A Comparison of Tactile, Visual, and Auditory Warnings for Rear-End Collision Prevention in Simulated Driving

Objective: This study examined the effectiveness of rear-end collision warnings presented in different sensory modalities as a function of warning timing in a driving simulator. Background: The proliferation of in-vehicle information and entertainment systems threatens driver attention and may increase the risk of rear-end collisions. Collision warning systems have been shown to improve inattentive and/or distracted driver response time (RT) in rear-end collision situations. However, most previous rear-end collision warning research has not directly compared auditory, visual, and tactile warnings. Method: Sixteen participants in a fixed-base driving simulator experienced four warning conditions: no warning, visual, auditory, and tactile. The warnings activated when the time-to-collision (TTC) reached a critical threshold of 3.0 or 5.0 s. Driver RT was captured from a warning below critical threshold to brake initiation. Results: Drivers with a tactile warning had the shortest mean RT. Drivers with a tactile warning had significantly shorter RT than drivers without a warning and had a significant advantage over drivers with visual warnings. Conclusion: Tactile warnings show promise as effective rear-end collision warnings. Application: The results of this study can be applied to the future design and evaluation of automotive warnings designed to reduce rear-end collisions.

[1]  John Richardson,et al.  The influence of alarm timing on braking response and driver trust in low speed driving , 2005 .

[2]  D. E Haigney,et al.  Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes , 2000 .

[3]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  DRIVER DISTRACTION WITH WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[4]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes , 2005 .

[5]  Thomas K. Ferris,et al.  The Implications of Crossmodal Links in Attention for the Design of Multimodal Interfaces: A Driving Simulation Study , 2006 .

[6]  B L Cole,et al.  What attracts attention when driving? , 1986, Ergonomics.

[7]  Robert Graham,et al.  The Format and Presentation of Collision Warnings , 1997 .

[8]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Multisensory In-Car Warning Signals for Collision Avoidance , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[9]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[10]  J. V. Erp,et al.  Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system , 2004 .

[11]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[12]  John D. Lee.  A functional description of ATIS/CVO systems to accommodate driver needs and limits , 1997 .

[13]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Good Vibrations: Tactile Feedback in Support of Attention Allocation and Human-Automation Coordination in Event-Driven Domains , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Michael A. Shulman,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF FUNCTIONAL DEFINITIONS AND EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR COLLISION WARNING/AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[15]  A H Rupert.  An instrumentation solution for reducing spatial disorientation mishaps. , 2000, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[16]  Pratyush Bhatia.  Vehicle Technologies to Improve Performance and Safety , 2003 .

[17]  S.M. Harris,et al.  Information Processing , 1977, Nature.

[18]  Ronald R. Knipling,et al.  Assessment of IVHS countermeasures for collision avoidance : rear-end crashes , 1993 .

[19]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control and Alert Modality on Driver Performance , 2009 .

[21]  Jan E B Törnros,et al.  Mobile phone use-effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Human Performance Models and Rear-End Collision Avoidance Algorithms , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[23]  H. Bastian.  Sensation and Perception.—I , 1869, Nature.

[24]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Joshua D. Hoffman,et al.  Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction , 2004, CHI.

[26]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  H. Schiffman.  Sensation and Perception: An Integrated Approach , 1976 .

[28]  H. Schiffman.  Sensation and perception: An integrated approach, 3rd ed. , 1990 .

[29]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of an Automobile Moving-Map Navigational Display , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[30]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  MEASURING DRIVING PERFORMANCE BY CAR-FOLLOWING IN TRAFFIC , 1994 .

[31]  Ryan M. Traylor,et al.  A Haptic Back Display for Attentional and Directional Cueing , 2003 .

[32]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[33]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  John A. Michon,et al.  The perception of lead vehicle movement in darkness , 1976 .

[35]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[36]  John Richardson,et al.  The effect of alarm timing on driver behaviour: an investigation of differences in driver trust and response to alarms according to alarm timing , 2004 .

[37]  Marilyn Bohl,et al.  Information processing , 1971 .

[38]  J. V. Van Erp,et al.  Presenting directions with a vibrotactile torso display , 2005, Ergonomics.