Impact of Various Kernels on Support Vector Machine Classification Performance for Treating Wart Disease

This study displays the impacts of different types of Kernel functions for improving the learning capacity of Support Vector Machine (SVM) in treating two common types of warts (plantar and common warts). The impacts of four Kernel functions of (SVM): Normalized Polynomial Kernel (NP), Polynomial Kernel (PK), Radial Basis Function Kernel (RBF), and Pearson VII function based Universal Kernel (PUK) have been examined On two sets of data called “Cryotherapy” and “Immunotherapy”. Which are universally regarded as the best two methods to treat wart disease using Weka workbench. The first dataset called “Cryotherapy” consists of information about 90 patients and contains 7 features. The second dataset called “Immunotherapy” consists of information about 90 patients and contains 8 features. For presenting classification performance impacts each of Accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F-measure and confusion matrix for each kernel has been utilized. According to the results obtained, it was found that each of PUK and RBF performs best classification performance on “Cryotherapy” dataset with 97.77% accuracy whereas each of PK and PUK performs best classification performance on “Immunotherapy” dataset with 81.11% accuracy.

[1]  Steve Renals,et al.  Evaluation of kernel methods for speaker verification and identification , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[2]  Robert Powers,et al.  Protein NMR recall, precision, and F-measure scores (RPF scores): structure quality assessment measures based on information retrieval statistics. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Training Invariant Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[4]  R. Alizadehsani,et al.  Intralesional immunotherapy compared to cryotherapy in the treatment of warts , 2017, International journal of dermatology.

[5]  P. K. Panigrahi,et al.  A Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Spam E-mail Filtering , 2012, 2012 Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks.

[6]  M. J. Pringle,et al.  SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE CLASSIFICATION OF OBJECT-BASED DATA FOR CROP MAPPING, USING MULTI-TEMPORAL LANDSAT IMAGERY , 2012 .

[7]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[8]  Shrawan Kumar Trivedi,et al.  Effect of Various Kernels and Feature Selection Methods on SVM Performance for Detecting Email Spams , 2013 .

[9]  Divya Tomar,et al.  A survey on Data Mining approaches for Healthcare , 2013, BSBT 2013.

[10]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  An expert system for selecting wart treatment method , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.