Making Organizational Learning Operational: Implications from Learning Classifier Systems

The concepts of organizational learning in organization and management science cover a very wide range of organization-related activities in organization. Since socially situated intelligence is one of such activities, this paper makes the concept of organizational learning operational from the computational viewpoint for investigating socially situated intelligence. In particular, this paper focuses on the characteristics of multiagent learning as one kind of socially situated intelligence, and analyzes them using four operationalized learning mechanisms in organizational learning. A careful investigation on the characteristics of multiagent learning has revealed the following implications: (1) there are two levels in the learning mechanisms for multiagent learning (the individual level and organizational level) and each mechanism is divided into two types (single- and double-loop learning). The integration of these four learning mechanisms improves socially situated intelligence; and (2) the following properties support socially situated intelligence: (a) different dimensions in learning mechanisms, (b) interaction among various levels and types of learning mechanisms in addition to interaction among agents, and (c) combination of exploration at an individual level and exploitation at an organizational level.

[1]  Daniel H. Kim The Link between individual and organizational learning , 1997 .

[2]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[3]  Gerhard Weiß Distributed Artificial Intelligence Meets Machine Learning Learning in Multi-Agent Environments , 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  Stefan Kirn,et al.  Cooperative Knowledge Processing , 1997, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[5]  John H. Holland,et al.  COGNITIVE SYSTEMS BASED ON ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS1 , 1978 .

[6]  Raul Espejo,et al.  Organizational Transformation and Learning: A Cybernetic Approach to Management , 1996 .

[7]  Greg O’Hare,et al.  Cooperative Knowledge Processing: The Key Technology for Intelligent Organizations , 1996 .

[8]  S. Rosenschein,et al.  Computational Theories of Interaction and Agency , 1996 .

[9]  C. Barnard The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[10]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing artificial societies , 1996 .

[11]  Stephen F. Smith,et al.  Flexible Learning of Problem Solving Heuristics Through Adaptive Search , 1983, IJCAI.

[12]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Adaption and Learning in Multi-Agent Systems , 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[14]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[15]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[16]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Introduction to Reinforcement Learning , 1998 .

[17]  R. Duncan Organizational Learning : Implications for organizational design , 1979 .

[18]  Gerhard Weiß,et al.  Adaptation and Learning in Multi-Agent Systems: Some Remarks and a Bibliography , 1995, Adaption and Learning in Multi-Agent Systems.

[19]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[20]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[21]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.