Automatic tissue segmentation of breast biopsies imaged by QPI

The current tissue evaluation method for breast cancer would greatly benefit from higher throughput and less inter-observer variation. Since quantitative phase imaging (QPI) measures physical parameters of tissue, it can be used to find quantitative markers, eliminating observer subjectivity. Furthermore, since the pixel values in QPI remain the same regardless of the instrument used, classifiers can be built to segment various tissue components without need for color calibration. In this work we use a texton-based approach to segment QPI images of breast tissue into various tissue components (epithelium, stroma or lumen). A tissue microarray comprising of 900 unstained cores from 400 different patients was imaged using Spatial Light Interference Microscopy. The training data were generated by manually segmenting the images for 36 cores and labelling each pixel (epithelium, stroma or lumen.). For each pixel in the data, a response vector was generated by the Leung-Malik (LM) filter bank and these responses were clustered using the k-means algorithm to find the centers (called textons). A random forest classifier was then trained to find the relationship between a pixel’s label and the histogram of these textons in that pixel’s neighborhood. The segmentation was carried out on the validation set by calculating the texton histogram in a pixel’s neighborhood and generating a label based on the model learnt during training. Segmentation of the tissue into various components is an important step toward efficiently computing parameters that are markers of disease. Automated segmentation, followed by diagnosis, can improve the accuracy and speed of analysis leading to better health outcomes.

[1]  J. Rogers,et al.  Spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM) , 2010, IEEE Photonic Society 24th Annual Meeting.

[2]  Myung K. Kim Digital Holographic Microscopy: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2011 .

[3]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Prostate cancer diagnosis using quantitative phase imaging and machine learning algorithms , 2015, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[4]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  A Statistical Approach to Texture Classification from Single Images , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  Chun-Min Lo,et al.  High-resolution quantitative phase-contrast microscopy by digital holography. , 2005, Optics express.

[6]  Zhuo Wang,et al.  Tissue refractive index as marker of disease. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  Shikhar Uttam,et al.  Early Prediction of Cancer Progression by Depth-Resolved Nanoscale Mapping of Nuclear Architecture from Unstained Tissue Specimens. , 2015, Cancer research.

[8]  Zhuo Wang,et al.  Scattering-phase theorem. , 2011, Optics letters.

[9]  Christine Desmedt,et al.  Infrared imaging in breast cancer: automated tissue component recognition and spectral characterization of breast cancer cells as well as the tumor microenvironment. , 2014, The Analyst.

[10]  G. Popescu Quantitative Phase Imaging of Cells and Tissues , 2011 .

[11]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis using spatial light interference microscopy , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[12]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Prediction of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using Quantitative Phase Imaging , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Zahid Yaqoob,et al.  Harmonically matched grating-based full-field quantitative high-resolution phase microscope for observing dynamics of transparent biological samples. , 2007, Optics express.

[14]  Preclinical S Tudy Nuclear nano-morphology markers of histologically normal cells detect the ''field effect'' of breast cancer , 2012 .

[15]  Shu Ichihara,et al.  Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[16]  Shikhar Uttam,et al.  Nanoscale nuclear architecture for cancer diagnosis beyond pathology via spatial-domain low-coherence quantitative phase microscopy. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[17]  Rohit Bhargava,et al.  Spatial-domain low-coherence quantitative phase microscopy for cancer diagnosis. , 2010, Optics letters.