Quantitative ultrasound of the hand phalanges in a cohort of monozygotic twins: influence of genetic and environmental factors

ObjectiveOur objective was to evaluate the similarities and differences in bone mass and structure between pairs of monozygotic twins as measured by means of the quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technique.DesignA cohort of monozygotic twins was measured by QUS of the hand phalanges using the DBM sonic bone profiler (IGEA, Carpi, Italy). The parameters studied were amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS), ultrasound bone profile index (UBPI), signal dynamics (SDy) and bone transmission time (BTT). Linear correlation coefficients, multivariate linear analysis and the ANOVA test were used to assess intrapair associations between variables and to determine which factors influence the intrapair differences in QUS variables.PatientsOne hundred and six pairs of monozygotic twins were enrolled in the study, 68 females and 38 males in the age range 5 to 71 years.ResultsSignificant intrapair correlations were obtained in the whole population and separately for males and females, regarding height ( r =0.98–0.99, p <0.0001), weight ( r =0.95–0.96, p <0.0001), AD-SoS ( r =0.90–0.92, p <0.0001), BTT ( r =0.94–0.95, p <0.0001) and other QUS parameters ( r >0.74, p <0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that intrapair differences between AD-SoS, SDy, UBPI and BTT are significantly influenced by age in the whole population and in the female population. Furthermore, the ANOVA test showed, for the female group, a significant increase in the intrapair differences in SDy and UBPI above 40 years.ConclusionsA relative contribution of genetic factors to skeletal status could be observed by phalangeal QUS measurement in monozygotic twins. A significant increase in the intrapair difference in QUS parameters with increasing age and onset of menopause also suggests the importance of environmental factors in the female twin population.

[1]  D. Lorenz,et al.  The use of different multiplex PCRs for twin zygosity determination and its application in forensic trace analysis. , 2004, Legal medicine.

[2]  M. Bicocchi,et al.  Three-year longitudinal study with quantitative ultrasound at the hand phalanx in a female population , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[4]  I. Chiodini,et al.  Phalangeal US velocity discriminates between normal and vertebrally fractured subjects , 1999, European Radiology.

[5]  J. Eisman,et al.  Genetic and Environmental Contributions to the Association Between Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Mineral Density Measurements: A Twin Study , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  T. Andrew,et al.  Linkage and Association for Bone Mineral Density and Heel Ultrasound Measurements with a Simple Tandem Repeat Polymorphism near the Osteocalcin Gene in Female Dizygotic Twins , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  C. Krestan,et al.  Quantitative US of the calcaneus: cutoff levels for the distinction of healthy and osteoporotic individuals. , 2001, Radiology.

[8]  G. Guglielmi,et al.  Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. , 1994, Radiology.

[9]  S. Gonnelli,et al.  Usefulness of bone quantitative ultrasound in management of osteoporosis in men. , 2001, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[10]  C. Slemenda,et al.  Long-Term Bone Loss in Men: Effects of Genetic and Environmental Factors , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  F. Paltrinieri,et al.  Ultrasound velocity changes at the proximal phalanxes of the hand in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  S. Ralston,et al.  The genetics of osteoporosis. , 1999, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[13]  D. Hans,et al.  Discriminatory Ability of Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters and Bone Mineral Density in a Population‐Based Sample of Postmenopausal Women With Vertebral Fractures: Results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  L. Avioli,et al.  Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. , 1990, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[15]  S. Grant,et al.  Genetic Control of Bone Density and Turnover: Role of the Collagen 1α1, Estrogen Receptor, and Vitamin D Receptor Genes , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Genetic aspects of osteoporosis. , 1999, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[17]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Environmental and genetic factors affecting bone mass. Similarity of bone density among members of healthy families. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  R. Cadossi,et al.  Influence of Bone Tissue Density and Elasticity on Ultrasound Propagation: An In Vitro Study , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  B. Stampa,et al.  Assessment of the Geometry of Human Finger Phalanges Using Quantitative Ultrasound In Vivo , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Genetic factors and osteoporotic fractures in elderly people: prospective 25 year follow up of a nationwide cohort of elderly Finnish twins , 1999, BMJ.

[21]  T. Spector,et al.  Genetic Variation in Bone Mineral Density and Calcaneal Ultrasound: A Study of the Influence of Menopause Using Female Twins , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Comparison of radiographic absorptiometry with dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in normal older white and black women , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  B. Drozdzowska,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound at the hand phalanges in monozygotic twins: a preliminary report. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  H. Genant,et al.  Palangeal Quantitative Ultrasound, Phalangeal Morphometric Variables, and Vertebral Fracture Discrimination , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[25]  S. Gonnelli,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound at the Phalanges in Healthy Italian Men , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  J. Reginster,et al.  Phalangeal Osteosonogrammetry Study: Age‐Related Changes, Diagnostic Sensitivity, and Discrimination Power , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.