Protocol of the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials (DATECAN) project: formal consensus method for the development of guidelines for standardised time-to-event endpoints' definitions in cancer clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION In randomised phase III cancer clinical trials, the most objectively defined and only validated time-to-event endpoint is overall survival (OS). The appearance of new types of treatments and the multiplication of lines of treatment have resulted in the use of surrogate endpoints for overall survival such as progression-free survival (PFS), or time-to-treatment failure. Their development is strongly influenced by the necessity of reducing clinical trial duration, cost and number of patients. However, while these endpoints are frequently used, they are often poorly defined and definitions can differ between trials which may limit their use as primary endpoints. Moreover, this variability of definitions can impact on the trial's results by affecting estimation of treatments' effects. The aim of the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials (DATECAN) project is to provide recommendations for standardised definitions of time-to-event endpoints in randomised cancer clinical trials. METHODS We will use a formal consensus methodology based on experts' opinions which will be obtained in a systematic manner. RESULTS Definitions will be independently developed for several cancer sites, including pancreatic, breast, head and neck and colon cancer, as well as sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). DISCUSSION The DATECAN project should lead to the elaboration of recommendations that can then be used as guidelines by researchers participating in clinical trials. This process should lead to a standardisation of the definitions of commonly used time-to-event endpoints, enabling appropriate comparisons of future trials' results.

[1]  D. Hunter,et al.  Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research , 1995 .

[2]  B. Daniele,et al.  Design and Endpoints of Clinical Trials in Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2008 .

[3]  International conference on harmonisation; guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials; availability--FDA. Notice. , 1998, Federal register.

[4]  Bengt Glimelius,et al.  Survival endpoints in colorectal cancer and the effect of second primary other cancer on disease free survival , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[5]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Richard Pazdur,et al.  Endpoints for assessing drug activity in clinical trials. , 2008, The oncologist.

[7]  B. Burnand,et al.  The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual , 2001 .

[8]  H. A. Lingstone,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[9]  Richard Pazdur,et al.  End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  H. Putter,et al.  The in- or exclusion of non-breast cancer related death and contralateral breast cancer significantly affects estimated outcome probability in early breast cancer , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[12]  R. Guy,et al.  International Conference on Harmonisation , 2014 .

[13]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  Sally Hunsberger,et al.  Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  R. Labianca,et al.  Endpoints in adjuvant treatment trials: a systematic review of the literature in colon cancer and proposed definitions for future trials. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Alternative end points to evaluate a therapeutic strategy in advanced colorectal cancer: evaluation of progression-free survival, duration of disease control, and time to failure of strategy--an Aide et Recherche en Cancerologie Digestive Group Study. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  S. Mathoulin-Pélissier,et al.  Survival end point reporting in randomized cancer clinical trials: a review of major journals. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Riccardo Lencioni,et al.  Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[20]  R. Greil,et al.  Randomized phase III trial comparing biweekly infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin alone or with irinotecan in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer: PETACC-3. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  S. Michiels,et al.  Reporting of time-to-event end points and tracking of failures in randomized trials of radiotherapy with or without any concomitant anticancer agent for locally advanced head and neck cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Susan Halabi,et al.  Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.