Examining what factors affect inter-agency working in missing children investigations

Despite responsibility for missing children belonging to multiple agencies, police perceive this to be falling heavily on their shoulders, placing substantial demand on finite resources. Drawing on thematic analysis of 24 interviews conducted with police, local authority, social service, and care home staff from across three UK boroughs, the following study seeks to identify what factors facilitate and hinder inter-agency working in the prevention and response to missing children and why. Findings highlight that inter-agency working is facilitated by having ‘direct points of contact’ across agencies to facilitate information sharing. Inter-agency working is hindered by ‘inconsistent definitions of missing’, limited ‘understanding of roles and responsibilities’, ‘service demand’, ‘technological issues’, ‘fear’, and ‘discrepancies in responses to missing’. Evidence suggests that partnership working would be facilitated by improving shared understanding of missing, roles and responsibilities, and having direct points of contact across agencies.

[1]  S. Waring,et al.  “Dare to Share”: Improving Information Sharing and Risk Assessment in Multiteam Systems Managing Offender Probation , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[2]  S. Müller,et al.  Coordinating knowledge work across technologies: Evidence from critical care practices , 2022, Inf. Organ..

[3]  D. Wilkins,et al.  Repeat missing child reports: Prevalence, timing, and risk factors , 2022, Children and Youth Services Review.

[4]  Ciarán Murphy.  ‘I don’t want my face on the front page of The Sun’: the ‘Baby P effect’ as a barrier to social worker discretion , 2022, Journal of Children's Services.

[5]  Stacey M. Conchie,et al.  Communication and coordination across event phases: A multi‐team system emergency response , 2021, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

[6]  G. Barnes,et al.  Targeting Missing Persons Most Likely to Come to Harm Among 92,681 Cases Reported to Devon and Cornwall Police , 2020, Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing.

[7]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Situation Awareness in multi-agency emergency response: Models, methods and applications , 2020 .

[8]  Rose M. Baker,et al.  A New Multiteam System (MTS) Effectiveness Model , 2020, Syst..

[9]  S. Waring,et al.  Decision‐making in multiagency multiteam systems operating in extreme environments , 2020, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

[10]  Helene Joffe,et al.  Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines , 2020 .

[11]  D. Pritchard,et al.  A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand: Evaluating Police Perception of UK Missing Person Definition , 2019, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research.

[12]  A. Sidebottom,et al.  Missing children: risks, repeats and responses , 2019, CrimRxiv.

[13]  Joseph A. Allen,et al.  Evaluating the use of multiteam systems to manage the complexity of inpatient falls in rural hospitals. , 2019, Health services research.

[14]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis , 2019, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health.

[15]  Laurence Alison,et al.  The role of information sharing on decision delay during multiteam disaster response , 2019, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[16]  A. Sidebottom,et al.  Missing Children: On the Extent, Patterns, and Correlates of Repeat Disappearances by Young People , 2018, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice.

[17]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection , 2018 .

[18]  Amanda Nolen,et al.  Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? , 2018, Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning.

[19]  Laurence Alison,et al.  Information sharing in interteam responses to disaster , 2018, Journal of occupational and organizational psychology.

[20]  C. Hayden,et al.  The blue light social services? Responding to repeat reports to the police of people missing from institutional locations , 2018 .

[21]  Jimmie Manning,et al.  In Vivo Coding , 2017 .

[22]  Bridget C. O’Brien,et al.  Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking , 2017, Medical education.

[23]  C. Boddy.  Sample size for qualitative research , 2016 .

[24]  C. Hayden.  Children missing from care , 2016 .

[25]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Distributed situation awareness , 2016 .

[26]  William S. Kramer,et al.  The Science of Multiteam Systems , 2015 .

[27]  Lawrence R. Ness,et al.  Are We There Yet - Data Saturation in Qualitative Research (TQR Published).pdf , 2015 .

[28]  Ciaran Heavey,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems and Firm Performance: An Upper Echelons Perspective , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[29]  N. Fyfe,et al.  Missing persons: the processes and challenges of police investigation , 2015 .

[30]  Christine Owen,et al.  Role Clarity, Swift Trust and Multi‐Agency Coordination , 2015 .

[31]  C. Bradbury‐Jones,et al.  Young People's Experiences of Going Missing From Care: A Qualitative Investigation using Peer Researchers , 2014 .

[32]  Marissa L. Shuffler,et al.  The future of multiteam systems: implications for research and practice , 2014 .

[33]  J. Pearce.  ‘What's Going On’ to Safeguard Children and Young People from Child Sexual Exploitation: A Review of Local Safeguarding Children Boards’ Work to Protect Children from Sexual Exploitation , 2014 .

[34]  M. McHugh.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic , 2012, Biochemia medica.

[35]  Greg Guest,et al.  Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research , 2012 .

[36]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Hallowed Grounds: The Role of Cultural Values, Practices, and Institutions in TMS in an Offshored Complex Engineering Services Project , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[37]  J. Schraagen,et al.  Information Sharing During Crisis Management in Hierarchical vs. Network Teams , 2010 .

[38]  E. Munro.  Learning to Reduce Risk in Child Protection , 2010 .

[39]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises , 2010, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[40]  Naim Kapucu,et al.  Collaborative emergency management: better community organising, better public preparedness and response. , 2008, Disasters.

[41]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[42]  J. Manthorpe,et al.  Partnership means protection? Perceptions of the effectiveness of multi‐agency working and the regulatory framework within adult protection in England and Wales, , 2007 .

[43]  K. Kinder,et al.  multi-agency working , 2005 .

[44]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[45]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Multiteam Systems: The Next Chapter , 2018 .

[46]  Alan D. Pearman,et al.  Information sharing during multi-agency major incidents , 2011, ASIST.

[47]  C. Gibson,et al.  Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach , 2008 .

[48]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[49]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .