Escape from adaptive conflict after duplication in an anthocyanin pathway gene

Gene duplications have been recognized as an important source of evolutionary innovation and adaptation since at least Haldane, and their varying fates may partly explain the vast disparity in observed genome sizes. The expected fates of most gene duplications involve primarily non-adaptive substitutions leading to either non-functionalization of one duplicate copy or subfunctionalization, neither of which yields novel function. A significant evolutionary problem is thus elucidating the mechanisms of adaptive evolutionary change leading to evolutionary novelty. Currently, the most widely recognized adaptive process involving gene duplication is neo-functionalization (NEO-F), in which one copy undergoes directional selection to perform a novel function after duplication. An alternative, but understudied, adaptive fate that has been proposed is escape from adaptive conflict (EAC), in which a single-copy gene is selected to perform a novel function while maintaining its ancestral function. This gene is constrained from improving either novel or ancestral function because of detrimental pleiotropic effects on the other function. After duplication, one copy is free to improve novel function, whereas the other is selected to improve ancestral function. Here we first present two criteria that can be used to distinguish NEO-F from EAC. Using both tests for positive selection and assays of enzyme function, we then demonstrate that adaptive evolutionary change in a duplicated gene of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in morning glories (Ipomoea) is best interpreted as EAC. Finally, we argue that this phenomenon likely occurs more often than has been previously believed and may thus represent an important mechanism in generating evolutionary novelty.

[1]  M. DePristo,et al.  Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  R. Olmstead,et al.  Monophyly of the Convolvulaceae and circumscription of their major lineages based on DNA sequences of multiple chloroplast loci. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[3]  W. Wong,et al.  Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  S. Martens,et al.  Biochemical formation of anthocyanins in silk tissue of Zea mays , 2003 .

[5]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[6]  A. Force,et al.  The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. , 2000, Genetics.

[7]  Thomas Mitchell-Olds,et al.  Positive selection driving diversification in plant secondary metabolism. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Force,et al.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. , 1999, Genetics.

[9]  Tsukasa Iwashina,et al.  The Structure and Distribution of the Flavonoids in Plants , 2000, Journal of Plant Research.

[10]  H. A. Stafford.  Flavonoids and related phenolic compounds produced in the first internode of Sorghum vulgare Pers. in darkness and in light. , 1965, Plant physiology.

[11]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  R. Nicholson,et al.  Phytoalexin synthesis by the sorghum mesocotyl in response to infection by pathogenic and nonpathogenic fungi. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Dr. Susumu Ohno.  Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[14]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[15]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[16]  B. Gallois,et al.  Crystal structure of grape dihydroflavonol 4-reductase, a key enzyme in flavonoid biosynthesis. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch , 2007, Nature.

[18]  B C Meyers,et al.  Clusters of resistance genes in plants evolve by divergent selection and a birth-and-death process. , 1998, Genome research.

[19]  H. Cheong,et al.  Alteration of a single amino acid changes the substrate specificity of dihydroflavonol 4-reductase. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[20]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Adaptive evolution of a duplicated pancreatic ribonuclease gene in a leaf-eating monkey , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[21]  A. Hughes.  The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  A. Force,et al.  The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate. , 2001, Genetics.

[23]  H. A. Stafford,et al.  Enzymic and nonenzymic reduction of (+)-dihydroquercetin to its 3,4,-diol. , 1982, Plant physiology.

[24]  D. Labie,et al.  Molecular Evolution , 1991, Nature.

[25]  T. Fischer,et al.  Molecular cloning, substrate specificity of the functionally expressed dihydroflavonol 4-reductases from Malus domestica and Pyrus communis cultivars and the consequences for flavonoid metabolism. , 2003, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[26]  J. Piatigorsky,et al.  The recruitment of crystallins: new functions precede gene duplication , 1991, Science.

[27]  H. Saedler,et al.  Influence of transposable elements on the structure and function of the A1 gene of Zea mays , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[28]  J. Haldane,et al.  The Part Played by Recurrent Mutation in Evolution , 1933, The American Naturalist.

[29]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  Estimating the tempo and mode of gene family evolution from comparative genomic data. , 2005, Genome research.

[30]  S. Iida,et al.  Genomic organization of the genes encoding dihydroflavonol 4-reductase for flower pigmentation in the Japanese and common morning glories. , 1999, Gene.