Initial situation analysis through problem graph

Abstract In current design processes supported by R&D department in companies, thorough analyses of all possible dimensions that are linked with the problem and the past experiences developed in the problem domain represents an important stage (sometimes called “problem definition” or “problem formulation”) often neglected by designers. This stage, mainly what we call the initial situation analysis (ISA) in this paper, is obviously located at the early stages of a project. Designers’ expectations during this stage are to rapidly gather all the potential information useful to precisely describe the problem and to collect and synthesize known solutions from experiences prior to engaging the following design stages. The aim of this article is to develop a methodology for conducting an ISA stage, namely a problem graph. This methodology can be used to complete existing methods or to be added to classical design process as a first step. An example conducted in the metallurgy process area is used to illustrate the proposed methodology.

[1]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[2]  Roberto Torretti,et al.  Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles, sous la direction de Barbara Cassin.Paris: Éditions du Seuil/Dictionnaires Le Robert, 2004 , 2005 .

[3]  R. Volkema Problem Formulation in Planning and Design , 1983 .

[4]  Denis Cavallucci,et al.  From TRIZ to OTSM-TRIZ: addressing complexity challenges in inventive design , 2007 .

[5]  Sarah M. Ryan,et al.  Scaffolding To Improve Reasoning Skills In Problem Formulation , 2008 .

[6]  D. A. Cowan Developing a Process Model of Problem Recognition , 1986 .

[7]  Joseph De Feo,et al.  Creating strategic change more efficiently with a new Design for Six Sigma process , 2002 .

[8]  Renée M. Filius,et al.  Knowledge management in the HRD office: a comparison of three cases , 2000 .

[9]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[10]  Roland De Guio,et al.  A framework for OTSMTRIZ-based computer support to be used in complex problem management , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[11]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Formal Engineering Design Synthesis: Contents , 2001 .

[12]  Nicholas Ross Milton,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition in Practice: A Step-by-step Guide , 2007 .

[13]  Igor Razgon,et al.  Complexity Analysis of Heuristic CSP Search Algorithms , 2005, CSCLP.

[14]  Daniel E. Geer The Problem Statement is the Problem , 2005, IEEE Secur. Priv..

[15]  W. Traczyk Structural representations of unstructured knowledge , 2005 .

[16]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education , 2004 .

[18]  Noel León-Rovira Trends in Computer Aided Innovation - Second IFIP Working Conference on Computer Aided Innovation, October 8-9 2007, Michigan, USA , 2007, IFIP CAI.

[19]  Daniel E. Geer When Is a Product a Security Product? , 2005, IEEE Secur. Priv..

[20]  G. Altshuller Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .