Large-scale noninvasive genetic monitoring of wolverines using scats reveals density dependent adult survival

Noninvasive genetic monitoring has the potential to estimate vital rates essential for conservation and management of many species. In a long-term genetic capture-mark-recapture study using scats we evaluated temporal variation in adult survival in a wolverine (Gulo gulo) population in southern Norway. In contrast to most previous studies of large mammals we found evidence for negative density dependence in adult survival in this large carnivore. Both sexes showed the same pattern of density dependence, with higher annual survival rates in adult females than males. In addition, we also found an additive mortality effect of harvesting in the population, resulting in the lowest adult survival rates at a combination of high population density and high harvest rate. The additive effects of density and harvest on adult survival of wolverines have relevance to the conservation and management of solitary carnivores with strong intrasexual territoriality, especially for species where combats among conspecifics can cause serious injury or even mortality.

[1]  S. Puechmaille,et al.  Empirical evaluation of non‐invasive capture–mark–recapture estimation of population size based on a single sampling session , 2007 .

[2]  Henrik Brøseth,et al.  Colonization History and Noninvasive Monitoring of a Reestablished Wolverine Population , 2004 .

[3]  H. Andreassen,et al.  Male turnover reduces population growth: an enclosure experiment on voles. , 2006, Ecology.

[4]  A. Landa,et al.  The relationship between population density and body size of wolverines Gulo gulo in Scandinavia , 1995, Wildlife Biology.

[5]  C. Davis,et al.  Isolation, variability, and cross‐species amplification of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the family Mustelidae , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[6]  J. Swenson,et al.  Infanticide caused by hunting of male bears , 1997, Nature.

[7]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  An evaluation of field and non-invasive genetic methods to estimate brown bear (Ursus arctos) population size , 2006 .

[8]  Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution , 1989 .

[9]  J. Swenson,et al.  The near extinction and recovery of brown bears in Scandinavia in relation to the bear management policies of Norway and Sweden , 1995, Wildlife Biology.

[10]  Barbara F. Händel,et al.  Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway , 2007 .

[11]  L. Waits,et al.  Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[12]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[13]  Gordon Luikart,et al.  Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  J. Swenson,et al.  Active wolverine Gulo gulo dens as a minimum population estimator in Scandinavia , 1998, Wildlife Biology.

[15]  Paul L. Leberg,et al.  Biases associated with population estimation using molecular tagging , 2000 .

[16]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  MICHAEL K. SCHWARTZ,et al.  Sources and Patterns of Wolverine Mortality in Western Montana , 2007 .

[18]  H. Ellegren,et al.  Paternity and mating system in wolverines Gulo gulo , 2007 .

[19]  Peter Segerström,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF FEMALE WOLVERINES (GULO GULO) IN SCANDINAVIA , 2006 .

[20]  J. Krebs,et al.  SYNTHESIS OF SURVIVAL RATES AND CAUSES OF MORTALITY IN NORTH AMERICAN WOLVERINES , 2004 .

[21]  H. Ellegren,et al.  DNA-Based Individual and Sex Identification from Wolverine (Gulo Gulo) Faeces and Urine , 2004, Conservation Genetics.

[22]  C. Krebs,et al.  Monitoring coyote population dynamics by genotyping faeces , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[23]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .

[24]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores , 2010 .

[25]  Craig R. Miller,et al.  A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark–recapture data , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[26]  Peter Segerström,et al.  Human caused mortality in the endangered Scandinavian wolverine population , 2009 .

[27]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Estimating Sustainable Harvest in Wolverine Populations Using Logistic Regression , 2008 .

[28]  L. Waits,et al.  Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  R. May,et al.  Habitat differentiation within the large-carnivore community of Norway's multiple-use landscapes , 2008, The Journal of applied ecology.

[30]  H. Ellegren,et al.  Genetic variation and population structure in Scandinavian wolverine (Gulo gulo) populations , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[31]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  Demographic Characteristics and Population Dynamical Patterns of Solitary Birds , 2002, Science.

[32]  J. Swenson,et al.  Predators and people: conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable , 2001 .

[33]  K Shea,et al.  Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  Michael K. Schwartz,et al.  ESTIMATING ANIMAL ABUNDANCE USING NONINVASIVE DNA SAMPLING: PROMISE AND PITFALLS , 2000 .

[35]  H. Andrén,et al.  People and Wildlife: A tale of two countries: large carnivore depredation and compensation schemes in Sweden and Norway , 2005 .

[36]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[37]  Gary C. White,et al.  Monitoring Vertebrate Populations , 1998 .

[38]  J. Swenson,et al.  Factors associated with wolverine Gulo gulo predation on domestic sheep , 1999 .

[39]  Gary C. White,et al.  Seasonal Compensation of Predation and Harvesting , 1999 .

[40]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Variable age structure and apparent density dependence in survival of adult ungulates. , 2003, The Journal of animal ecology.

[41]  E. Ostrander,et al.  Microsatellite markers for American mink (Mustela vison) and ermine (Mustela erminea) , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[42]  Peter Segerström,et al.  The role of intraspecific predation in the survival of juvenile wolverines Gulo gulo , 2003, Wildlife Biology.

[43]  J. DeWoody,et al.  Using naturally shed feathers for individual identification, genetic parentage analyses, and population monitoring in an endangered Eastern imperial eagle (Aquila heliaca) population from Kazakhstan , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[44]  A. Landa,et al.  Four polymorphic microsatellites in wolverine, Gulo gulo. , 1998, Animal genetics.

[45]  A. Landa,et al.  Action Plan for the conservation of Wolverines gulo) in Europe , 2000 .

[46]  P Taberlet,et al.  Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[48]  B. Sandercock.  Estimation of Demographic Parameters from Live-Encounter Data: a Summary Review , 2006 .

[49]  D. Gavier-Widén,et al.  DISEASES AND MORTALITY IN FREE-RANGING BROWN BEAR (URSUS ARCTOS), GRAY WOLF (CANIS LUPUS), AND WOLVERINE (GULO GULO) IN SWEDEN , 2005, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[50]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Diet shift of a facultative scavenger, the wolverine, following recolonization of wolves. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[51]  J. Linnell,et al.  Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment , 1998 .

[52]  K. Skogen,et al.  Adapting Adaptive Management to a Cultural Understanding of Land Use Conflicts , 2003 .

[53]  L. Waits,et al.  NONINVASIVE GENETIC SAMPLING TOOLS FOR WILDLIFE BIOLOGISTS: A REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACCURATE DATA COLLECTION , 2005 .

[54]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[55]  Anne Chao,et al.  Estimating Animal Abundance with Capture Frequency Data , 1988 .

[56]  FRED S. GUTHERY,et al.  INVITED PAPER: INFORMATION THEORY IN WILDLIFE SCIENCE: CRITIQUE AND VIEWPOINT , 2005 .

[57]  Rosie Woodroffe,et al.  People and Wildlife, Conflict or Co-existence? , 2005 .

[58]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Quality indexes to assess the reliability of genotypes in studies using noninvasive sampling and multiple‐tube approach , 2006 .

[59]  Erlend B. Nilsen,et al.  Demographic Side Effects of Selective Hunting in Ungulates and Carnivores , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[60]  J. Swenson,et al.  WOLVERINES AND THEIR PREY IN SOUTHERN NORWAY , 1997 .

[61]  H. Ellegren,et al.  Microsatellite genotyping of DNA isolated from claws left on tanned carnivore hides , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[62]  R. May.  Spatial Ecology of Wolverines in Scandinavia , 2007 .

[63]  S. Engen,et al.  MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE WOLVERINE IN SCANDINAVIA , 2005 .