The Effects of Personalized Recommendations with Popularity Information on Sales - A Field Study in Grocery Retailing

In consumer and information systems research, it remains unclear how consumers consider smartphone app recommendations in the course of their decision making process that leads to product choices in the physical store. Moreover, it is unclear which type of information smartphone apps should transport to consumers and if there are any customer segmentation criteria for smartphone app design. With respect to the theoretical and managerial importance of recommendation services in the form of smartphone apps we want to shed some light on this topic. Combining literature from the fields of IS and marketing research, we hypothesize that personalized recommendations via smartphone apps can help to boost sales in physical grocery stores. Furthermore, we hypothesize that additional popularity information (in the form of “stars”) does not amplify the positive effect of personalized recommendations. In addition, we assume that the effects of recommendation usage differ for men and women. We conducted a field study with a European grocery retailer to test our hypotheses. Finally, we discuss first implications as well as central limitations of our research and present the next research steps.

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[2]  France Bélanger,et al.  Gender differences in perceptions of web-based shopping , 2002, CACM.

[3]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior , 2006 .

[4]  Yoon Ho Cho,et al.  A personalized recommendation procedure for Internet shopping support , 2002, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[5]  Hans van der Heijden Mobile decision support for in-store purchase decisions , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Wolfgang Maass,et al.  In-store consumer behavior: How mobile recommendation agents influence usage intentions, product purchases, and store preferences , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  April Lane Benson,et al.  I shop, therefore I am : compulsive buying and the search for self , 2004 .

[8]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[9]  Arnold Kamis,et al.  Using an Attribute-Based Decision Support System for User-Customized Products Online: An Experimental Investigation , 2008, MIS Q..

[10]  René Riedl,et al.  Are There Neural Gender Differences in Online Trust? An fMRI Study on the Perceived Trustworthiness of eBay Offers , 2010, MIS Q..

[11]  Docki Saraswati,et al.  Managing the Flow of Information on the Factory Floor , 2000, DIISM.

[12]  B. Kahn,et al.  Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? , 1998 .

[13]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[14]  Arik Ragowsky,et al.  Establishing Trust in Electronic Commerce Through Online Word of Mouth: An Examination Across Genders , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  Influences on consumer use of word-of-mouth recommendation sources , 1997 .

[16]  S. Sénécal,et al.  The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices , 2004 .

[17]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces , 1997 .

[18]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[19]  Yi-Cheng Ku,et al.  Personalized Content Recommendation and User Satisfaction: Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Findings , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  G. Harrison,et al.  Field experiments , 1924, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[21]  R. Kohli,et al.  Internet Recommendation Systems , 2000 .

[22]  Shachar Kariv,et al.  Observational learning under imperfect information , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[23]  G. Zipf,et al.  Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. , 1949 .

[24]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[25]  D. Griffith,et al.  Drivers of local merchant loyalty: Understanding the influence of gender and shopping motives , 2006 .

[26]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[27]  R. Olshavsky,et al.  The dual role of informational social influence: Implications for marketing management , 1987 .

[28]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  The Sound of Silence: Observational Learning in the U.S. Kidney Market , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[29]  Shintaro Okazaki Exploring Gender Effects in a Mobile Advertising Context:On the Evaluation of Trust, Attitudes, and Recall , 2007 .

[30]  Kuo-Hsiang Chen,et al.  How different information types affect viewer's attention on internet advertising , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Markus Schweizer,et al.  Scale Development for Consumer Confusion , 2006 .

[32]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[33]  R. Bharat Rao,et al.  Browsers or Buyers in Cyberspace? An Investigation of Factors Influencing Electronic Exchange , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[35]  A. Buunk,et al.  Gender differences in adolescent advertising response: The role of involvement and message claim , 2013 .

[36]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact , 2007, MIS Q..

[38]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Understanding Customer Trust in Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce, Web-Mediated Electronic Commerce, and Traditional Commerce , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[39]  M. Gilly,et al.  A dyadic study of interpersonal information search , 1998 .

[40]  Andrew D. Gershoff,et al.  Recommendation or Evaluation? Task Sensitivity in Information Source Selection , 2001 .

[41]  Rex Eugene Pereira,et al.  Influence of Query-Based Decision Aids on Consumer Decision Making in Electronic Commerce , 2001, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[42]  L. Festinger Cognitive dissonance. , 1962, Scientific American.

[43]  D. Gefen,et al.  Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services , 2004 .

[44]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[45]  Paul L. Sauer,et al.  Hedonic shopping motivation and co-shopper influence on utilitarian grocery shopping in superstores , 2014 .

[46]  R. Rizley,et al.  Innovations in Shopper Marketing: Current Insights and Future Research Issues , 2011 .

[47]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  How Does Popularity Information Affect Choices? A Field Experiment , 2009 .

[48]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  A First Course in Bayesian Statistical Methods , 2009 .

[49]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  J. Baker,et al.  The effects of appropriateness of service contact personnel dress on customer expectations of service quality and purchase intention: The moderating influences of involvement and gender , 2004 .

[51]  Lori D. Wolin Gender Issues in Advertising , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[52]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Online Social Interactions: A Natural Experiment on Word of Mouth versus Observational Learning , 2010 .

[53]  H. Dittmar,et al.  Buying on the Internet: Gender Differences in On-line and Conventional Buying Motivations , 2004 .

[54]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Shopping Behavior Across Online and Offline Channels for Grocery Products: The Moderating Effects of Household and Product Characteristics , 2010 .

[55]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[56]  G. Balabanis,et al.  Consumer confusion from own brand lookalikes: An exploratory investigation , 1997 .

[57]  T. Hennig-Thurau,et al.  Consumer confusion proneness: scale development, validation, and application , 2007 .

[58]  J. Beattie,et al.  Objects, decision considerations and self-image in men's and women's impulse purchases. , 1996, Acta psychologica.