A bird's-eye view of scientific trading: Dependency relations among fields of science

We use a trading metaphor to study knowledge transfer in the sciences as well as the social sciences. The metaphor comprises four dimensions: (a) Discipline Self-dependence, (b) Knowledge Exports/Imports, (c) Scientific Trading Dynamics, and (d) Scientific Trading Impact. This framework is applied to a dataset of 221 Web of Science subject categories. We find that: (i) the Scientific Trading Impact and Dynamics of materials science and transportation science have increased; (ii) biomedical disciplines, physics, and mathematics are significant knowledge exporters, as is statistics and probability; (iii) in the social sciences, economics, business, psychology, management, and sociology are important knowledge exporters; and (iv) Discipline Self-dependence is associated with specialized domains which have ties to professional practice (e.g., law, ophthalmology, dentistry, oral surgery and medicine, psychology, psychoanalysis, veterinary sciences, and nursing).

[1]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Mapping the backbone of science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[2]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects , 2009 .

[3]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The Convergence of Information Science and Communication: A Bibliometric Analysis , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  A. Porter,et al.  Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture , 2006 .

[6]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  “Structuration” by intellectual organization: the configuration of knowledge in relations among structural components in networks of science , 2010, Scientometrics.

[7]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[8]  S. Bradford.  "Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford , 1985 .

[9]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Profiling the professors , 1989, J. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.

[11]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories , 2004, Scientometrics.

[13]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[15]  Anthony F. J. van Raan.  Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system , 2008 .

[16]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  S. Redner.  How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution , 1998, cond-mat/9804163.

[18]  Peter Willett,et al.  Quantifying the value of knowledge exports from librarianship and information science research , 2013, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Stephen J. Bensman.  Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: An analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science , 2002, Scientometrics.

[21]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[23]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Knowledge Flows, Patent Citations and the Impact of Science on Technology , 2008 .

[24]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Import and Export of Cognitive Science , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Institutional interactions: Exploring social, cognitive, and geographic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication , 1984 .

[27]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[28]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows , 2000 .

[29]  Sheldon Green,et al.  The discipline dependence of citation statistics , 2010, Scientometrics.

[30]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Searching for converging research using field to field citations , 2010, Scientometrics.

[31]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Identification of converging research areas using publication and citation data , 2010 .

[32]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The delineation of an interdisciplinary specialty in terms of a journal set: The case of communication studies , 2009 .

[33]  Rocío Gómez Crisóstomo,et al.  Import-export of knowledge between scientific subject categories: The iceberg hypothesis , 2007, Scientometrics.

[34]  S. Stigler.  Citation Patterns in the Journals of Statistics and Probability , 1994 .

[35]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[36]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[37]  Charles E. Osgood,et al.  Bibliographical citation characteristics of the psychological journal network in 1950 and in 1960. , 1967 .

[38]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  The Balance of Trade Between Disciplines , 2005 .

[39]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[40]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[41]  T. Lenoir.  Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines , 1997 .

[42]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories , 2012, Scientometrics.

[43]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Facing Diversity of Science: A Challenge for Bibliometric Indicators , 2005 .

[44]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[45]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[46]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[47]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Journal impact measures in bibliometric research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[48]  Michael Batty,et al.  The geography of scientific productivity: scaling in US computer science , 2006 .

[49]  Nadine Massard,et al.  Spatial knowledge diffusion through collaborative networks , 2007 .

[50]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[51]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[52]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[53]  Steven Wooding,et al.  Tracking knowledge diffusion through citations , 2005 .

[54]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Subject clustering analysis based on ISI category classification , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[55]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Algorithmic citation-linked historiography - Mapping the literature of science , 2005, ASIST.

[56]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities , 1996 .

[57]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The export of ideas from information science , 1990, J. Inf. Sci..

[58]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes , 2004, Scientometrics.

[59]  A. Porter,et al.  How interdisciplinary is a given body of research , 2008 .

[60]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Identifying the Age Profile of Patent Citations , 2006 .

[61]  P. Wouters.  The citation culture , 1999 .