Compressed Beamforming in Ultrasound Imaging

Emerging sonography techniques often require increasing the number of transducer elements involved in the imaging process. Consequently, larger amounts of data must be acquired and processed. The significant growth in the amounts of data affects both machinery size and power consumption. Within the classical sampling framework, state of the art systems reduce processing rates by exploiting the bandpass bandwidth of the detected signals. It has been recently shown, that a much more significant sample-rate reduction may be obtained, by treating ultrasound signals within the Finite Rate of Innovation framework. These ideas follow the spirit of Xampling, which combines classic methods from sampling theory with recent developments in Compressed Sensing. Applying such low-rate sampling schemes to individual transducer elements, which detect energy reflected from biological tissues, is limited by the noisy nature of the signals. This often results in erroneous parameter extraction, bringing forward the need to enhance the SNR of the low-rate samples. In our work, we achieve SNR enhancement, by beamforming the sub-Nyquist samples obtained from multiple elements. We refer to this process as “compressed beamforming”. Applying it to cardiac ultrasound data, we successfully image macroscopic perturbations, while achieving a nearly eightfold reduction in sample-rate, compared to standard techniques.

[1]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Xampling in ultrasound imaging , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sampling at the rate of innovation: theory and applications , 2012, Compressed Sensing.

[3]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Xampling: Compressed Sensing of Analog Signals , 2011, Compressed Sensing.

[4]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[6]  B. B. Bauer,et al.  Fundamentals of acoustics , 1963 .

[7]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging and Its Modeling , 2002 .

[8]  M. Vetterli,et al.  Sparse Sampling of Signal Innovations , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  G. Farhat,et al.  Diagnostic ultrasound Imaging : Inside out , 2004 .

[10]  Richard Shiavi,et al.  Introduction to Applied Statistical Signal Analysis: Guide to Biomedical and Electrical Engineering Applications , 2006 .

[11]  T. Sarkar,et al.  Using the matrix pencil method to estimate the parameters of a sum of complex exponentials , 1995 .

[12]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Innovation Rate Sampling of Pulse Streams With Application to Ultrasound Imaging , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Multichannel Sampling of Pulse Streams at the Rate of Innovation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Compressed beamforming with applications to ultrasound imaging , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[15]  M. Rudelson,et al.  On sparse reconstruction from Fourier and Gaussian measurements , 2008 .

[16]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Xampling at the Rate of Innovation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Xampling: Analog to digital at sub-Nyquist rates , 2009, IET Circuits Devices Syst..

[18]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[19]  B. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Introduction to spectral analysis , 1986 .

[20]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[21]  Thierry Blu,et al.  Sampling signals with finite rate of innovation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[22]  A. E. Brown Rationale and summary of methods for determining ultrasonic properties of materials at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory , 1995 .

[23]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[24]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Xampling: Signal Acquisition and Processing in Union of Subspaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[25]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Linear description of ultrasound imaging systems , 2001 .