Interbasin Water Transfers: The Brazilian Experience and International Case Comparisons

This paper critically examines Brazil’s transbasin diversion experiences and two select, large-scale transbasin projects outside of Brazil. Rather than simply compare Brazil’s experiences with international cases, the authors explore the historical context of the projects, focusing on the water resources and environmental regulatory and institutional frameworks in place during the initial proposals and how they influenced the projects’ development and completion rates. Huge investments, the lengthy time span between the date of the initial project proposals and the start of construction, the need to garner public and political support, and more recently, the need to fulfill national and regional environmental laws are major factors underlying heated public debates about the proposed projects. After a broad discussion about the subject, the authors examine a recently approved large-scale Brazilian project, the Sao Francisco river transbasin diversion. This river diversion project is considered crucial to the economic development of Brazil’s semi-arid northeastern region. Despite the fact that this government-funded project was debated for several decades among the various stakeholders, it was approved under Brazil’s newly formed water resources regulatory and environmental framework, which enabled improvements in various key technical aspects of the project, and greater involvement of various key social players.

[1]  M. Mariño,et al.  System Dynamics Analysis for Managing Iran’s Zayandeh-Rud River Basin , 2009 .

[2]  Vujica Yevjevich,et al.  Water Diversions and Interbasin Transfers , 2001 .

[3]  Neil S. Grigg,et al.  Water Resources Management: Principles, Regulations, and Cases , 1996 .

[4]  Lucas E. Calvo Gobbetti,et al.  WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT IN THE SAO PAULO METROPOLITAN AREA, FORMULATED USING AN INTEGRATED APPROACH , 1996 .

[5]  Benedito P. F. Braga,et al.  Pacto federativo e gestão de águas , 2008 .

[6]  Ian White,et al.  Inter-Basin Water Transfer: Case Studies from Australia, United States, Canada, China and India , 2007 .

[7]  B. Braga,et al.  Integrated Water Resources Management in a Federative Country: The Case of Brazil , 2009 .

[8]  J. Deason,et al.  Water policy in the United States: a perspective , 2001 .

[9]  Steven Stewart,et al.  A System Dynamics Model to Evaluate Temporary Water Transfers in the Mexican Conchos Basin , 2010 .

[10]  Benedito P. F. Braga,et al.  Water Charges: Paying for the Commons in Brazil , 2005 .

[11]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Consideration of Trends in Evaluating Inter-basin Water Transfer Alternatives within a Fuzzy Decision Making Framework , 2009 .

[12]  Tsehaie Woldai,et al.  Water Allocation as a Planning Tool to Minimise Water Use Conflicts in the Upper Ewaso Ng’iro North Basin, Kenya , 2010 .

[13]  L. Lebel,et al.  The Politics of Scale, Position, and Place in the Governance of Water Resources in the Mekong Region , 2005 .

[14]  Mario T. L. Barros,et al.  The São Francisco River Water Transfer System: An Optimization Model for Planning Operation , 2008 .

[15]  I. Hespanhol,et al.  Um novo paradigma para a gestão de recursos hídricos , 2008 .

[16]  Najmeh Mahjouri,et al.  Optimal Inter-Basin Water Allocation Using Crisp and Fuzzy Shapley Games , 2010 .

[17]  A. Wolf,et al.  Managing and transforming water conflicts , 2009 .