Characterization of Emissions from a Desktop 3D Printer

Summary 3D printers are currently widely available and very popular among the general public. However, the use of these devices may pose health risks to users, attributable to air-quality issues arising from gaseous and particulate emissions in particular. We characterized emissions from a low-end 3D printer based on material extrusion, using the most common polymers: acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) and polylactic acid (PLA). Measurements were carried out in an emission chamber and a conventional room. Particle emission rates were obtained by direct measurement and modeling, whereas the influence of extrusion temperature was also evaluated. ABS was the material with the highest aerosol emission rate. The nanoparticle emission ranged from 3.7·108 to 1.4·109 particles per second (# s−1) in chamber measurements and from 2.0·109 to 4.0·109 # s−1in room measurements, when the recommended extruder temperature was used. Printing with PLA emitted nanoparticles at the rate of 1.0·107 # s−1 inside the chamber and negligible emissions in room experiments. Emission rates were observed to depend strongly on extruder temperature. The particles’ mean size ranged from 7.8 to 10.5 nanometers (nm). We also detected a significant emission rate of particles of 1 to 3 nm in size during all printing events. The amounts of volatile organic and other gaseous compounds were only traceable and are not expected to pose health risks. Our study suggests that measures preventing human exposure to high nanoparticle concentrations should be adopted when using low-end 3D printers.

[1]  P. Papazafiri,et al.  Computational modeling as part of alternative testing strategies in the respiratory and cardiovascular systems: Inhaled nanoparticle dose modeling based on representative aerosol measurements and corresponding toxicological analysis , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[2]  A. Nel,et al.  Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Characterization of Aerosol Surface Instruments in Transition Regime , 2005 .

[5]  Yong Huang,et al.  Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer , 2015 .

[6]  Who Regional Office for Europe,et al.  WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants , 2011 .

[7]  Chris Keen,et al.  Airborne emissions of carcinogens and respiratory sensitizers during thermal processing of plastics. , 2013, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  Olivier Ramalho,et al.  Size distribution and emission rate measurement of fine and ultrafine particle from indoor human activities , 2008 .

[9]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Indoor Aerosol Modeling: Basic Principles and Practical Applications , 2008 .

[10]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Design, Calibration, and Field Performance of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier , 2011 .

[11]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Aerosol Measurement by Induced Currents , 2014 .

[12]  Janina Maier,et al.  Aerosol Measurement Principles Techniques And Applications , 2016 .

[13]  D. Taylor,et al.  Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1996 .

[14]  Godwin A. Ayoko,et al.  Quantification of the relationship between fuser roller temperature and laser printer emissions , 2010 .

[15]  D. Dockery,et al.  Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[16]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Particle emission factors during cooking activities , 2009 .

[17]  Erik Nordin,et al.  Contribution of indoor-generated particles to residential exposure , 2015 .

[18]  Tim Caffrey,et al.  3D Printing Builds Up its Manufacturing Resume : The additive manufacturing revolution is in full stride, flying in aircraft and giving manufacturers a robust tool for design and production , 2014 .

[19]  G. Biskos,et al.  Performance comparison of two thermodenuders in Volatility Tandem DMA measurements , 2016 .

[20]  Chungsik Yoon,et al.  Emissions of Nanoparticles and Gaseous Material from 3D Printer Operation. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2001 .

[22]  P. Azimi,et al.  Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers , 2013 .

[23]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[24]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Particle Size Magnifier for Nano-CN Detection , 2011 .

[25]  C. rd,et al.  Epidemiology of fine particulate air pollution and human health: biologic mechanisms and who's at risk? , 2000 .

[26]  Martin Duckworth,et al.  Green jobs and occupational safety and health : Foresight on new and emerging risks associated with new technologies by 2020 Report , 2013 .