Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity--ecosystem-function relationships.

How closely does variability in ecologically important traits reflect evolutionary divergence? The use of phylogenetic diversity (PD) to predict biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning, and more generally the use of phylogenetic information in community ecology, depends in part on the answer to this question. However, comparisons of the predictive power of phylogenetic diversity and functional diversity (FD) have not been conducted across a range of experiments. To address how phylogenetic diversity and functional trait variation control biodiversity effects on biomass production, we summarized the results of 29 grassland plant experiments where both the phylogeny of plant species used in the experiments is well described and where extensive trait data are available. Functional trait variation was only partially related to phylogenetic distances between species, and the resulting FD values therefore correlate only partially with PD. Despite these differences, FD and PD predicted biodiversity effects across all experiments with similar strength, including in subsets that excluded plots with legumes and that focused on fertilization experiments. Two- and three-trait combinations of the five traits used here (leaf nitrogen percentage, height, specific root length, leaf mass per unit area, and nitrogen fixation) resulted in the FD values with the greatest predictive power. Both PD and FD can be valuable predictors of the effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning, which suggests that a focus on both community trait diversity and evolutionary history can improve understanding of the consequences of biodiversity loss.

[1]  J. Klironomos,et al.  Influence of Phylogeny on Fungal Community Assembly and Ecosystem Functioning , 2007, Science.

[2]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 Neotropical tree species. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Comparative Plant Ecology , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[4]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[5]  H. A. Gleason,et al.  Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. , 1963 .

[6]  S. Naeem,et al.  Plant neighborhood diversity and production , 1999 .

[7]  Bernhard Schmid,et al.  Janzen-Connell effects are widespread and strong enough to maintain diversity in grasslands. , 2008, Ecology.

[8]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  HOW DO DIFFERENT MEASURES OF FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY PERFORM , 2004 .

[9]  John N. Griffin,et al.  Functional diversity predicts overyielding effect of species combination on primary productivity , 2009 .

[10]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Biodiversity and plant productivity in a model assemblage of plant species , 1996 .

[11]  J. Dukes Productivity and complementarity in grassland microcosms of varying diversity , 2001 .

[12]  J. Emmett Duffy Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real‐world ecosystems , 2009 .

[13]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology , 2010, Bioinform..

[14]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[15]  Bradley J. Cardinale,et al.  Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems , 2006, Nature.

[16]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Matthew R. Helmus,et al.  Phylogenetic Measures of Biodiversity , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[18]  P. Keddy,et al.  Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants , 2008 .

[19]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  On dendrogram-based measures of functional diversity , 2006 .

[20]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition , 2002 .

[21]  Eric Garnier,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION , 2004 .

[22]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics , 2005 .

[23]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  John Fox,et al.  TEACHER'S CORNER: Structural Equation Modeling With the sem Package in R , 2006 .

[25]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Phylocom: Software for the Analysis of Phylogenetic Community Structure and Trait Evolution , 2022 .

[26]  D. Tilman,et al.  Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems , 1996, Nature.

[27]  K. McConway,et al.  Absence of phylogenetic signal in the niche structure of meadow plant communities , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  D. Faith Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[29]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity does not capture body size variation at risk in the world's mammals , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Eoin J. O’Gorman,et al.  A functional guide to functional diversity measures , 2009 .

[31]  P. Reich,et al.  Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[32]  Nina Buchmann,et al.  Plant species richness and functional composition drive overyielding in a six-year grassland experiment. , 2009, Ecology.

[33]  J. Lepš,et al.  Effect of functional group richness and species richness in manipulated productivity–diversity studies: a glasshouse pot experiment , 2006 .

[34]  J. Sprent,et al.  Occurrence of nodulation in the Leguminosae. , 1989, The New phytologist.

[35]  J. Fridley Diversity effects on production in different light and fertility environments: an experiment with communities of annual plants , 2003 .

[36]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[37]  P. Reich,et al.  Legume presence increases photosynthesis and N concentrations of co-occurring non-fixers but does not modulate their responsiveness to carbon dioxide enrichment , 2003, Oecologia.

[38]  J. Losos Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[39]  Arthur Cronquist,et al.  Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada , 2004 .

[40]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Using Phylogenetic, Functional and Trait Diversity to Understand Patterns of Plant Community Productivity , 2009, PloS one.

[42]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties , 2006 .

[43]  F. Woodward,et al.  ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY MANIPULATIONS IN EUROPEAN GRASSLANDS , 2005 .

[44]  J. Lepš,et al.  Effects of species and functional group richness on production in two fertility environments: an experiment with communities of perennial plants , 2007 .

[45]  P. Reich,et al.  Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species , 2002 .

[46]  Jason D. Fridley,et al.  Resource availability dominates and alters the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem productivity in experimental plant communities , 2002, Oecologia.

[47]  P. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Biodiversity effects increase linearly with biotope space , 2004 .

[48]  Nina Buchmann,et al.  Niche complementarity for nitrogen: an explanation for the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relationship? , 2006, Ecology.

[49]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  David Tilman,et al.  The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients , 2001 .

[51]  P. Reich,et al.  [Letters to nature] , 1975, Nature.

[52]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[53]  Martin Hermy,et al.  The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora , 2008 .

[54]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland , 2008 .