Synthesis and Characterization of Types A and B Gelatin Methacryloyl for Bioink Applications

Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) has been increasingly considered as an important bioink material due to its tailorable mechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and ability to be photopolymerized in situ as well as printability. GelMA can be classified into two types: type A GelMA (a product from acid treatment) and type B GelMA (a product from alkali treatment). In current literature, there is little research on the comparison of type A GelMA and type B GelMA in terms of synthesis, rheological properties, and printability for bioink applications. Here, we report the synthesis, rheological properties, and printability of types A and B GelMA. Types A and B GelMA samples with different degrees of substitution (DS) were prepared in a controllable manner by a time-lapse loading method of methacrylic anhydride (MAA) and different feed ratios of MAA to gelatin. Type B GelMA tended to have a slightly higher DS compared to type A GelMA, especially in a lower feed ratio of MAA to gelatin. All the type A and type B GelMA solutions with different DS exhibited shear thinning behaviours at 37 °C. However, only GelMA with a high DS had an easy-to-extrude feature at room temperature. The cell-laden printed constructs of types A and B GelMA at 20% w/v showed around 75% cell viability.

[1]  M Cornelissen,et al.  Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. , 2000, Biomacromolecules.

[2]  Jos Malda,et al.  Gelatin-Methacryloyl Hydrogels: Towards Biofabrication-Based Tissue Repair. , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[3]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[4]  Deok‐Ho Kim,et al.  Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink , 2014, Nature Communications.

[5]  Johnson H. Y. Chung,et al.  Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells. , 2013, Biomaterials science.

[6]  Alexandra L. Rutz,et al.  A Multimaterial Bioink Method for 3D Printing Tunable, Cell‐Compatible Hydrogels , 2015, Advanced materials.

[7]  Jianchao Zhang,et al.  Overview of 3D printing technologies for reverse engineering product design , 2016, Automatic Control and Computer Sciences.

[8]  Edgar Yong Sheng Tan,et al.  A Mathematical Model on the Resolution of Extrusion Bioprinting for the Development of New Bioinks , 2016, Materials.

[9]  Lay Poh Tan,et al.  Current Status of Bioinks for Micro-Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting , 2016, Molecules.

[10]  May Win Naing,et al.  Polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogel optimized for 3D bioprinting in skin tissue engineering , 2016 .

[11]  R. P. Chhabra,et al.  Non-Newtonian Fluid Behaviour , 2008 .

[12]  Lay Poh Tan,et al.  Efficient and controllable synthesis of highly substituted gelatin methacrylamide for mechanically stiff hydrogels , 2015 .

[13]  Wen Liu,et al.  3D Printing Technology and its Applications , 2015 .

[14]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Functionalization, preparation and use of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl–based hydrogels as modular tissue culture platforms , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[15]  P. Dubruel,et al.  The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[16]  Hitomi Shirahama,et al.  Precise Tuning of Facile One-Pot Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Synthesis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Three-dimensional bioprinting using self-assembling scalable scaffold-free “tissue strands” as a new bioink , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  A novel 3D printing method for cell alignment and differentiation , 2015 .

[19]  Subbu Venkatraman,et al.  Printing cell-laden gelatin constructs by free-form fabrication and enzymatic protein crosslinking , 2015, Biomedical microdevices.

[20]  A. Gaharwar,et al.  Advanced Bioinks for 3D Printing: A Materials Science Perspective , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[22]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[23]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Microfluidic Bioprinting of Heterogeneous 3D Tissue Constructs Using Low‐Viscosity Bioink , 2016, Advanced materials.

[24]  Yong Liu,et al.  3D printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses in 4D printing , 2015 .

[25]  Wei Sun,et al.  The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology , 2015, Biofabrication.

[26]  Satyajit Patra,et al.  A Review of 3D Printing Techniques and the Future in Biofabrication of Bioprinted Tissue , 2016, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[27]  Wai Yee Yeong,et al.  A preliminary model of time-pressure dispensing system for bioprinting based on printing and material parameters , 2015 .

[28]  Bing Chen,et al.  3D bioprinting of BMSC-laden methacrylamide gelatin scaffolds with CBD-BMP2-collagen microfibers , 2015, Biofabrication.

[29]  P. Gatenholm,et al.  3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. , 2015, Biomacromolecules.