Effects of Body Cross-sectional Shape on Flying Snake Aerodynamics

Despite their lack of appendages, flying snakes (genus Chrysopelea) exhibit aerodynamic performance that compares favorably to other animal gliders. We wished to determine which aspects of Chrysopelea’s unique shape contributed to its aerodynamic performance by testing physical models of Chrysopelea in a wind tunnel. We varied the relative body volume, edge sharpness, and backbone protrusion of the models. Chrysopelea’s gliding performance was surprisingly robust to most shape changes; the presence of a trailing-edge lip was the most significant factor in producing high lift forces. Lift to drag ratios of 2.7–2.9 were seen at angles of attack (α) from 10–30°. Stall did not occur until α > 30° and was gradual, with lift falling off slowly as drag increased. Chrysopelea actively undulates in an S-shape when gliding, such that posterior portions of the snake’s body lie in the wake of the more anterior portions. When two Chrysopelea body segment models were tested in tandem to produce a two dimensional approximation to this situation, the downstream model exhibited an increased lift-to-drag ratio (as much as 50% increase over a solitary model) at all horizontal gaps tested (3–7 chords) when located slightly below the upstream model and at all vertical staggers tested (±2 chords) at a gap of 7 chords.

[1]  R. Dudley,et al.  Directed aerial descent in canopy ants , 2005, Nature.

[2]  Satoshi Shiraishi,et al.  Gliding Flight in the Japanese Giant Flying Squirrel Petaurista leucogenys , 1993 .

[3]  J. Socha Kinematics: Gliding flight in the paradise tree snake , 2002, Nature.

[4]  Karl Vernes,et al.  GLIDING PERFORMANCE OF THE NORTHERN FLYING SQUIRREL (GLAUCOMYS SABRINUS) IN MATURE MIXED FOREST OF EASTERN CANADA , 2001 .

[5]  S. Hoerner Fluid-Dynamic Lift , 1985 .

[6]  J Muelle,et al.  AERODYNAMICS OF SMALL VEHICLES , 2004 .

[7]  M. Z. Abdullah,et al.  Two-Dimensional Analysis of Tandem/Staggered Airfoils Using Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2005 .

[8]  M. Labarbera,et al.  Effects of size and behavior on aerial performance of two species of flying snakes (Chrysopelea) , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Aerodynamic Characteristics of Low Aspect Ratio Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2001 .

[10]  Stephen M. Jackson,et al.  Glide angle in the genus Petaurus and a review of gliding in mammals , 2000 .

[11]  B. R. Moon Testing an inference of function from structure: Snake vertebrae do the twist , 1999, Journal of morphology.

[12]  Andrew J Spence,et al.  Take-off and landing kinetics of a free-ranging gliding mammal, the Malayan colugo (Galeopterus variegatus) , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Kristin L Bishop The relationship between 3-D kinematics and gliding performance in the southern flying squirrel, Glaucomys volans , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  M. Labarbera,et al.  A 3-D kinematic analysis of gliding in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Experimental Study of a Low Reynolds Number Tandem Airfoil Configuration , 1992 .

[16]  T. Kawamichi,et al.  GLIDING BEHAVIOR OF JAPANESE GIANT FLYING SQUIRRELS (PETAURISTA LEUCOGENYS) , 2002 .

[17]  R. Dudley,et al.  The Cost of Living Large: Comparative Gliding Performance in Flying Lizards (Agamidae: Draco) , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[18]  G. R. Spedding,et al.  The implications of low-speed fixed-wing aerofoil measurements on the analysis and performance of flapping bird wings , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .