How well do integrated assessment models simulate climate change?

Integrated assessment models (IAMs) are regularly used to evaluate different policies of future emissions reductions. Since the global costs associated with these policies are immense, it is vital that the uncertainties in IAMs are quantified and understood. We first demonstrate the significant spread in the climate system and carbon cycle components of several contemporary IAMs. We then examine these components in more detail to understand the causes of differences, comparing the results with more complex climate models and earth system models (ESMs), where available. Our results show that in most cases the outcomes of IAMs are within the range of the outcomes of complex models, but differences are large enough to matter for policy advice. There are areas where IAMs would benefit from improvements (e.g. climate sensitivity, inertia in climate response, carbon cycle feedbacks). In some cases, additional climate model experiments are needed to be able to tune some of these improvements. This will require better communication between the IAM and ESM development communities.

[1]  D. Randall,et al.  Climate models and their evaluation , 2007 .

[2]  R. Voss,et al.  Climate Dynamics �2001) 18: 189±202 Ó Springer-Verlag 2001 , 2000 .

[3]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Peaking profiles for achieving long-term temperature targets with more likelihood at lower costs , 2007 .

[4]  W. Nordhaus A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies , 2008 .

[5]  J. Kasting,et al.  Optimal reductions in CO2 emissions. , 1997, Energy policy.

[6]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value‐laden assumptions? , 1997 .

[7]  Wolf Häfele,et al.  Energy in a finite world , 1981 .

[8]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Overview of EMF-21: Multigas Mitigation and Climate Policy , 2006 .

[9]  Bryan K. Mignone,et al.  Atmospheric stabilization and the timing of carbon mitigation , 2008 .

[10]  Graham D. Riley,et al.  Development and illustrative outputs of the Community Integrated Assessment System (CIAS), a multi-institutional modular integrated assessment approach for modelling climate change , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[12]  T. Wigley,et al.  Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming , 2001, Science.

[13]  W. Collins,et al.  Global climate projections , 2007 .

[14]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[15]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Multi-Gas Emission Reduction for Climate Change Policy: An Application of Fund , 2006 .

[16]  J. Edmonds,et al.  The economic implications of carbon cycle uncertainty , 2006 .

[17]  J. M. Reilly,et al.  Temperature increase of 21st century mitigation scenarios , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) Version 2: Model Description and Baseline Evaluation , 2005 .

[19]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[20]  Hans-Martin Füssel,et al.  Methodological and empirical flaws in the design and application of simple climate-economy models , 2007 .

[21]  L. K. Gohar,et al.  How difficult is it to recover from dangerous levels of global warming? , 2009 .

[22]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  The efficient use of energy resources , 1979 .

[23]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[24]  Graham D. Riley,et al.  Erratum to "Development and illustrative outputs of the Community Integrated Assessment System (CIAS), a multi-institutional modular integrated assessment approach for modelling climate change" [Environ Model Softw 23(5) (2008) 592-610] , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change : the IPCC scientific assessment , 1990 .

[26]  Julia C. Hargreaves,et al.  Long-term climate commitments projected with climate-carbon cycle models , 2008 .

[27]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Methods for integrated assessment , 2001 .

[28]  J. Dufresne,et al.  On the magnitude of positive feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle , 2002 .

[29]  D. Schimel Climate change: The carbon equation , 1998, Nature.

[30]  D. Dokken,et al.  Climate change 2001 , 2001 .

[31]  New Study For Climate Modeling, Analyses, and Scenarios , 2009 .

[32]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization , 2007 .

[33]  Jean-Pascal van Ypersele de Strihou,et al.  Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies , 2008 .

[34]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[35]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Emission Scenarios , 2001 .

[36]  J. Dufresne,et al.  Positive feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle , 2001 .

[37]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[38]  Irving M. Mintzer,et al.  A matter of degrees : the potential for controlling the greenhouse effect , 1987 .

[39]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  An integrated model for the assessment of the greenhouse effect: The Dutch approach , 1990 .

[40]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  Merge: An Integrated Assessment Model for Global Climate Change , 2005 .

[41]  F. Joos,et al.  Correcting the carbon cycle representation: How important is it for the economics of climate change? , 1999 .

[42]  Zong-ci Zhao,et al.  Climate change 2001, the scientific basis, chap. 8: model evaluation. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC , 2001 .

[43]  Chris Hope,et al.  The marginal impact of CO2 from PAGE2002: An integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC's five reasons for concern , 2006 .

[44]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 and climate: Importance of the transient response , 1981 .

[45]  Michael Toman,et al.  Climate Change Policy , 2000 .

[46]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Modeling greenhouse gas energy technology responses to climate change , 2004 .

[47]  Roger Revelle,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Exchange Between Atmosphere and Ocean and the Question of an Increase of Atmospheric CO2 during the Past Decades , 1957 .

[48]  Contributions of carbon cycle uncertainty to future climate projection spread , 2009 .

[49]  Tom Kram,et al.  Intergrated modelling of global environmenthal change : An overview of IMAGE 2.4 , 2006 .

[50]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs , 2007 .

[51]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Erratum to "Development and illustrative outputs of the Community Integrated Assessment System (CIAS), a multi-institutional modular integrated assessment approach for modelling climate change" Environ Model Softw 23(5) (2008) 592-610 (DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.09.002) , 2008 .

[52]  J. Bruce,et al.  Climate change, 1995 : economic and social dimensions of climate change , 1997 .

[53]  R. T. Watson,et al.  Greenhouse gases and aerosols , 1990 .

[54]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  A steep road to climate stabilization , 2008, Nature.

[55]  Myles R. Allen,et al.  Constraining climate forecasts: The role of prior assumptions , 2005 .

[56]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Stabilizing climate requires near‐zero emissions , 2008 .

[57]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[58]  Clare M. Goodess,et al.  Representing Climate and Extreme Weather Events in Integrated Assessment Models: A Review of Existing Methods and Options for Development , 2003 .

[59]  K. Shine Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2000 .

[60]  K. Matsumoto,et al.  Climate and carbon cycle changes under the overshoot scenario , 2008 .

[61]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Analysing the costs and benefits of climate policy: Value judgements and scientific uncertainties , 2008 .

[62]  S. Solomon,et al.  Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Balancing the carbon budget. Implications for projections of future carbon dioxide concentration changes , 1993 .

[64]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Emulating IPCC AR4 atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models for projecting global-mean, hemispheric and land/ocean temperatures: MAGICC 6.0 , 2008 .

[65]  K. Hasselmann,et al.  Transport and storage of CO2 in the ocean ——an inorganic ocean-circulation carbon cycle model , 1987 .

[66]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing , 2006 .

[67]  C. Huntingford,et al.  "Overshoot" Scenarios and Climate Change , 2007, Science.