Risk communication in the internet age: The rise of disorganized skepticism

Abstract Communicating risks has become a core ingredient in the regulatory functions of government, interest group advocacy, public health, and corporate relations. The channels of risk communication have grown in complexity along with the development and expansion of the Internet and the birth of personalized blogging. This paper discusses three stages in the development of risk communication as an area of study and research. It examines the way risk is framed in three channels of communication, newsprint, the Expanded Academic Index, and Google using the example of the controversial chemical perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The paper concludes that the Internet, as illustrated by the Google search engine, has created more opportunities for citizen learning and expanded the breadth and channels of risk communication, while also providing new opportunities for stakeholders to influence the message. Democritization of information does not necessarily create greater concordance between the cultural and technical assessment of risk.

[1]  P. J. Hakkinen,et al.  Risk analysis: A guide to principles and methods for analyzing health and environmental risks , 1990 .

[2]  R. Kasperson The social amplification of risk: progress in developing an integrative framework of risk’, in S. , 1992 .

[3]  S. Tesh,et al.  No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action , 1992 .

[4]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Social Theories of Risk , 1992 .

[5]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Financial interest and its disclosure in scientific publications. , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  R. Merton Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[7]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Cultural theory and risk analysis , 1992 .

[9]  Kerry E. Rodgers Multiple Meanings of Alar after the Scare: Implications for Closure , 1996 .

[10]  C. Gross,et al.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[11]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[12]  Sheldon Krimsky,et al.  Environmental Hazards: Communicating Risks as a Social Process , 1988 .

[13]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science , 1992 .

[14]  S. Calandrillo Vanishing Vaccinations: Why Are So Many Americans Opting Out of Vaccinating Their Children? , 2005, University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School.

[15]  Hans-Jürgen Bucher,et al.  Crisis Communication and the Internet: Risk and Trust in a Global Media , 2002, First Monday.

[16]  D. Demeritt,et al.  The UK Climate Change Programme and communication with local authorities , 2004 .