Evaluation of salt marsh restoration by means of self-regulating tidal gate – Avon estuary, South Devon, UK

Abstract Salt marshes provide important regulating ecosystem services, including natural flood defence and carbon sequestration, which adds value to restoration and biodiversity offsetting schemes. This study evaluates the success of salt marsh restoration using a Regulated Tidal Exchange (RTE) system in SW England, i.e., a self-regulating tidal gate (SRT), in controlling the partial saline inundation of a 14-ha area of former salt marsh reclaimed for agriculture in 1760. A combination of (a) direct hydrodynamic monitoring of water and sediment flux and (b) repeat surveys to evaluate morphological and ecological (plants and foraminifera) changes over a 5-year period, was implemented immediately following SRT commissioning. Morphological changes were limited to the proximity of the SRT system due to limited sediment influx yielding sedimentation rates that were an order of magnitude below a nearby natural marsh. Ecological change to an ephemeral salt marsh community was only detected after 5 years of inundation cycles, with the delayed response attributed to (a) an initial limited tidal inundation due to conservative SRT settings, followed by (b) excessive inundation due to excessive rainfall and recurring SRT failure in an open position, and (c) a lack of sediment and propagule supply caused by (a) & (b) and the relatively narrow inlet pipe used in the SRT system. While the ecological response under optimum SRT settings was encouraging, the lack of perennial plants and limited foraminifera abundance demonstrated that the marsh was far from reaching natural status. We surmise that this is primarily due to inundation being more rapid than drainage leading to excessive submergence during a tidal cycle. Our study shows that the design of tidal inundation schemes requires a synergistic understanding of core ecological and geomorphological approaches to assess viability and success. We conclude that SRT can be a useful technique for intertidal habitat creation where there are significant site constraints (especially flood risk), but we need to be realistic in our expectations of what it can achieve in terms of delivering a perennial salt marsh community.

[1]  P. Adam.  Saltmarshes in a time of change , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[2]  P. Meire,et al.  A new technique for tidal habitat restoration: Evaluation of its hydrological potentials , 2011 .

[3]  Gemma L. Harvey,et al.  Understanding system disturbance and ecosystem services in restored saltmarshes: Integrating physical and biogeochemical processes , 2012 .

[4]  W. Blake,et al.  Tide-driven dune migration and sediment transport on an intertidal shoal in a shallow estuary in Devon, UK , 2009 .

[5]  A. Gurnell,et al.  Evidence for hydrochory and the deposition of viable seeds within winter flow‐deposited sediments: the River Dove, Derbyshire, UK , 2003 .

[6]  P. W. French.  Managed realignment The developing story of a comparatively new approach to soft engineering , 2006 .

[7]  J. Bakker,et al.  Restoration of salt‐marsh vegetation in relation to site suitability, species pool and dispersal traits , 2007 .

[8]  E. Barbier,et al.  The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm , 2011 .

[9]  A. Grant,et al.  Constraints on Salt Marsh Development Following Managed Coastal Realignment: Dispersal Limitation or Environmental Tolerance? , 2012 .

[10]  D. Walling,et al.  Floodplain Sedimentation: A Preliminary Investigation of Contemporary Deposition within the Lower Reaches of the River Culm, Devon, UK , 1987 .

[11]  S. Stubbles.  Responses of recent benthic foraminifera to metal pollution in south west England estuaries : a study of impact and change , 1999 .

[12]  R. Morris.  Managed realignment: A sediment management perspective , 2012 .

[13]  Julien Martin,et al.  Structured decision making as a proactive approach to dealing with sea level rise in Florida , 2011 .

[14]  J. Hall‐Spencer,et al.  Foraminifera of the Fal Estuary (Cornwall), including taxa associated with maerl beds , 2015 .

[15]  R. Wilby,et al.  Stormiest winter on record for Ireland and UK , 2014 .

[16]  P. Carey,et al.  Sediment transfer and accumulation in two contrasting salt marsh/mudflat systems: the Seine estuary (France) and the Medway estuary (UK) , 2007, Hydrobiologia.

[17]  D. Reed,et al.  Effect of hydrologic management on marsh surface sediment deposition in coastal Louisiana , 1997 .

[18]  D. Charman,et al.  AN INTERTIDAL FORAMINIFERA-BASED TRANSFER FUNCTION FOR RECONSTRUCTING HOLOCENE SEA-LEVEL CHANGE IN SOUTHWEST ENGLAND , 2006 .

[19]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Shifting sands? Coastal protection by sand banks, beaches and dunes , 2014 .

[20]  Anissia C. White.  Managing the retreat : understanding the transition to salt marsh in coastal realignment projects , 2015 .

[21]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change , 2013, Nature.

[22]  J. Bakker,et al.  Salt-marsh restoration: evaluating the success of de-embankments in north-west Europe , 2005 .

[23]  N. Davidson,et al.  Nature conservation and estuaries in Great Britain , 1991 .

[24]  A. Grant,et al.  Does managed coastal realignment create saltmarshes with ‘equivalent biological characteristics’ to natural reference sites? , 2012 .

[25]  Matthias Kudella,et al.  Wave attenuation over coastal salt marshes under storm surge conditions , 2014 .

[26]  J. S. Rodwell,et al.  British Plant Communities: British Plant Communities , 2000 .

[27]  C. Smart,et al.  Foraminifera from the Fowey Estuary, Cornwall , 2015 .

[28]  Anthony J. Davy,et al.  Colonization of a newly developing salt marsh: disentangling independent effects of elevation and redox potential on halophytes , 2011 .

[29]  David B. Stephenson,et al.  A Multimodel Assessment of Future Projections of North Atlantic and European Extratropical Cyclones in the CMIP5 Climate Models , 2013 .

[30]  Anthony J. Davy,et al.  Drainage and Elevation as Factors in the Restoration of Salt Marsh in Britain , 2002 .

[31]  Patrick Meire,et al.  Flood control areas as an opportunity to restore estuarine habitat , 2006 .

[32]  M. Hudson,et al.  Intertidal mudflat and saltmarsh conservation and sustainable use in the UK: a review. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  P. Bernatchez,et al.  Sediment transport in a cold climate salt marsh (St. Lawrence Estuary, Canada), the importance of vegetation and waves , 2012 .

[34]  D. Charman,et al.  Foraminifera, testate amoebae and diatoms as sea‐level indicators in UK saltmarshes: a quantitative multiproxy approach , 2001 .

[35]  J. Bakker,et al.  What factors determined restoration success of a salt marsh ten years after de-embankment? , 2016 .

[36]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Identifying knowledge gaps hampering application of intertidal habitats in coastal protection: Oppor , 2014 .