Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model.

PURPOSE To combine dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with x-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) of mammary gland tissue samples from mice to identify the spatial distribution of gadolinium after intravenous injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS C3(1) Sv-40 large T antigen transgenic mice (n = 23) were studied with institutional animal care and use committee approval. Twelve mice underwent DCE MR imaging after injection of gadodiamide, and gadolinium concentration-time curves were fit to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with the following parameters: transfer constant (K(trans)) and volume of extravascular extracellular space per unit volume of tissue (v(e)). Eleven mice received gadodiamide before XFM. These mice were sacrificed 2 minutes after injection, and frozen slices containing ducts distended with murine ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were prepared for XFM. One mouse received saline and served as the control animal. Elemental gadolinium concentrations were measured in and around the ducts with DCIS. Hematoxylin-eosin-stained slices of mammary tissues were obtained after DCE MR imaging and XFM. RESULTS Ducts containing DCIS were unambiguously identified on MR images. DCE MR imaging revealed gadolinium uptake along the length of ducts with DCIS, with an average K(trans) of 0.21 min(-1) +/- 0.14 (standard deviation) and an average v(e) of 0.40 +/- 0.16. XFM revealed gadolinium uptake inside ducts with DCIS, with an average concentration of 0.475 mmol/L +/- 0.380; the corresponding value for DCE MR imaging was 0.30 mmol/L +/- 0.13. CONCLUSION These results provide insight into the physiologic basis of contrast enhancement of DCIS lesions on DCE MR images: Gadolinium penetrates and collects inside neoplastic ducts.

[1]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. , 2007, Radiology.

[2]  W. Kaiser,et al.  High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  D. D. Billheimer,et al.  Repeatability of a reference region model for analysis of murine DCE‐MRI data at 7T , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  S. Lutsenko,et al.  Quantitative imaging of metals in tissues , 2009, BioMetals.

[5]  R. Warren,et al.  Characterization of pure high-grade DCIS on magnetic resonance imaging using the evolving breast MR lexicon terminology: can it be differentiated from pure invasive disease? , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  G. Newstead,et al.  MR imaging of the breast. , 1995, Radiology.

[7]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[8]  Robert J. Erhardt,et al.  Are gadolinium contrast agents suitable for gadolinium neutron capture therapy? , 2005, Neurological research.

[9]  Simone Schrading,et al.  MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study , 2007, The Lancet.

[10]  Cheryl Jorcyk,et al.  The C3(1)/SV40 T-antigen transgenic mouse model of mammary cancer: ductal epithelial cell targeting with multistage progression to carcinoma , 2000, Oncogene.

[11]  S. Harms The Use of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ , 2005, The breast journal.

[12]  Claudia Weidensteiner,et al.  Quantitative dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in tumor‐bearing rats and mice with inversion recovery TrueFISP and two contrast agents at 4.7 T , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Determination of the Presence and Extent of Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ by Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, The breast journal.

[14]  Daniel F Chen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging captures the biology of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Michael Brady,et al.  Extracting and visualizing physiological parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  J. Green,et al.  Prostate and mammary adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice carrying a rat C3(1) simian virus 40 large tumor antigen fusion gene. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Xiaobing Fan,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of mouse cardiac MRI acquired with open birdcage, single loop surface and volume birdcage coils , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  G. Newstead,et al.  Detection of in situ mammary cancer in a transgenic mouse model: in vitro and in vivo MRI studies demonstrate histopathologic correlation , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Edna Schechtman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vasculature in benign and malignant breast lesions , 2005, Cancer.

[20]  M. Mehta,et al.  Gadolinium in human glioblastoma cells for gadolinium neutron capture therapy. , 2001, Cancer research.

[21]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[22]  T. Frenzel,et al.  Preclinical investigation to compare different gadolinium-based contrast agents regarding their propensity to release gadolinium in vivo and to trigger nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like lesions , 2008, European Radiology.

[23]  U. Fischer,et al.  MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? , 1998, Radiology.

[24]  B. Lai,et al.  Gadolinium-conjugated TiO2-DNA oligonucleotide nanoconjugates show prolonged intracellular retention period and T1-weighted contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance images. , 2008, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[25]  O Lucidarme,et al.  Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  Stefan Vogt,et al.  DNA-TiO2 nanoconjugates labeled with magnetic resonance contrast agents. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  M. Schnall,et al.  MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1997, Radiology.

[28]  Wei Huang,et al.  The magnetic resonance shutter speed discriminates vascular properties of malignant and benign breast tumors in vivo , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Stefan Vogt,et al.  MAPS : A set of software tools for analysis and visualization of 3D X-ray fluorescence data sets , 2003 .

[30]  G S Karczmar,et al.  A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: Input functions derived from reference tissues , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.