Exploring how optimal composite design is influenced by model fidelity and multiple objectives

Abstract This paper explores how optimal configuration of a composite panel is influenced by the choice of analysis model – analytic or computational – and the consideration of multiple objectives. While past research has explored aspects of this problem separately – composite ply orientation, multiple load scenarios, and multiple performance objectives – there has been limited work addressing the interactions between these factors. Three loading scenarios are considered in this work, and it is demonstrated that for certain scenarios an analytical model likely over-predicts composite performance. Further, for complex loading scenarios it is impossible to develop an analytical model. However, this work also demonstrates that the use of analytical models can be advantageous. Analytical models can provide similar estimates to computational models for some loading cases at significantly reduced computational expense. More importantly, it is also shown how solutions from the analytical model, which can be relatively cheap to find computationally, can be used to seed the initial designs of a Finite Element-based optimization. Run time reductions as large as 80% are demonstrated when these informed seeded designs are used, even when the designs were created for a different set of loading scenarios.

[1]  Evandro Parente,et al.  A hybrid shared/distributed memory parallel genetic algorithm for optimization of laminate composites , 2014 .

[2]  Christos Kassapoglou,et al.  Generating realistic laminate fiber angle distributions for optimal variable stiffness laminates , 2012 .

[3]  Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou,et al.  A multi-objective metamodel-assisted memetic algorithm with strength-based local refinement , 2009 .

[4]  Dawn C. Jegley,et al.  Optimization of Elastically Tailored Tow-Placed Plates with Holes , 2003 .

[5]  G. Soremekun.  Genetic Algorithms for Composite Laminate Design and Optimization , 1997 .

[6]  Mark Walker,et al.  Application of MATHEMATICA to the optimal design of composite shells for improved buckling strength , 1998 .

[7]  Mark Walker,et al.  Multiobjective design of laminated cylindrical shells for maximum torsional and axial buckling loads , 1997 .

[8]  Armando Miguel Awruch,et al.  Design optimization of composite laminated structures using genetic algorithms and finite element analysis , 2009 .

[9]  Azam Tafreshi,et al.  Buckling and post-buckling analysis of composite cylindrical shells with cutouts subjected to internal pressure and axial compression loads , 2002 .

[10]  Erik Lund,et al.  Failure optimization of geometrically linear/nonlinear laminated composite structures using a two-step hierarchical model adaptivity , 2009 .

[11]  George Z. Voyiadjis,et al.  Mechanics of Composite Materials with MATLAB , 2005 .

[12]  J. Whitney.  Structural Analysis of Laminated Anisotropic Plates , 1987 .

[13]  Gabriel Bugeda,et al.  Multilayered composite structure design optimisation using distributed/parallel multi-objective evolutionary algorithms , 2012 .

[14]  Umut Topal,et al.  Multiobjective optimum design of laminated composite annular sector plates , 2013 .

[15]  F.-X. Irisarri,et al.  Computational strategy for multiobjective optimization of composite stiffened panels , 2011 .

[16]  DebK.,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[17]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Optimum stacking sequence design of composite materials Part I: Constant stiffness design , 2009 .

[18]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Designing composite structures: Lay-up selection , 2002 .

[19]  Zafer Gürdal,et al.  Optimal Design of Tow-Placed Fuselage Panels for Maximum Strength with Buckling Considerations , 2010 .

[20]  Joseph Lynn Henderson,et al.  Laminated plate design using genetic algorithms and parallel processing , 1994 .

[21]  W. J. Park,et al.  An Optimal Design of Simple Symmetric Laminates Under the First Ply Failure Criterion , 1982 .

[22]  Angela Vincenti,et al.  Structural rigidity optimization of thin laminated shells , 2013 .

[23]  Tarun Kant,et al.  Analytical solutions for free vibration of laminated composite and sandwich plates based on a higher-order refined theory , 2001 .

[24]  David Bassir,et al.  Multiobjective stacking sequence optimization for laminated composite structures , 2009 .

[25]  Helder C. Rodrigues,et al.  Hierarchical optimization of laminated fiber reinforced composites , 2014 .

[26]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Optimisation of blended bistable laminates for a morphing flap , 2012 .

[27]  M. Walker,et al.  A technique for the multiobjective optimisation of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithms and finite element analysis , 2003 .

[28]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[29]  Mark Walker,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of laminated plates for maximum prebuckling, buckling and postbuckling strength using continuous and discrete ply angles , 1996 .

[30]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Layer Separation for Optimization of Composite Laminates , 2008, DAC 2008.

[31]  W. Lansing,et al.  Application of Fully Stressed Design Procedures to Wing and Empennage Structures , 1971 .

[32]  Scott Ferguson,et al.  Creating targeted initial populations for genetic product searches in heterogeneous markets , 2014 .

[33]  Petri Kere,et al.  Design optimization of laminated composite structures using distributed grid resources , 2005 .

[34]  Y. Hirano.  Optimum Design of Laminated Plates under Axial Compression , 1979 .

[35]  Michael W. Hyer,et al.  Use of Material Tailoring to Improve Buckling Capacity of Elliptical Composite Cylinders , 2007 .

[36]  Harold Crate,et al.  Buckling of thin-walled cylinder under axial compression and internal pressure , 1951 .

[37]  Mark W. Hilburger,et al.  Response of composite shells with cutouts to internal pressure and compression loads , 1999 .