Improving the undergraduate science experience through an evidence-based framework for design, implementation and evaluation of flipped learning

Flipped Learning (FL) is a student-centred pedagogical approach where new content is introduced prior to class which permits more time during class for active learning. Despite the growing body of evidence of the effectiveness of FL, many educators are reluctant to adopt this approach to teaching or are unsure of how to implement FL in their classes. Many students are uncertain of how to adapt their approaches to learning to a FL curriculum. In response to these challenges and calls for a robust framework to guide the design and implementation of FL, we developed the Flipped Teacher and Flipped Learner (FTFL) Framework based on the pedagogical literature. This paper reports on the use of our FTFL framework in the redesign of a large first year science subject from a traditional delivery to a FL delivery. We evaluated the efficacy of the redesign using a mixed methods approach with data on students’ interactions with FL activities, and student and educator experiences. Findings from two iterations of the redesign indicate successful implementation of FL through high student engagement with online and class materials, and positive feedback from students and academics. Using the FTFL framework to guide the design and integration of FL, with an emphasis on clear communication, is key to our successful FL intervention and support of student learning.

[1]  Kumar Yelamarthi,et al.  A Flipped First-Year Digital Circuits Course for Engineering and Technology Students , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[2]  Jacqueline E. McLaughlin,et al.  Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum , 2015, Medical education.

[3]  Elaine Huber,et al.  A review of the literature on flipping the STEM classroom: Preliminary findings , 2016 .

[4]  Michael Christie,et al.  Activating learning in engineering education using ICT and the concept of ‘Flipping the classroom’ , 2017 .

[5]  Adam M Persky,et al.  An Eight-year Retrospective Study in “Flipped” Pharmacokinetics Courses , 2014, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[6]  Jorge Reyna,et al.  Designing your Flipped Classroom: an evidence-based framework to guide the flipped teacher and the flipped learner , 2015 .

[7]  Manjula D. Sharma,et al.  Online lecture recordings and lecture attendance: Investigating student preferences in a large first year psychology course , 2016 .

[8]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[9]  Kerry Dickson,et al.  Standing room only: faculty intervention increases voluntary lecture attendance and performance for disadvantaged year 1 Bioscience students , 2016 .

[10]  Neela Griffiths,et al.  Supporting student transition: embedding reading practices into the first year Science curriculum , 2016 .

[11]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Min Kyu Kim,et al.  The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  Gabriela C. Weaver,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Flipped Format General Chemistry Course , 2015 .

[14]  John B. Biggs,et al.  Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does , 1999 .

[15]  Jeff Cain,et al.  Research, Perspectives, and Recommendations on Implementing the Flipped Classroom , 2016, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.