus Angular Design Elements , 2012 .

[36]  Jasper J. F. van den Bosch,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[37]  A. T. Poffenberger,et al.  The Feeling Value of Lines. , 1924 .

[38]  Charles Spence,et al.  Multisensory product experience , 2008 .

[39]  C. Spence.  Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism , 2012 .

[40]  C. E. Osgood,et al.  Studies in Synesthetic Thinking: II. The Rôle Of Form In Visual Responses To Music , 1942 .

[41]  Ophelia Deroy,et al.  Tasting Liquid Shapes: Investigating the Sensory Basis of Cross-modal Correspondences , 2011 .

[42]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  Charles Spence,et al.  Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa content , 2011 .

[44]  B. Lyman.  Representation of Complex Emotional and Abstract Meanings by Simple Forms , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[45]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds , 2014 .

[46]  H. Moskowitz.  The sweetness and pleasantness of sugars. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[47]  Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al.  Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations , 2011 .

[48]  Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: Visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[49]  C. Spence,et al.  Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape , 2015 .