Testing for complementarity and substitutability in case of multiple practices

Recent empirical studies of firm-level performance have been concerned with establishing potential complementarity between more than two organizational practices. These papers have drawn conclusions on the basis of potentially biased estimates of pair-wise interaction effects between such practices. In this paper we develop a consistent testing framework based on multiple inequality constraints that derives from the definition of (strict) super modularity as suggested by Athey and Stern (1998). Monte Carlo results show that the multiple restrictions test is superior for performance models with high explanatory power. If practices explain only a minor part of organizational performance no test is able to identify complementarity or substitutability in a satisfactory manner.

[1]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External Technology Acquisition, and Cooperation in R&D , 2002 .

[2]  Giovanni Maggi,et al.  Diversity and Trade , 1998 .

[3]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[4]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Complementarities in Innovation Policy , 2001 .

[5]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  Franz C. Palm,et al.  Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality , 1986 .

[7]  A. Shapiro.  A Conjecture Related to Chi-Bar-Squared Distributions , 1987 .

[8]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[9]  Hong-Jie Sun.  A general reduction method for n–variate normal orthant probability , 1988 .

[10]  A. Shapiro.  Asymptotic distribution of test statistics in the analysis of moment structures under inequality constraints , 1985 .

[11]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[12]  F. Wolak.  Testing inequality constraints in linear econometric models , 1989 .

[13]  S. Athey,et al.  An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories About Complimentarity in Organizational Design , 1998 .

[14]  A. Arora.  Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note , 1996 .

[15]  Frank A. Wolak,et al.  The Local Nature of Hypothesis Tests Involving Inequality Constraints in Nonlinear Models , 1991 .

[16]  工藤 昭夫,et al.  A Multivariate Analogue of the One-Sided Testについての一注意 (多次元統計解析の数理的研究) , 1979 .

[17]  Paul A. Ruud,et al.  Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives theoretical and computational results , 1996 .

[18]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Comparison of Methods for the Computation of Multivariate t Probabilities , 2002 .

[19]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[20]  Nicolaj Siggelkow,et al.  Misperceiving Interactions Among Complements and Substitutes: Organizational Consequences , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[21]  C. Gouriéroux,et al.  Likelihood Ratio Test, Wald Test, and Kuhn-Tucker Test in Linear Models with Inequality Constraints on the Regression Parameters , 1982 .

[22]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[23]  S. Athey,et al.  The impact of information technology on emergency health care outcomes. , 2002, The Rand journal of economics.

[24]  Alan,et al.  Comparison of Methods for the Computationof Multivariate Normal Probabilities , 1993 .

[25]  J. V. Reenen,et al.  Skill-Biased Organizational Change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments , 2001 .

[26]  Aija Leiponen,et al.  Skills and innovation , 2005 .

[27]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .