Quantum Structure in Cognition and the Foundations of Human Reasoning

Traditional cognitive science rests on a foundation of classical logic and probability theory. This foundation has been seriously challenged by several findings in experimental psychology on human decision making. Meanwhile, the formalism of quantum theory has provided an efficient resource for modeling these classically problematical situations. In this paper, we start from our successful quantum-theoretic approach to the modeling of concept combinations to formulate a unifying explanatory hypothesis. In it, human reasoning is the superposition of two processes – a conceptual reasoning, whose nature is emergence of new conceptuality, and a logical reasoning, founded on an algebraic calculus of the logical type. In most cognitive processes however, the former reasoning prevails over the latter. In this perspective, the observed deviations from classical logical reasoning should not be interpreted as biases but, rather, as natural expressions of emergence in its deepest form.

[1]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Concepts and Their Dynamics: A Quantum-Theoretic Modeling of Human Thought , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Quantum Structure Description of the Liar Paradox , 1999 .

[3]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structure of negation and conjunction in human thought , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Sandro Sozzo,et al.  Conjunction and Negation of Natural Concepts: A Quantum-theoretic Modeling , 2014, ArXiv.

[5]  N. Foo Conceptual Spaces—The Geometry of Thought , 2022 .

[6]  L. A. Zedeh Knowledge representation in fuzzy logic , 1989 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[8]  J. Hampton Overextension of Conjunctive Concepts: Evidence for a Unitary Model of Concept Typicality and Class Inclusion , 1988 .

[9]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[10]  Sandro Sozzo,et al.  A Quantum Probability Explanation in Fock Space for Borderline Contradictions , 2013, 1311.6050.

[11]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A theory of concepts and their combinations I: The structure of the sets of contexts and properties , 2005 .

[12]  H. Kamp,et al.  Prototype theory and compositionality , 1995, Cognition.

[13]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Quantum Nature of Identity in Human Thought: Bose-Einstein Statistics for Conceptual Indistinguishability , 2014, ArXiv.

[14]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Knowledge Representation in Fuzzy Logic , 1996, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[15]  J. Hampton,et al.  Conceptual combination: Conjunction and negation of natural concepts , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts , 1981, Cognition.

[17]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Theory of Concepts and Their Combinations II: A Hilbert Space Representation , 2004 .

[18]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[20]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Typicality, Graded Membership, and Vagueness , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  J. Fodor,et al.  Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong , 1998 .

[22]  Christin Wirth,et al.  Concepts Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong , 2016 .

[23]  J. Hampton,et al.  Disjunction of natural concepts , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Mark J. Machina,et al.  Risk, Ambiguity, and the Rank-Dependence Axioms , 2009 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty , 1992 .

[26]  Sam Alxatib,et al.  On the Psychology of Truth-Gaps , 2009, ViC.

[27]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition , 2008, 0805.3850.

[28]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  The Current Status of Research on Concept Combination , 1995 .

[29]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition: Why and How Concepts Are Entangled , 2011, QI.